Vaccine Culture Runs Rampant With The RSV jab
Guest post by Daniel Horrowitz.
More than 150 women and babies have received the wrong shot — and those are just the ones we know about.
The pharmaceutical industry for 60 years failed to produce a safe RSV vaccine, following a botched attempt in the 1960s.
We’ve all lived with this virus, and most babies afflicted with it are treated easily with a nebulizer.
Yet suddenly, the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control have approved three different vaccines — all for different demographics — at warp speed (ahem), despite serious safety concerns.
Now, pharmacies are carelessly mixing up each type of vaccine and even giving children the adult version because, when it comes to vaccines, “it’s all good.”
When it comes to vaccination, we are being sold a bill of goods that it’s all or nothing — but if you know what’s good for you, it better be all.
The FDA last year approved RSV shots for three different groups: GSK’s Arexvy and Pfizer’s Abrysvo for seniors over 60; Pfizer’s Abrysvo variant for pregnant women; and AstraZeneca’s Nirsevimab, a monoclonal antibody, for newborn babies.
They all have serious problems.
Last week, the CDC issued an alert warning that more than 150 women and babies have been administered the wrong shot — and those are just the ones we know about.
According to a report from the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, 25 babies were given Pfizer’s RSV shot for pregnant women or GSK’s shot for seniors, while at least 128 pregnant women were given the senior shot!
The tragic irony is that members of the CDC’s own Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices raised questions about the fact that this shot “can overstimulate the immune system, which is why it is only used for the elderly or immunocompromised.”
Set aside the fact that any drug that “overstimulates” the immune system probably should never be approved for anyone after all we’ve seen with COVID and all the associated problems with neuropathies and autoimmune disorders stemming from such overstimulation.
But now we know that this shot was given to pregnant women. Can you imagine the long-term effects of overstimulation in an unborn baby?
According to FDA briefing documents, two people in the Pfizer RSV trial for people over 60 experienced a dangerous form of neuropathy known as Guillain-Barré syndrome. The rate was 1 in 9,000, which is bad enough.
But we’ve seen from COVID that GBS is a known reaction to the jab, and Bell’s palsy, a similar form of neuropathy, has racked up 16,755 entries in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
Of course, we know that the shot for pregnant women is just as problematic as the one for seniors, so maybe it doesn’t make a difference which potion they received. GSK was forced to abort its version due to preterm and neonatal deaths during clinical trials.
Pfizer’s shot, which was approved last summer, has the same safety signals. No matter. We’re off to the races jabbing as many pregnant women as can be guilted into it.
Red-state health departments have an obligation to begin auditing the CDC vaccine schedule — beginning with this wretched RSV vaccine.
The CDC recently reported that 13.1% of pregnant women had received the Abrysvo vaccine since the product went to market in the fall, while nearly 21 percent of mothers of eligible infants (8 months and older) reported they accepted the experimental shot for their babies.
Another 27 percent reported that they “definitely plan” to vaccinate their children.
That means half the babies in the country are on their way to getting this shot, as if we’ve learned nothing from the past few years.
The disgusting carelessness of the industry in giving people the wrong shots is emblematic of a culture that treats vaccination as more of a religious ritual than a medical procedure.
When it comes to medical procedures, we don’t categorically offer them to every living human as if “it’s all good.” We don’t give everyone pre-emptive drugs, surgeries, or chemotherapy. Asking someone if he’s pro- or antivaccine is like asking whether he’s pro- or anti-surgery.
There is a time and a place even for proven interventions. They must be precise and tailor-made to individuals.
Vaccination is no different. Yet we are being sold a bill of goods that it is all or nothing — but if you know what’s good for you, it better be all. Just get the ever-increasing litany of jabs, and if they happen to throw in a few extra doses of the wrong potion, no biggie.
This is why every time someone wants a tetanus shot, they add the quite unnecessary diphtheria vaccine, because … well, why not? It’s all good!
In 1983, the CDC’s vaccine schedule included just three routine vaccines: diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis; measles, mumps, and rubella; and the oral polio vaccine. Not surprisingly, once the industry was indemnified from liability under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the number of vaccinations steadily grew.
Now, the CDC has 17 routine vaccines of 90 doses for children.
Congress extended the liability shield for childhood vaccines to pregnant patients under the 21st Century Cures Act, with the proviso that the CDC recommends it. Including the new RSV shot, pregnant women are now under pressure to get five different shots.
We’re still assessing the damage from the COVID shots. We may not know for decades how many people died needlessly. We will feel the effects of countless miscarriages, stillbirths, fertility problems, and birth defects for generations.
We already have 3,000 reports of injuries from the RSV shots reported to VAERS, according to data Dr. Jessica Rose sent me.
How can we continue to trust the CDC when we absolutely know it is harming us? It’s really just a question of which of the vaccines are bad.
The CDC is using “One Health,” a World Health Organization concept that would impose a centrally controlled system of enforcement, surveillance, and incentives on every human being.
The goal is to replicate and expand the COVID regime to impose mass vaccination and a host of economic and social objectives in the name of public health.
If you thought the last “emergency” was bad, just you wait. It is simply indefensible for red-state health departments to adopt One Health.
They have an obligation to begin auditing the CDC vaccine schedule — beginning with this wretched RSV vaccine.
See more here substack.com
Header image: University of Oxford
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
…”It’s really just a question of which of the vaccines are bad.”…Really? Seriously? Assume they are all bad and save your life or add more years to it.
Reply