US Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna May OWN You If You Get Jab
Image: Ruby Wallau
This article is prefaced with a shout-out to the good Dr. Carrie Madej (maa-DAY). She is one of thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide suddenly labeled “conspiracy theorists” and “disinformation” by mainstream and social media. They tell peer-reviewed truth about COVID-19 and experimental shots. Dr. Madej is still on Twitter and Facebook for now. She is also featured in a viral video warning people about experiment mRNA and viral vector shots.
Dr. Madej said in a recent interview with The New American:
“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates et al., The Department of Defense, et al. can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”
All legitimate doctors and scientists welcome fact-checking and peer-review. Turns out Dr. Madej is onto something, and further affirms every reason not to volunteer for these experimental injections.
Man-made bacteria and genetically-modified mice are patentable
The case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980) is the first time the U.S. Supreme Court heard a patent case involving naturally-occurring processes and/or organisms. Dr. Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty invented a species of oil-eating bacteria while working at General Electric in 1971. His invention streamlined the process of cleaning up oil spills.
He filed a first-of-its-kind patent for the new genetically-modified bacteria species. The United Kingdom granted the patent already. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the patent because it determined the invention was a living organism. The U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (now the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) reversed the decision. It ruled that just because micro-organism are alive doesn’t mean they cannot be patented.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in 5-4 decision, affirmed. It ruled, in part:
Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a “manufacture” or “composition of matter” within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability.
The case paved the way for biotechnology companies and universities. The OncoMouse, patented by Harvard in 1988, was the first mammal ever patented. Harvard scientists genetically-modified mice to be predisposed to cancer (thus the “onco” prefix) so other scientists could study the disease.
Scientists have since created an entire discipline on “transgenic non-human mammals.” Of course there are serious ethical concerns. But the practice continue.
Patentability of human genes (mRNA and DNA)
The case that provides the blueprint for pharmaceutical companies claiming ownership of your genes is Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013). This case originated from a Utah-based company called Myriad Genetics.
The company isolated the location and sequence of naturally-occurring genes called BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mutations in these genes positively correlate with predispositions to breast and ovarian cancers. Myriad filed patents on these genes in 1994 and 1995, respectively. The patents gave Myriad exclusive rights to cancer genetic testing that isolated natural DNA strands and created synthetic complementary DNA (cDNA) that resembled the original isolated strands.
The USPTO granted both patents in 1998. At least 2,000 other human genes had been patented through 2010, according to the New York State Bar. But the Myriad patents hindered other scientists from doing research on naturally-occurring BRCA1 and BRCA2, and thus hindered breast and ovarian cancer testing by other companies.
Supreme Court permits patentable cDNA
Several Plaintiffs, including Yale, Columbia, individual patients, and patient advocacy groups filed a lawsuit against Myriad and the University of Utah in May of 2009. The Plaintiffs argued that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they are naturally-occurring. Myriad argued that it isolated the sequences of the DNA and that the Patent Office had issued patents for other companies doing the same thing.
A long legal battle ensued that included two writs of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Federal Circuit twice affirmed that both isolated DNA and cDNA are patentable. Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled that only cDNA (synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable. Breast and ovarian cancer screening got much cheaper after the ruling since Myriad no longer owned patents on naturally-occurring genes and thus the testing.
When it was all said and done, the Supreme Court invalidated five of Myriad’s 520 patent claims. Myriad sued competitors for marketing ovarian and breast cancers tests based on the two natural genes after the Supreme Court decision. Ambry Genetics won a case against Myriad in 2014. The company said via press release:
Myriad did not create or alter any of the genetic information encoded in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The location and order of the nucleotides existed in nature before Myriad found them. As the Supreme Court made clear, neither naturally occurring compositions of matter, nor synthetically created compositions that are structurally identical to the naturally occurring compositions, are patent eligible.
Pfizer, Moderna, et al. and your genes
Yes, this article contains a lot of scientific and legal mumbo-jumbo. But in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally-occurring. No mouse is born in nature like the OncoMouse. It is thus patentable. Oil-eating bacteria come from genetic manipulation, thus patentable.
Notice how all these so-called doctors and scientists avoid pointing fingers at Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson et al. when someone dies within hours, days or weeks of receiving their shots. It’s almost as if they are carefully navigating the trademark and patent landscape. Moderna owns several mRNA patents. But doctors and hospitals wanting a piece of the mRNA pie cannot bite the hand that feeds them.
The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your genetic code, making you “genetically-modified.” Granted mainstream media say the foregoing is “conspiracy theory.” But Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that the shots change your genetic code. He calls the Moderna shot “hacking the software of life.” Viral vectors do the same thing.
So do these companies “own you” once you get the shots? Well, they own mice and bacteria created with their inventions. Once you get these shots, you are no longer a “naturally-occurring” human being. Prosthetic limbs, breast implants, etc. are not “natural” per se. But they are removable and not part of what fundamentally makes you human. Gene therapy is irreversible. Do the math yourself.
Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.
See more here: eutimes.net
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
I brought this up in discussion threads last year. I couldn’t get a response. No one cared. It was like people didn’t believe it was possible, and therefore I was some kind of whack job. Its the same thing if I talk about their symbols.
I thought it was nuts that GMO corn was such a big deal in the public eye, but modified people? It does go further though. The definition of life has a sense for: an organismic state characterized by capacity for metabolism, growth, reaction to stimuli, and reproduction.
Its definitions like this that nag at me. If people are genetically modified to be sterile, what does it really mean?
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Greetings Wisenox:
In think that most of this speculation is just to distract the publics attention away from the basic issue that this entire medical scam is a fear based control mechanism by the Zionists to gain more control as they convince the goyim to relinquish their most valuable asset, their natural rights before a transparently asinine hoax.
Viruses have not even been proven to exist but as leading micro biologist Stephan Lanka has shown are merely cellular debris. Notice that none of the spike protein experts have collected the reward for virus identification yet or even have a real sample of covid 19. But they :”know” the whole mechanism of these spike proteins All of the MSM, CDC, WHO big Pharma subterfuge serves to cover up the fact that the invisible. imaginary, make believe pathogen has never been purified, isolated nor identified. That means their spike protein is almost certainly fake also. The more the elite and their operatives like Klaus Schwab and eugenicist Gates can detour the livestock on wild goose hunting the more they can prepare their Agenda 2030-21 hunger games technocratic society for everyone not in the Davos clique.
We do know for sure is that the fake virus, fake test and blood toxin injection have been planned for a long time as reporter Harry Vox exposed in 2014 from the Rockefeller foundation papers of 2010. The current medical scam is really the culmination of the over one hundred years of vaccination. lies and deception. And we know one more thing. The Davos crowd plan on culling the herd way down for better livestock management.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/K7V0i0bbk5DR/
Reply
Photios
| #
Chattel Slavery is re-legalised by ‘vaccination’…
Benjamin Franklin: “Those who would give up essential Liberty,
to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”;
and, most assuredly, they will soon have neither.
Reply
robob
| #
“new uncharted groundbreaking technology”
an empty excuse for large corps and politically connected to grab more power and money
if a mechanic replaces a part on your car, even if he custom fabricates its, he does not get an ownership interest in it
if a contractor builds a custom addition on your house, their name does not get added to your deed
vaxers deliver a product to a customer, and thats it.
a post-jab attempt to claim ownership is a violation of contract law,
not to mention human rights
Reply
JohnnyX
| #
Here’s a nightmare scenario:
Assuming the genes owned by Big Pharma are passed on to any children you may have, (Are they?) you could be forced to pay a royalty for your kid. One way to lower the world’s population would be to make it so that only the very wealthy can afford them, but of course the Georgia Guidestones are a crazy conspiracy theory. Right? I mean sure, it’s only done for the food we eat, but “They” would never even think of doing such a thing to us. Right?
Reply
Philip Horner
| #
The mRNA vaccines do not change your DNA.
THIS STORY IS BRAVO SIERRA.
Reply
Photios
| #
Tal Zaks says otherwise. See: https://stateofthenation.co/?p=56522
Reply
Mark Richardson
| #
Does that mean they would be held harmless for damages?
Reply
Joao Alvarez
| #
I was thinking about transgenic intellectual property law months ago. If they wanted to legally bring back slavery in a technocratic Neo Feudal totalitarian system this is how it could be done. Everything Hitler did was “legal”.
Reply
Sattva
| #
Bad interpretation. 1) No evidence that said “vaccines” can do anything but make a toxic protein. NO EVIDENCE OF DNA editing at all. If that were the case, still you would be a naturally occurring person. You would NOT cease to be a naturally occurring person. try to have some reason and some decent critical analysis. They cannot own you. DNA changes all the time, naturally. This is so f*cking stupid, really.
Reply