Virus Skeptics Vs Believers Showdown: Settling The Debate With Blind Experiments
Dr. Tim Cowan, who has been practicing medicine for 37 years, suggests that having a political or scientific debate regarding the existence of disease-causing viruses would be a waste of time. He suggests doing different kinds of experiments to show that virus particles don’t cause disease.
He also says the virologists won’t even debate or ‘waste their time’ debating what they consider settled science (you’ve heard that before).
Dr. Cowan says that to prove the viral particle exists, you first need to find the particle in the tissues or fluids in a sick person or animal, purify it, characterize the proteins, characterize the genetic material, prove that all the proteins are coded for and by the genetic material, and show pictures of this isolated, purified particle.
Once that’s done, you then show this ‘isolated, purified particle causes the same illness or similar illness in a laboratory animal.’
But virologists insist you can’t find this particle in any fluid or sick person as it’s not part of the virology repertoire; therefore, they won’t do the experiment.
This has created a stalemate between those who believe in disease-causing particles (viruses) and those who don’t. Dr. Cowan suggests doing a different, novel experiment that both sides of the argument can agree on. Watch:
h/t Joe O.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
I’ve been reading the views of Jon Rappoport about this and I am increasing coming round to accepting what he says. It is difficult to accept that vaccinations I have been given over the years are effectively useless. I did not have the covid “vaccination” because I didn’t accept the mRNA technology had been proven and I did not accept the trial data showed any benefit. I have had the flu vaccination for years but I cannot find any evidence to show that it is effective. The question I’m now asking is if no virus has been isolated, what is in the vaccines?
We should all be concerned about this and I wish Dr Cowan good luck with this proposal.
Reply
Zoe Phin
| #
“what is in the vaccines?”
The “Virus”
Reply
Geraint Hughes
| #
Good plan. Lets do it.
Reply
Photios
| #
Not ‘Tim’. Not ‘Tam’
‘Tom’.
Reply
Whokoo
| #
TimTam’s are a biscuit. Has Dr. tom Cowan a soft center?
Reply
Tom
| #
Tim Tam and the Turn-Ons was a rock group from the Detroit Mi area in the mid 1960’s. “Wait A Minute” was their biggest hit.
Reply
bmatkin
| #
If not virus that causes disease, what causes flu, cold etc???
Reply
Whokoo
| #
During times past such as the 1600’s some believed that contagion infecting a relatively isolated community was caused by the vapours rising from the swamps.
I do not accept that venereal diseases are caused by methane being emitted from swamps.
Reply
Tom
| #
A cold or a flu is the result of your body trying to expel accumulated toxins, which are everywhere. Your body gets rid of these toxins in various ways and you get “sick” with various symptoms which is nothing more than your body trying to get rid of the junk it doesn’t want.
Reply
Darryl Lawton
| #
Look up Germ Theory v Terrain Theory.
Reply
John
| #
I’m very open minded and have looked at Cowan’s hypothesis. It’s full of holes. He is essentially saying, if you can’t measure it, it doesn’t exist. Yet something does make people sick and is contagious. Except for people with perfect health that have never been sick, this should be obvious.
Reply
TheQuieterOne
| #
He doesn’t have a hypothesis, he points out that there are gaping logical flaws in the virus hypothesis. Contagion is an unproven assumption that fails under testing. In any case, the tests he proposed should put it to bed. The virologists will whine, evade and distort because they know. It’s written all over their papers.
Reply
John
| #
His hypothesis is that what’s called infectious disease is actually caused by a nutritional deficiency, toxin, or injury. He believes there is nothing contagious, and virus and bacteria don’t cause illness. He makes very good points that viruses have not been properly isolated, and there a big problems with the whole virus understanding.
However, something is contagious and is spread from person to person and causes disease. There is a mystery here, but saying something doesn’t exist just because you can’t measure it is ridiculous, and counters observed reality.
Reply
Tom
| #
Using your context, a person could invent anything and claim it exists. You say that there need be no proof of existence so in that context I am saying that unicorns exist but I can’t measure them but I know they exist.
Reply
Darryl Lawton
| #
It’s called cell poisoning. It comes from the toxins that you accumulate daily. The body creates a virus to expel the toxins. It’s called Terrain Theory, just as Pasteur’s work is called Germ Theory.
Some very powerful and wealthy people and drug corporations support Germ Theory because it nets them trillions of dollars in profits.
Reply
VOWG
| #
Finding what that something is should be of importance, not blind acceptance. Look at what blind acceptance of the not-vaccines has caused. Tens of thousands of deaths and millions of injuries yet governments are still pushing the poison into people, it is disgraceful.
Reply
Tom
| #
All we want is the truth. The medical community claims that viruses exist and that they can be transmitted from person to person, yet they have failed miserably to show how this is done. If they want me to believe them, then they must show me reasons to accept their theories. Not just turn away and tell me to believe or else or that they, being the supreme medical experts they want us to believe they are, are all knowing and are never to be questioned. That is indoctrination and slavery.
Reply