Vaccine ‘dramatically’ increases heart risk, says new study
EUROPE and much of the Western world is in upheaval as people take to the streets over Covid. Mainstream media reports depict these protests as a response to vaccine mandates and other losses of freedom. That is far from the whole story, however.
They are also driven by a profound loss of confidence in the quality of the science behind the vaccination drive. Numerous warnings on the dangers of the jabs (see for example here, here, here, here, here and here) and of deaths and injuries associated with it, have gone unexamined and unreported.
The latest red alert on the dangers comes from Dr Steven Gundry, a renowned American cardiac surgeon, now medical director of the International Heart and Lung Institute at Palm Springs, California.
For the past eight years, his group has monitored the heart health of patients using a clinically validated test that predicts their risk of suffering an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), such as heart attack or angina, within the following five years.
ACS is defined as a range of conditions associated with sudden loss of blood flow to the heart, often caused by a piece of plaque breaking away from a blood vessel wall, or formation of a blood clot in the heart’s arteries.
The test, called PULS (Protein Unstable Lesion Signature), gives a score based on changes from the norm of nine protein biomarkers, all linked to what is going on in heart tissue and blood vessel walls (epithelium).
When the score goes up, it is a signal to the doctors and patients of a need to take remedial steps. When it goes below the norm, it means the five-year risk is low.
In an abstract presented to a meeting of the American Heart Association, published this month in the association’s journal Circulation, Gundry reports that ‘dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients’ after the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid shots.
The test was conducted in 566 patients, aged 28 to 97, between two and ten weeks following their second jab. The result was compared to their previous PULS score, drawn three to five months pre-shot.
Markers for inflammation, cell death, and T-cell movement (indicating an immune response to coronary artery injury) all increased, resulting in the overall PULS score rising from an 11 per cent five-year ACS risk in these patients, to a 25 per cent risk.
The report notes that the changes were seen in most vaccinated patients. It adds:
‘These changes persist for at least two and a half months post second dose of vaccine. We conclude that the mRNA vaccines dramatically increase inflammation of the endothelium and T-cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.’
Regulatory agencies in the US and UK have (belatedly) acknowledged that inflammation of the heart muscle and heart lining can occur after Covid vaccination, but say these adverse reactions are rare, and far outweighed by the known risks of Covid itself.
As of mid-November, however, 9,332 heart attacks had been reported in the wake of a Covid shot under America’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) – and according to a 2010 report, that might be one hundredth of the actual total because of medical reluctance to acknowledge vaccine harm.
Dr Gundry’s report, labelled formally as a warning to his American Heart Association colleagues, provides further evidence of a mechanism that may be putting millions at risk.
Commenting on the findings, medical blogger Dr Jesse Santiano points out that rupture of unstable coronary plaques, leading to a heart attack, is the most likely reason vaccinated athletes drop dead in the middle of a game.
He expresses the concern that the PULS cardiac score will get higher with booster shots, and will also risk long-term damage to the hearts of children and teenagers given the mRNA vaccines, even though their risk of death from Covid itself is minuscule.
He also points to a recent study covering all 16 states in Germany which found that the higher the vaccination rate in 2021, the higher the excess mortality compared to the previous five-year average.
Meanwhile, much of Africa has so far avoided large swathes of Covid deaths, despite fewer than six per cent of people being vaccinated. ‘Africa doesn’t have the vaccines and the resources to fight Covid-19 that they have in Europe and the US, but somehow they seem to be doing better,’ says Wafaa El-Sadr, chair of global health at Columbia University.
With governments around the world having been persuaded by Big Pharma, and lavishly-funded researchers, to go down the mass vaccination route as their primary response to the arrival of the genetically engineered SARS-COV-2, it will be hard to change course. But change they must – or the disaster we are already seeing promises to become a catastrophe.
See more here: conservativewoman.co.uk
Header image: Cardiac Metabolic Institute
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Bevan
| #
” much of Africa has so far avoided large swathes of Covid deaths, despite fewer than six per cent of people being vaccinated”
No mystery there, as a guard against malaria, hydroxychloroquinine, HCQ, is freely available over the counter. However in their wisdom the medical profession/governments have banned its sale in the first-world nations, now rapidly decaying towards third world conditions. After all, they would not want to hinder the pharmaceutical industry from making massive profits from the experimental messenger RNA gene therapy would they ?
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Bevan.
Hydroxychloroquine is an ionophore ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionophore ) and may have some positive influence in Covid mitigation in Africa but Ivermectin is administered widely in Africa annually for parasite treatment which is shown to inhibit catching the disease. Prophylaxis.
Curiously the Wiki link used to refer to hydroxychloroquine which has since been deleted but it does now mention chloroquine and it’s ability to carry zinc ions into the cell.
The below reference is a 4 minute video suggesting other researchers have reached similar conclusions to Dr Gundry’s abstract but have not published in fear of loosing funding.
Reply
Josh
| #
Yeah, that, and average age of subsaharan Africans is lower than anywhere else in the world. Not many 84 year olds in nursing homes there.
Reply
Mervyn
| #
Why have these regulatory bodies abandoned their role as regulators? You’d think they are the PR department of Big Pharma.
Fancy them acknowledging that inflammation of the heart muscle and heart lining can occur after Covid vaccination, but saying these adverse reactions are rare, and far outweighed by the known risks of Covid itself. Incredible!!!
They are supposed to ensure the jabs are safe for everyone. They are there to ensure nobody deserves to die from an experimental drug, and nobody deserves to get injured. And if they do, the role of regulators is to cease the jabs until more testing has been completed.
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
I disagree with the above article, because it does not necessarily agree with the facts as I see them – I really think it has to do with the batch numbers, what the outcomes will be – for example, this last week alone: JABBED BEEN NANOCHIPPED? – NEW EVIDENCE!
When we first discovered the easily replicable vaccine-induced-magnetism, we quickly laughed off the idea that the magnetism was caused by chips planted under the skin.
The chips we thought of, were grain-sized, nonmetallic and simply too bulky to be used nefariously in such a mass vaccination programme.
Chips could not be floating around each vial, undetected by innocent nurses.
However, since those initial days last Spring, the evidence for ‘chips’ has been mounting.
Except, not large bulky chips.
This is 2021.
We are in the era of nanotechnology.
Tighten your seat belts for this one…
This is research again originating from the Spanish teams under Dr Campra of Almeria University.
SOURCE IN SPANISH: https://corona2inspect.blogspot.com/
NotTheBeeb
AND
Bleed to death on the inside from graphene hydroxide in vaxx trial roulette
by Editor, cairnsnews
It’s not just about mRNA. And the Australian Government wants to give this deadly concoction to kids?
Dr. Andreas Noack did a heartfelt video call out (Austria) in regards to the graphene allegedly discovered in the Pfizer shots.
He was assaulted shortly afterwards and the latest alleged report by his partner is that he is now dead.
https://tokentube.net/v/3033406015/Has-DR–ANDREAS-NOACK-been-killed-after-publishing-his-findings-about-the-vaccines-
This was his educated explanation as transcribed:
“There is a Professor in the University of Almeira, Professor Dr. Pablo Campra.
He studied the vaccines for the presence of graphene oxide using Micro-Raman Spectroscopy.
It is the study of frequencies.
There are frequency bands. Two of those bands are important.
They show that it is not graphene oxide but rather graphene hydroxide.
I would like to explain what graphene hydroxide is.
Dr Andreas Noack investigated nanoscale tiny razor blades injected into body and victim bleeds to death on the inside, He recently died under mysterious circumstances
It is a mono-layer activated carbon.
There are C6 rings. He found it in all samples. Every corner is a carbon atom.
This is on a nanoscale. If it is 5 nm long, there are 500 rings in a row. These are hydroxy groups (OH). In graphene oxide you have double bonded oxygen, but in graphene hydroxide you have an OH group. The electrons are delocalised (fully mobile).
The piece is 50nm (nanometre) long but only 0.1nm thick.
These C6 structures are extremely stable. You can make braking pads out of this.
It is not biologically decomposable.
These nanoscale structures can best be described as razor blades.
These razorblades are injected into the body.
Nano-scale tiny razor blades. Only one atom thick layer.
The OH hydroxy groups can split off a proton. When the proton is split off, they gain a negative charge spread out over the whole system.
It is basically an acid.
It suspends well in water because of the negative charge.
So these are razor blades spread homogeneously in the liquid.
This is basically Russian roulette.
It cuts the blood vessels.
The blood vessels have epithelial cells as their inner lining. It is extremely smooth, like a mirror and it is cut up by these razor blades. That is what’s so dangerous.
If you inject the vaccine into a vein, the razors will circulate in the blood and cut up the epithelium.
The thing is, toxicological tests are done in a petri dish so you will not find anything.
These are the sharpest imaginable structures because they are only one atom layer thick.
I am a Specialist in Activated Carbon. In my Doctoral thesis I have converted graphene oxide to graphene hydroxide. I joined the world leading activated carbon Manufacturer. I was in charge of new carbon activated products…
If you perform an autopsy on the victims you will not find anything.
Toxicologists do their tests in petri dishes.
They can’t imagine that there are structures that can cut up blood vessels.
People bleed to death on the inside.
The top athletes who are dropping dead have fast flowing blood.
The faster the blood, the more damage the razors will do.
As a chemist, if you inject this into the blood, you know you are a murderer.
It is a new material, toxicologists are not aware of it yet.
You see people collapse immediately after a vaccination and have a seizure.
These people have bad luck in this Russian roulette.
Very likely a vein was hit by the syringe.
Do you think a Pediatrician understands what graphene oxide is?
An important concept in Science is disputation.
A Scientific debate.
The basis of medicine or pharmaceuticals is chemistry.
Completely new substances, unknown to nature are brought in with the vaccines.
Everyone is talking about mRNA which is complex.
But every chemist understands what graphene hydroxide does.
The mRNA story is possibly a diversion.
I cannot imagine that anyone will be able to give me, as a Carbon specialist, a proper explanation as to why these carbon razor blades are in the vaccine.
This is war.
Even if the people don’t drop dead immediately, it cuts up the blood vessels little by little. It destroys the heart. All the heart attacks. All the strokes. The brain is cut up. Blood vessels are cut up.
These graphene structures are so stable, they are not degradable. Every chemist knows this.
The epithelial cells become rough when cut up like this, and things stick to it.
This material is declared an experimental vaccine for a reason.
In Germany or Austria there is nobody with my expertise. The leading German carbon Specialist Dr. Harmut von Kienle was my mentor for one year. I wrote my thesis in this field…”
So user beware. You don’t know what batch you are getting. It’s a Clinical trial after all.
CairnsNews
I did a Google search of this bloke’s name and it came back positive – the above blurb is real
AND
Vaccine Induced Cellular Ageing
November 28, 2021 By NEWS WIRE
Dr Mike Williams
21st Century Wire
In prior articles we discussed the increased risk of Sars Cov2 infection after Covid vaccination and introduced concepts of immune tolerance and immune training. In this article I want to introduce the topic of cellular senescence, specifically as it relates to Covid vaccination.
From Cellular Senescence: What, Why, and How we learn:
Cellular senescence is a process that results from a variety of stresses and leads to a state of irreversible growth arrest. Senescent cells accumulate during aging and have been implicated in promoting a variety of age-related diseases.
Cellular senescence may play an important role in tumor suppression, wound healing, and protection against tissue fibrosis; however, accumulating evidence that senescent cells may have harmful effects in vivo and may contribute to tissue remodeling, organismal aging, and many age-related diseases also exists
Effectively, the process of senescence is synonymous with cell ageing, and for simplicity we can assume that inducing cellular senescence will promote accelerated ageing. With caveats, there appears to be a plus side to that, potential tumour suppression. Indeed, pharmaceutical research, is interested in that. But nothing is ever that simple, and as Gonzalez-Meljem et al. point out in Paracrine roles of cellular senescence in promoting tumourigenesis, it’s a double-edged sword:
Although senescence has historically been considered a protective mechanism against tumourigenesis, the activities of senescent cells are increasingly being associated with age-related diseases, including cancer. An important feature of senescent cells is the secretion of a vast array of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors collectively known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Recent research has shown that SASP paracrine signalling can mediate several pro-tumourigenic effects, such as enhancing malignant phenotypes and promoting tumour initiation.
What of the mechanisms and why are they important for us to Know? In Management of multicellular senescence and oxidative stress Haines & colleagues explain:
The first stage of cellular senescence is damage-induced cell cycle arrest, also called replicative senescence (RS). Typically, this growth arrest is triggered by stress-induced DNA damage responses (DDR), and also may be induced as a result of effects of telomere erosion – a phenomenon that produces stress-related metabolites 27.
From the above we clearly see that certain stressors can cause damage to DNA that induce responses in the cell that can lead to the cell cycle arrest. Because DNA damage can lead to cancer, attempting to ‘switch it off’ (cycle arrest) may be a good idea. Of course, when cellular senescence happens on a larger scale, as stressors accrue over time, it is recognised as ageing.
But what of vaccination? In SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Paracrine Senescence and Leukocyte Adhesion in Endothelial Cells Meyer & colleagues explore a relationship of cellular senescence and virus Sars Cov2 infected cells. Their findings are concerning.
Virus-infected or spike-transfected human epithelial cells exhibited an increase in senescence, with a release of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)-related inflammatory molecules.
Source: SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Paracrine Senescence and Leukocyte Adhesion in Endothelial Cells
The key point is both Sars Cov2 virus infected cells and spike protein transfected cells induce cellular senescence.
AND
Then we have ALL of the other side effects from vaccines as reported on VAERS, Euro?. THE UK Yellow Card Scheme, each one of those vaccine illnesses probably specific to the batch numbers it was delivered from.
Thus, a multitude of deadly side effects from the vaccines is part and parcel in the way of keeping the public on the hop, never knowing which outcome, decided by someone else, is going to cause their probable termination and it should be really interesting when the satellites in space switch on with 5G and the neural network and probably mind control from somewhere else for many – the new Zombie thingy – what interests me is that when a person dies and is buried – even though the body is dead, will the dead arise from the ground and “work” because of the neural network – after all, presumably, it does not matter if the body is alive or dead, for that to happen?
Reply
Richard Noakes
| #
Re the above post – this is (just) the Eurdraviligance one: The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, and they are now reporting 31,014 fatalities, and 2,890,600 injuries, following COVID-19 injections.
This database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries. The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.)
So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured following COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.
The EudraVigilance database reports that through November 20, 2021 there are 31,014 deaths and 2,890,600 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
· COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
· COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
· COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
· COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)
From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (1,355,192) are serious injuries.
“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. It is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*
Here is the summary data through November 20, 2021.
Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2, Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 14,526 deaths and 1,323,370 injuries to 20/11/2021
· 35,826 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 207 deaths
· 40,230 Cardiac disorders incl. 2,128 deaths
· 376 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 33 deaths
· 17,995 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 10 deaths
· 1,217 Endocrine disorders incl. 5 deaths
· 20,443 Eye disorders incl. 32 deaths
· 110,658 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 585 deaths
· 337,450 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 4,118 deaths
· 1,502 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 75 deaths
· 14,528 Immune system disorders incl. 76 deaths
· 53,108 Infections and infestations incl. 1561 deaths
· 20,222 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 240 deaths
· 33,067 Investigations incl. 451 deaths
· 9,103 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 249 deaths
· 164,885 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 179 deaths
· 1,163 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 114 deaths
· 225,032 Nervous system disorders incl. 1,556 deaths
· 1,851 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 55 deaths
· 206 Product issues incl. 2 deaths
· 24,225 Psychiatric disorders incl. 174 deaths
· 4,667 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 224 deaths
· 43,949 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 5 deaths
· 57,013 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 1,617 deaths
· 62,414 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 125 deaths
· 2,765 Social circumstances incl. 19 deaths
· 4,797 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 60 deaths
· 34,678 Vascular disorders incl. 626 deaths
Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273 (CX-024414) from Moderna: 8,518 deaths and 390,163 injuries to 20/11/2021
· 8,227 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 94 deaths
· 12,657 Cardiac disorders incl. 915 deaths
· 156 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 6 deaths
· 4,698 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 2 deaths
· 348 Endocrine disorders incl. 3 deaths
· 5,731 Eye disorders incl. 29 deaths
· 32,091 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 326 deaths
· 104,720 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,986 deaths
· 644 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 40 deaths
· 3,820 Immune system disorders incl. 16 deaths
· 14,668 Infections and infestations incl. 782 deaths
· 8,158 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 162 deaths
· 7,117 Investigations incl. 143 deaths
· 3,703 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 206 deaths
· 47,355 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 174 deaths
· 531 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 67 deaths
· 66,320 Nervous system disorders incl. 823 deaths
· 722 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 6 deaths
· 78 Product issues incl. 2 deaths
· 7,100 Psychiatric disorders incl. 142 deaths
· 2,277 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 164 deaths
· 8,061 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 7 deaths
· 17,235 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 914 deaths
· 20,963 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 76 deaths
· 1,769 Social circumstances incl. 36 deaths
· 1,374 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 78 deaths
· 9,640 Vascular disorders incl. 319 deaths
Total reactions for the vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/AstraZeneca: 6,145 deaths and 1,075,335 injuries to 20/11/2021
· 13,124 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 248 deaths
· 19,128 Cardiac disorders incl. 696 deaths
· 195 Congenital familial and genetic disorders incl. 8 deaths
· 12,669 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths
· 597 Endocrine disorders incl. 4 deaths
· 18,919 Eye disorders incl. 29 deaths
· 102,402 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 312 deaths
· 283,288 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,469 deaths
· 950 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 60 deaths
· 4,834 Immune system disorders incl. 29 deaths
· 32,441 Infections and infestations incl. 413 deaths
· 12,358 Injury poisoning and procedural complications incl. 177 deaths
· 23,611 Investigations incl. 150 deaths
· 12,369 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 91 deaths
· 159,668 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 94 deaths
· 624 Neoplasms benign malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 22 deaths
· 221,536 Nervous system disorders incl. 958 deaths
· 521 Pregnancy puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 12 deaths
· 188 Product issues incl. 1 death
· 19,933 Psychiatric disorders incl. 58 deaths
· 4,031 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 58 deaths
· 15,124 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 deaths
· 37,980 Respiratory thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 735 deaths
· 49,247 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 48 deaths
· 1,498 Social circumstances incl. 6 deaths
· 1,404 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 25 deaths
· 26,696 Vascular disorders incl. 437 deaths
Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 1,825 deaths and 101,732 injuries to 20/11/2021
· 986 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 40 deaths
· 1,837 Cardiac disorders incl. 155 deaths
· 35 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
· 1,033 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 2 deaths
· 69 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
· 1,351 Eye disorders incl. 7 deaths
· 8,500 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 75 deaths
· 26,871 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 488 deaths
· 121 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 11 deaths
· 445 Immune system disorders incl. 9 deaths
· 4,315 Infections and infestations incl. 143 deaths
· 920 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 18 deaths
· 4,766 Investigations incl. 103 deaths
· 625 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 45 deaths
· 14,897 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 43 deaths
· 54 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 3 deaths
· 20,097 Nervous system disorders incl. 197 deaths
· 41 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
· 26 Product issues
· 1,407 Psychiatric disorders incl. 16 deaths
· 417 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 22 deaths
· 2,059 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 6 deaths
· 3,617 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 234 deaths
· 3,094 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 8 deaths
· 319 Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
· 690 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 54 deaths
· 3,140 Vascular disorders incl. 140 deaths
*These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.
HumansAreFree
Well, that’s OK then
Reply
My Homepage
| #
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here: principia-scientific.com/vaccine-dramatically-increases-heart-risk-says-new-study/ […]
Reply