UK Lawyer Serves Criminal Liability Notice On UK Vaxxers
Anna de Buisseret is a senior UK lawyer and a retired Army Officer with nuclear, biological warfare training. “That’s why I’m standing up and speaking out. I’m upholding my Oath to We the People to ‘Protect and Serve’,” she says. She has previously also worked as a management consultant at Pfizer.
For the past year she’s been working with a team of lawyers, both in the UK and internationally, to drill down into the evidence and the legal analysis of the Covid-19 pandemic. They are also working with various campaign groups including: HART; Covid19Assembly; World Doctors Alliance; UK Freedom Alliance; and, Us for Them.
During an interview with Tony Gosling de Buisseret explained what led her to believe Covid-19 was biowarfare. Because of her previous nuclear, biological and chemical weapons training and knowing that bioweapons had been in the making for a long time, she was “on high alert for bioweapons being released”.
In March/April 2020 she contacted an ex-army friend in China to discuss “the evidence, what was going on and comparing notes about what he was being told over in Beijing compared to what we were being told over in the UK.” For example, pictures at the start of the ‘pandemic’ of people falling dead in the streets in China – her contacts in China said, “it’s all nonsense”. De Buisseret had also heard Francis Boyle speaking out very early on saying, “this is a bioweapon, this is biowarfare”.
“We took enough witness evidence and looked at enough of the evidence – and as you know, with lawyers it has to become beyond reasonable doubt if you’re going to allege criminal activity – and it got to a point where, unfortunately, we reached the conclusion that it was beyond reasonable doubt,” de Buisseret said. After reviewing the definitions of genocide, crimes against humanity and biowarfare compared with what was going on, it was irrefutable.
In April 2021 they made an urgent application to the International Criminal Court requesting an investigation of the UK government.
During the interview she was asked about her “encounter with the police” where, outside a vaccination centre, police officers prohibited her serving notices of liability to the those injecting the public, “the vaccinators”. “It’s not legal,” de Buisseret said, “because it’s not being authorised and regulated under the correct [legal] framework.” She goes on to explain, “This is not a human medicine.
These, specifically the mRNA injections, cannot be legally defined either as a vaccine or as a human medicine, which is how they’ve been regulated – under the human medicines regulations.” According to expert teams the mRNA synthetic genetic code, which is nanotechnology encased in a lipid particle casing, fits the definition of a medical device rather than a human medicine. As such, it should be regulated under the medical device regulations.
The question of legality of the mass vaccination programme goes across several areas of law. It’s not just whether it’s being regulated properly under that particular bit of legislation. “And they’ve only got an emergency temporary authorization on the basis that a) there’s an emergency well, there is no emergency because we’ve got alternative treatments and we know the figures have been manipulated etc.
And, as for the basis on which to justify it: it has to be on the basis that there are no alternative treatments, well there are. So, their whole legality comes massively into question which is why I was very firm saying it’s not legal,” de Buisseret said.
In terms of deciding whether something is criminal one needs to look at the definition of the crimes and the definition of criminal acts. Whether it’s criminal or not in terms of how a tribunal order judge or the public will determine this, only time will tell.
“With criminal law you have to commit the acts. The acts that led to the harm, suffering, loss or death. And you have to have committed the act with intent, to do harm. But the thing about intent is that you can infer the intent because it’s based on knowledge. So, if you know that the act you’ve committed is going to cause harm, loss, suffering, or death then that’s your intent to do it,” de Buisseret explained.
She continued, “it crosses many different areas of both statute law, civil law, criminal law, common law, God’s laws, international laws. So, frankly, the legal analysis is vast because there is so many different laws being broken. It’s absolutely horrendous. We lawyers are totally gobsmacked at just how all the laws seem to be being trashed and nobody seems to care to uphold them. And it’s a crisis.”
She points out that another of the reasons the UK was in such crisis is because the police – being our public servants are obliged to investigate if a member of the public comes with prima facie evidence but, – are just “not interested” and do not even “want to look at it”.
“In our local community [we established] that there was sufficient evidence to know that various clinics in the area would not obtaining informed consent from people. And that people were in fact dying and being seriously harmed by [the Covid injection],” de Buisseret said.
De Buisseret also discussed the Nuremberg Trials in the context of Covid-19. “A lot of people haven’t even heard of the Nuremberg Trials let alone bothered to read the judgments,” she said and explains that the judgements are incredibly important reading because everything that is happening now, is cited in the Nuremberg Trials – doctors and nurses saying, through the culture of blame and silence: “I had to keep my job”, “I had to keep quiet”, “I had a mortgage”, or, “I had relatives to look after” – all the same reasons that people are giving today.
“And yet, when you hear how those defences were put forward and then how the tribunal dealt with them, you will see very clearly that, there is first of all, ignorance of the law is no defence. So, the fact that people say ‘well, I didn’t know I was breaking the law’, is no defence,” said de Buisseret. And, turning a blind eye or just assuming any comparison to the Nuremberg Trials is “a crazy conspiracy theory”, is ignorance. Because, it is a legal process of bringing people to account.
De Buisseret gave some ideas how the public can get involved in their “Informed Consent Campaign” and if you want to find out more, they will be setting up a website “Consent Alliance” and a channel on Telegram.
See more here: namastepublishing.co.uk
Header image: LinkedIn
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
https://www.pasenategop.com/blog/ed-080621/
The PANIC PORN continues in the USA demo-ratic controlled Pennsylvania who is CDC propagandized and is the only voice being recognized by the Wolf Administration. They are now seeking to vaccinate children under 12 despite the deaths of teenagers listed VAERS.
I understand that the morons in the USA Senate has authorized the CDC to be the only source of Scamdemic authority under provisions of the $3 trillion plus “Infrastructure” legislation.
Reply
Alan
| #
I have difficulty viewing the coronavirus as a biological weapon because it hasn’t been very effective. However, I do believe it is man-made, probably at the University of North Carolina and finally released in China, accidentally or deliberately, I do not know.
I think the virus was created to develop new treatments for viruses that are more profitable, but I can see there is a thin dividing line between this and biological weapons.
We do need the truth and so this action is necessary. I doubt we will ever get the truth because clearly the USA and China are involved, and neither will say anything about the other because they will implicate themselves.
Reply
very old white guy
| #
Alan. I agree if it is supposed to be a biological weapon it is the least effective ever developed. The psychological manipulation of the potential harm caused all the insanity world wide and that wing nut Ferguson is complicit in what has happened.
Reply
Howdy
| #
What seems to me to be the case is that the alleged vaccine was a mess and was not meant to act so soon. I expect the payload was meant to take time to reach critical mass, thus not implicating the jab.
Reply
Tom
| #
“not effective as a bio weapon”? How so?? It has been VERY effective – dead people are easily treated, SICK people however are a huge drain on resources and so the economy is under atatck.
You could say this is bio fiscal terrorism, a biological weapon is being used to destroy the global economy!
It is more effective to wound soldiers on a battlefield as it takes others out of the fight – this is the same idea.
Reply
Barry
| #
Totally agree Tom, one injured soldier takes five off battlefield in the old days. So I would say hospitals full of sick and dying very effective.
Reply
very old white guy
| #
Tom, the flu has never been a serious weapon. As I said, the fear ginned up was the weapon. Insanity is a very powerful weapon. The virus is a nothing burger.
Reply
very old white guy
| #
Barry, I don’t know where you get the idea that the bug filled hospitals, as it has not and will not. You must have read more than one article at this site stating the excess lies and misinformation propagated around the world.
Reply
Barry
| #
Yes I agree our death rate in Canada in 2020 really didn’t change other than what was expected due aging population. Fear is what it is about and taking the uneeded vaccine. That said I don’t know if there is a real covid or not certainly not as dangerous as we were lead to believe
Tom
| #
It is a weapon, of greed, all manipulated.
Detailed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsDlHprql-g&list=PLDMgEpykzG8SwV4E48myjpla5xsB3x_Tl
Reply
NecktopPC
| #
“The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19.”
“The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.”
See pages 1 and 3. Revised: Aug/12/2021
https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download
“The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine.”
“Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.”
See pages 3 and 4. Revised: 12 August 2021
https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Reply
tom0mason
| #
Heartless bureaucrats both within and outside the NHS are directing medical staff (and they are just following orders) to endanger yet more of the UK’s population with these dangerous experimental injections.
The Nuremberg Code consists of 10 principles, the first of which being that the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential in any experiment treatment on humans. And so logically that consent must be gained by accurately informing the recipient of all experimental treatments and the experimental treatments known and probable side effects.
This is also covered (to various degrees) by Declaration of Helsinki (adopted in 1964, and updated), UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005) or the International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans (fourth version published 2016) . All of these been sign-up to and adopted by the UK governments over the years, of course all of these are immaterial to the current UK government.
Reply
coronistan.blogspot.com
| #
Strange kind to use the HTML a tag.
Reply
A Reasonable Man
| #
I think this article is a good example of why rhetoric and semantics are often very critically important. I think the term bio weapon is a poor choice if you want reach the uniformed masses (or some would say sheep) people will think your a crackpot conspiracy theorist. I think we are probably dealing with mass stupidity in government leaders as usual, a lot of CYA and politcal “social change” oportunitist activism. With a no small smattering of profiteering thrown in.
Reply
Karma Singh
| #
You are, I fear, Reasonable, missing some information:
The whole thing is instigated and controlled by the banking cartel. Those whom they have “appointed” to government office have to follow orders if they wish to keep their privileged positions.
Blessed be
Karma Singh
Reply
Karma Singh
| #
There has been a lot of scaremongering over the last few decades about germ warfare. The problem is that, although many countries have, in secret, used such “weapons”, they have proven to be ineffectual. There is a VERY good reason for this: The hypothesis of “infectious disease” is total nonsense! Even Pasteur himself admitted such in his memoirs which were finally released to the public in 1995.
The fact that Tony Fauci illegally diverted $415 Million of public funds to pay the lab in Wuhan to make a bio-weapon out of a ‘flu “virus” does NOT mean that they succeeded.
There is, in fact, no evidence that a disease called “Corona Virus Disease 2019” (short: Covid-19) even exists.
Blessed be
Karma Singh
Reply