UN’s Annual Budget to Support Global Migration

The mission creep of the United Nations has gotten way out of control. As just one of many examples, the UN mission to unilaterally encourage global migration has resulted in multiple avoidable political crises.

It is past time to de-fund and re-organize the United Nations.

In the case of the US Congress under the current executive, in the immediate future this can be accomplished through use of specific restrictions on how appropriations can be used, much as is commonly done with internal budgeting.

Looking forward to a new executive administration, this should be coupled with diplomatic efforts to build an international coalition of nations which will support a major defunding and restructuring effort.

The current UN structure and charter has outlived its usefulness, and has been coopted to advance globalist, utilitarian, socialist and malthusian political objectives.

This is not what the UN was created for, and efforts to create a globalist, one-world government structure by cooptation of the United Nations to serve this agenda can only be stopped by systemically reorganizing and downsizing the organization.

As just one of many examples of UN mission creep, the United Nations, through its International Organization for Migration (IOM), has launched its Global Annual Appeal for 2024.

The UN wants USD 7.9 billion to “support its operations and help create a system that realizes migration’s promise as a force for good throughout the world.

Another case of a carefully crafted mission statement which obfuscates the actual intent and purpose of an initiative by using misleading feel-good wording.

The UN says it will use the money for three purposes:

1) “saving lives and protecting people on the move”,

2) “finding solutions to displacement, including reducing the risks and impacts of climate change” and

3) “facilitating regular pathways for migration.” The UN (IOM) writes that their goals include “proactive work to unlock the huge potential of migration for economic growth and human development.”

“The evidence is overwhelming that migration, when well-managed, is a major contributor to global prosperity and progress. We are at a critical moment in time, and we have designed this Appeal to help deliver on that promise. We can and must do better.”  – IOM Director General Amy Pope

Who is Amy Pope, Director General of the UN’s IOM?

In October, 2023, Amy Pope was elected as Director General of the UN’s International Organization for Migration. The IOM reports that her previous job in the US government was:

“Senior Advisor on Migration to US President Biden and served as the Deputy Homeland Security Advisor to President Obama.

While working at the White House, DG Pope developed and implemented comprehensive strategies to address migration, in areas such as countering trafficking in persons, resettling refugees and vulnerable people, and preparing communities to respond and adapt to climate-related crises.” 

So, basically Amy Pope is the person who is directly responsible for the open border resettlement policies under President Biden.

She failed to protect our towns, cities and states from receiving massive incursions of illegal aliens in our border states. She is one the people responsible for six million refuges crossing our border into the USA since Biden took office.

Now she is zealously working for the UN to continue her commitment to massive migration programs through out the world. Under Amy Pope’s initiative, the UN plans to use that $8 billion annually to further increase the massive numbers of illegal migrants through-out the industrialized world.

But don’t worry sugar, these migration programs will be “well-managed” – after all, just look how Director General Amy Pope as Senior Advisor on Migration for the Biden White House “resettled” refugees in the USA.

In fact, Texans are particularly proud and enthusiastic about her work <insert sarcasm>.

See more here substack.com

Header image: PR Newswire

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    Robert Beatty

    |

    Wow. That explains a lot. The sooner we return to MAGA concepts around the western world, the better.
    There is a basic problem where accountability is replaced by political spin. This has happened through a flaw in our systems of democracy.
    A system of Citizens Initiated Referendum, coupled with compulsory voting, gets over the accountability problem, and keeps “the people” in charge of government. CIR has worked in Switzerland since 1291. It is called “direct democracy”, and has to be written into a countries’ constitution.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi Robert,

      “coupled with compulsory voting” What’s the penalty for not voting?

      Have a good day

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Robert Beatty

        |

        In Australia, the penalty for not voting is $20. However, the real effect is to avoid non people from being on the registration role. Keeping a clean role is a major challenge for all forms of democracy. Having compulsory voting ties up a big loose end.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Jerry Krause

          |

          Hi Robert,

          Interesting concept. But how can one have a election
          without any loser?

          Have a good day

          Reply

        • Avatar

          aaron

          |

          ever wonder why voting is such an important issue with them?
          voting only legitimizes their supposed authority
          stop the silly useless act of voting, you can not vote your way out of tyranny. Your vote only gives them legitimacy

          Reply

  • Avatar

    Koen Vogel

    |

    You had me at “The current UN structure and charter has outlived its usefulness, and has been coopted to advance globalist, utilitarian, socialist and malthusian political objectives.” But I beg to differ strongly: they mainly act to enrich themselves. I lived for a while in Vienna, which has a big UN representation. You need to realize that New York and Vienna are very, very attractive locations for UN ambassadors. Which may not be a hell of an enticement for a US politician, but is really, really big for someone from a third world country. In Vienna I met: the owner of the largest string of brothels (in a not to be named country), numerous delegates related to a country’s ruling family, and an arms dealer. Their connection: they worked for the UN. I cannot imagine a more corrupt group of self-enriching people, acting without international supervision. So yeah, go for it Dr Robert.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Robert Beatty

      |

      Interesting comment Koen,
      That summarises what is wrong with the UN. Now it is up to individual nations to recognise this limitation and act accordingly. My view is that western nations need to unlock the combined intelligence of the whole population. See https://bosmin.com/HOME/Bottom-UpGovernment.pdf

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Wisenox

    |

    The UN’s goal is to “consume” the west. Even put the Sumerian ‘king of the dead’ (hades) outside as a statue (winged panther) as one of the 2 flesh eaters from revelation’s pale horse. The other is a swine, which is Eve/Gaia the UN new age religion. So, both flesh eaters are there.
    Their alliance is with the nobility and their WHO/WEF creations.
    “You’ll own nothing”… yes because the goal is to consume that which you have.
    Doing a good job of it too. The middle class in the west is pretty much finished, and they’re the target.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via