UK Petition to Government Against Use of False Covid-19 Test Data
For those readers who live in the UK and share our concerns over the diabolical misuse of the PCR COVID19 test please consider adding your name to this important new petition to Parliament.
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION HERE: petition.parliament.uk
Why we argue the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test – used by governments as the bellwether for coronavirus – is not fit for purpose:
Health experts now say that PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2, the virus associated with the illness COVID-19, is too sensitive and needs to be adjusted to rule out people who have insignificant amounts of the virus in their system.
“I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine,” warns Dr. David Rasnick, biochemist and protease developer.
As we reported last month:
“The PCR test is so well known for giving inaccurate results that the CDC warns not to give the test to asymptomatic persons “because of the increased likelihood of false-positive results.” In fact, there is a famous Chinese paper that stated if you’re testing asymptomatic people with PCR, up to 80% of positives could be false positives.
But the numbers aren’t just skewed by false positives, they are also skewed by how many people are offered the test and what condition they are in. For example, during the first few weeks of the ‘pandemic’ tests were scarce. As they became more widely available of course the number of infections accounted for increased as well, and false-positive results further increased those numbers.”
Widespread reliance on the PCR for COVID19 testing is beyond stupid. It is criminal because it is pushed as justification for maintaining ‘lockdown’ measures and compounding the fear and misery (including economic) much of the world is still suffering as a consequence of this gigantic science fraud.
Please donate below to support our ongoing work to expose the lies about COVID19
At Principia Scientific International we are working hard to lobby elected government officials, fellow scientists and medical practitioners and relevant public health bodies to end the insane lockdown measures and assist us in exposing the pandemic fraud.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Andy Rowlands
| #
Thanks for adding this John, I have just signed. In the acnowledgement email to confirm my signature, there was an option to also inform my local MP, who happens to be the foul-mouthed Labour MP Jess Phillips, an ardent climate alarmist, who is also so I’m told fully supportive of severe lockdown measures.
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
“foul-mouthed Labour MP Jess Phillips, an ardent climate alarmist”
Greater than 94% of the energy contained within nitrogen and oxygen are unaccounted for by the ‘climate change’ narrative, informing us of the massive scientific fraud taking place, the purpose of the fraud to further weaken the West’s economies.
[On March 16 when Trump directed the nation to stay home for 15 days(!), his Marxist economic sabotage directive still in play. Immediately following Trump’s directive, governors/mayors declared illegal Executive Orders to lockdown the nation, thereby proving Marxist coordination between Federal/State/Local governments.
No new investments will be taking place because investments require recouping the investments, and with the spectre of the fake COVID-19 returning, or equally fake new pandemics, future lockdowns are in the future, therefore no investments are on the horizon. In short, the United States has been turned into a Banana Republic overnight.]
Nitrogen and oxygen constitute, by volume, 99.03% of the atmosphere’s gasses, while the trace gases account for 0.97%, or just under 1% of the atmosphere’s gasses. If we include water vapor (H2O) in the atmosphere, which accounts for, on average, 2% of the atmosphere’s gases by volume, we therefore subtract this 2% from the atmosphere’s gasses, where nitrogen and oxygen will constitute 97.0494%, and the trace gasses will constitute 0.9506%.
Nitrogen and oxygen don’t absorb much infrared radiation (IR) emitted from the ground, and assuming they absorb 100% of thermal energy from the surface, constituting approximately 5% of Earth’s energy budget, we’re left with a massive energy deficit for nitrogen and oxygen, confirming that those two molecules derive their energy from thermal ground/ocean emissions instead, but since the ‘climate change’ narrative identifies such emissions as not thermal but IR, we have proof that the energy being emitted isn’t IR but thermal because nitrogen and oxygen absorb a miniscule amount of IR.
Nitrogen and oxygen obtain 5.1% of their heat energy from thermal energy emanating from the surface…
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/The-NASA-Earth%27s-Energy-Budget-Poster-Radiant-Energy-System-satellite-infrared-radiation-fluxes.jpg/1200px-The-NASA-Earth%27s-Energy-Budget-Poster-Radiant-Energy-System-satellite-infrared-radiation-fluxes.jpg
…and another .078% of their heat energy from outgoing infrared radiation, leaving an energy deficit of approximately 94.8%.
Since nitrogen and oxygen constitute by volume 97.0494% of the atmosphere’s gasses (when water vapor is included in the calculations making for a more precise calculation), they must therefore retain that volume amount of heat energy, but 18.4 Wm2 only constitutes 5.1% of the Earth’s energy budget of 358.2 Wm2. Nitrogen and oxygen’s absorption of infrared radiation only infinitesimally affects this missing heat energy.
The missing energy levels for nitrogen and oxygen direct our attention to another aspect of the scientific fraud taking place: Misidentified outgoing energy types. IR is assigned an energy magnitude of 358.2 Wm2, and thermals 18.4 Wm2. The opposite is closer to the truth, where IR is assigned 18.4 Wm2, and thermals 358.2 Wm2.
Hence why:
THERMODYNAMICS IS AWOL
Climate change mechanics conspires to do away with the physics of the atmosphere, where action and reaction is abandoned. When a new gas molecule is introduced into the dense troposphere, dislocation takes place, where if the new molecule is denser than the atmosphere (contains less heat energy), such as carbon dioxide, the gas molecule sinks displacing upwards the warmer nitrogen and oxygen molecules, thereby cooling the area of dislocation. Conversely, if the new gas molecule has more heat energy than the nitrogen-oxygen based atmosphere (such as methane), the new molecule rises, displacing relatively cooler nitrogen and oxygen molecules downwards, which displaces upwards relatively more heat retaining nitrogen and oxygen molecules, thereby cooling the area of dislocation. Thermodynamics in action in the atmosphere that keeps the Earth cool when increased radiation isn’t the new variable introduced.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
Forgive me Dean, but I’m struggling to understand your comment. You copied a line of mine then wrote a lengthy treatise that appears totally unconnected.
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Cheers, Andy. If we can all spread the word far and wide hopefully it can get the 100,000 signatures needed to trigger a Parliamentary debate on the matter.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
I would hope so, but I’d bet a way would be found to avoid having such a debate.
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
“Health experts now say that PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2, the virus associated with the illness COVID-19, is too sensitive and needs to be adjusted to rule out people who have insignificant amounts of the virus in their system.”
A test can’t be “too sensitive” enough. A test’s robustness is its degree of sensitivity. As usual, Marxists are misusing words for societal sabotage purposes.
No software based test can identify a sequence of DNA nucleotides as belonging to any particular pathogen, which is why the PCR non-test says it relies on SIMILARITIES for a Query Sequence. However, no software program (FASTA and BLAST being two such widely used software programs) can even discern similarities for a Query Sequence (1) because the software programs don’t identify nucleic acid molecules; therefore (2) can’t even determine if there’s similarities.[1]
What the PCR non-test is identifying are the numbers of nucleotide sequences amplified. When amplification is, let’s say, 20X the software gives a negative result because it can’t see the green-dyed nucleotide sequences. When amplification is increased to 35x the PCR non-test will give a positive result 5% of the time. At 50x amplification the PCR non-test will give an 80% positivity rate. When amplification is increased to 60x, the PCR non-test gives 100% positivity. What the PCR non-test is actually identifying is the green dye!
If the green dye is removed from the PCR non-test, the result of the non-test will be 0% positivity 100% of the time!
At my blog, read the articles…
‘House of Cards: The Collapse of the ‘Collapse’ of the USSR’
‘Playing Hide And Seek In Yugoslavia’
Then read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’
Solution
The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology/blackmail, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.
My blog…
https://djdnotice.blogspot.com/2018/09/d-notice-articles-article-55-7418.html
[1] Imagine criminal forensic science requiring only similarities for fingerprint identification! Yeah, just as with the false positive laden PCR test, 100% of the nation would be guilty of a crime every time a fingerprint check was run! Or how about forensic DNA matching requiring only similarities! Imagine running a forensic ballistic test and only looking for similarities in bullet striations! Now one can fully appreciate the fraud behind the PCR non-test.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
“A test can’t be “too sensitive” enough. A test’s robustness is its degree of sensitivity. As usual, Marxists are misusing words for societal sabotage purposes.”
No, as an infection is based on viral load, sensitivity is indeed critical as it changes the accuracy of the test application. A light sensor for detecting when the lights are on in a room is useless if it reacts to even a static spark or a lit match. Sensitivity Matters. That is the problem with the PCR test, as at 35 cycles and above, it starts making enough mistakes, as noise, to give a false positive result. And, also, the PCR test is simply not fit for purpose.
Reply
Dean Michael Jackson
| #
“A light sensor for detecting when the lights are on in a room is useless if it reacts to even a static spark or a lit match.”
I want to know about that static discharge that can be a sign of intrusion or faulty electrical wiring, and who lit that match when I wasn’t home? Matches don’t light themselves!
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Dean,
Because of the sensitivity of testing almost all circulating paper money will test positive for cocaine. Are you willing to accept an accusation of drug dealing because the money in your wallet tests positive for the drug?
Herb
Reply
Finn McCool
| #
Thanks, John.
No. 3,731
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Nice one, Finn. Thanks
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
““The PCR test is so well known for giving inaccurate results that the CDC warns not to give the test to asymptomatic persons “because of the increased likelihood of false-positive results.”
So, if you give the test to an ill person, it is suddenly a real positive? It is more likely that an ill person would test positive because the test is so prone to false positives anyhow.
In other words, the test is not fit for purpose.
Reply
tom0mason
| #
Also of note is the number of other microbes that are with us, on us, and in us. These microbes out-number the total amount of cells in each of our bodies (see The human microbiome: Everything you need to know about the 39 trillion microbes that call our bodies home at https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/human-microbiome/ ).
Have any of these other microbes been tested ton see if they can elicit a positive PCR test result?
How well can the action of testing a person be shielded from picking up these other microbes?
Reply