U.S. Patent Office: Rothschilds Planned COVID19 in 2015
New twist in the claims and counter claims that the Rothschilds patented the COVID19 testing system as far back as 2015. Video purports to show that U.S. Patents Office had the full biometric testing device patented five years BEFORE the pandemic.
In October 2020 there was considerable consternation online among independent researchers over the claim, published by a Dutch website, about a Rothschild medical patent for a “System and Method for Testing for COVID-19″ (here). Reuters, at the the time, went all in to discredit the article.
Reuters (the global news agency owned by the Rothschilds) rebutted the claim on October 27, 2020 by stating:
“The article claims that the 2015 priority date is evidence that the coronavirus pandemic has been planned. But the author has conflated the terms “priority date” and “application date”.
The priority date can refer to the earliest filing date in a family of related patent applications, or to the earliest filing date of a particular feature of an invention (here). In this case, Oct. 13, 2015 is when Rothschild first made a provisional application within this family of patents.”
This riposte served Reuters and their Rothschild owners well until now. But the video below depicts a credible online search of U.S. government database evidence indicating that Reuters were peddling fake news.
video source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/FwmdcP7ghqGe/
If valid, this may be strong evidence that would hold up in court that no less an authority than the U.S. Patents Office already had the Rothschild’s full patent with the title “System and Method for Testing for COVID19” in 2015.
A screenshot of the PubMed documentation is below:
The document may be accessed at pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=covid-19&tab=patent
If this is true, then this is compelling evidence of the biggest international racketeering crime in history.
About John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Bevan
| #
Where is the FBI, where are the Federal and State Attorney’s General, what is the US parliament doing ?
Reply
DeadHeartDiary
| #
Uh, that’s some kind of rhetorical joke, right?
Reply
Greg Spinolae
| #
There is NO MENTION of “Covid 19” in ANY of the dependant patents before mid 2020.
The 2015 “priority date” is spuious as it refers only to the earliest patent application upon which the current application (mid 2020) depends.
Twisting data like this to SPIN a FALSE STORY is no better than the fake “fact checkers” who do the same. This story is either the work of a Technocracy GreatReset shill or the mumblings of a particularly inept “researcher”. Either way it serves only to DISCREDIT the very REAL work being done by so many to expose the Covid Criminals.
Reply
Kevin
| #
Correct. No patent could be applied for for Covid 19 in 2015 because the name wasn’t crested by the WHO until late 2019. The patent would be for analysis of SARS-CoV which broke out in 2002. Then MERS in 2011. The WHO renamed it Covid 19 to allay fears in the Chinese about the virus, according to the WHO.
Reply
Kevin
| #
Correct. The article on the patent application was only for checking pulse and O2 to a smartphone where it would be uploaded to the cloud to check for viruses. The original author added LIKE COVID 19 which didn’t exist until late 2019. Click the first “here” and it goes to the patent app. Copied by the author here and there. This kind of bad source stories is how misinformation gets spread.
Reply
Andor
| #
Wrong search paramater. Use “coronavirus” and those patents will emerge.
Reply
Colin Henderson
| #
How could they patent a test for something that did not exist in 2015?
Reply
DeadHeartDiary
| #
From what I can tell, the cover is essentially this…
“Oh, look we didn’t PLAN to use it in relation to covid19…but it’s just too conveniently appropriate to not use it in relation to covid19.”
Reply
DeadHeartDiary
| #
I mean it’s kinda telling that it’s specifically for covid19, you know. Considering other “viral” diseases and such, prior.
Reply
Kevin
| #
Correct. No patent could be applied for for Covid 19 in 2015 because the name wasn’t crested by the WHO until late 2019. The patent would be for analysis of SARS-CoV which broke out in 2002. Then MERS in 2011. The WHO renamed it Covid 19 to allay fears in the Chinese about the virus, according to the WHO.
Reply
Tom O
| #
I don’t understand the reactions to this. It is no different than the fact that they were shipping material under that name that year as well. Strange that someone would be running around breaking into official sites and changing some official document, don’t you think? Personally, I find the reaction to this more inline with trying to cast doubt on fact than anything else. And Kevin, what makes you think that WHO “invented” the name, and what they called it had anything to do with “allaying fears in the Chinese.” You part of the WHO? As for DeadHeadDiary – yeah, I know that isn’t what you call yourself, its just what you sound like.
Reply
DeadHeartDiary
| #
The irony, considering other people personally attacking, adding nothing meaningful, not actually addressing anything other than my “character” is quite appropriate for the lesser types.
Reply
Tom
| #
The CDC and fauci have been manufacturing patents on SARS covid since the early 2000’s. Most of their patents were denied, but they went ahead anyway breaking law after law. Mengele fauci has funneled nearly $200 billion into the creation of covid over the last 20 years. Dr. David Martin, a renown patent expert, presents several detailed videos of the crimes. You can find some on Odysee.com.
Reply
Dan Pride
| #
The pervert PTO director under Clinton who supervised the ruling to allow the patenting of genes wound up in a series of events surrounding the first scientific proof of Solomon and the Old Testament that are loaded with signs of the end times. Rather strange stuff but there seems to be a deep truth to it somehow. Check out the character of one of the folks at the start of all this from the perspective of a college rival https://kingsolomonsgate.com/QT.htm
Reply