Urgent review required into MHRA’s approval of Covid vaccines
The MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority), which is responsible for the safety and efficacy of medicines used in the UK, announced that it has morphed “from Watchdog to Enabler.”
Would anyone be concerned if the Office for Nuclear Regulation, the Civil Aviation Authority or the Defence Safety Regulator made the same statement?
It has become clear during the Covid-19 pandemic that the MHRA has failed to meet its responsibilities in multiple ways, despite prior warnings of inadequate regulation published in Government reports.
This has resulted in harm to individuals, who are currently struggling to get recognition, treatment and compensation.
Everyone is invited to co-sign the Open Letter to Health Secretary Steve Barclay below. We will be delivering a hard copy in April.
Open Letter to:
Steve Barclay, Secretary of State for Health & Social Care
cc Rishi Sunak, UK Prime Minister
We, the undersigned, have had increasing concerns over the poor record of the Covid-19 vaccines for both safety and efficacy.
Many of us have signed letters to the MHRA questioning various aspects, particularly regarding the use of these products in healthy children and have received no proper replies.
The official response points to the ‘world class MHRA’, who can be trusted to have fully assessed that these vaccines are ‘Safe & Effective’ before providing any authorisation.
It has therefore been a revelation to read this detailed report of the inner workings of the UK’s regulatory authority.
The shortcomings outlined in the report, following on from the recent Cumberlege Report and coupled with the close relationship between the MHRA and the pharmaceutical industry, point to the need for an urgent reappraisal of the whole system of drug regulation.
The level of adverse events from the current vaccines, also requires urgent scrutiny.
We have no confidence in the process for ensuring ongoing safety of the Covid-19 vaccines and call for an immediate pause whilst an independent safety review is undertaken.
See more here substack.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Unfortunately, despite the claims, science has not been followed:
For example, see here.
The FDA Committee’s Review of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: Unscientific, False and Deceitful (https://bioanalyticx.com/the-fda-committees-review-of-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-unscientific-false-and-deceitful/)
And also, see here
“On the other hand, it is impossible to develop a proper vaccine because, as noted, one cannot monitor the virus or disease and then how the vaccine’s effectiveness will be established. It cannot be! Therefore, a fake vaccine will most likely be developed to satisfy the regulatory wish and calm down the created public hysteria and fear. Unfortunately, such vaccines, if developed and administered, will undoubtedly create potentially dangerous side effects, without any presumed benefits, by interfering with the body’s immune system and other related physiological processes.”
https://bioanalyticx.com/science-for-the-pandemic-at-the-authorities-false-in-fact-fraudulent-requires-urgent-action/
Unfortunately, medical/pharmaceutical professionals are realizing the error now, when actual science described/predicted this outcome at the beginning of the pandemic.
Perhaps, more importantly, the issue is not directly related to medical or pharmaceuticals (vaccines) but to testing. Therefore, the testing issue must first be resolved, which medical and pharmaceutical experts cannot address. Consider approaching testing experts.
Reply