This Time Paradox Is Terrifying Scientists! No Solution!
Just like a playground has rules, the universe follows the laws of physics.
Humans are innately curious, and we often get bored with the familiar games. But to be able to discover new horizons, we must understand the very fabric of existence — spacetime, and the laws that define how everything in this mysterious universe behaves.
We know objects can move through space, but as they do so, they also journey through the ever-present dimension of time. Everything works quite intuitively when things travel slowly. It’s only when an object approaches the speed of light that strange phenomena start to happen.
Would you be able to see your reflection in a mirror while traveling at the speed of light? How could the universe rewrite events if you were to go back in time and try changing them? And what’s the solution to the grandfather paradox?
Source: YouTube
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.Â
Trackback from your site.
Howdy
| #
“the universe follows the laws of physics.”
Says who? The whole universe cannot be defined by this speck of dust called Earth.
Instrument readings of far bodies are not true science. In any case, all the unknowns the universe has to offer are not known. To claim what is transmitted from a vessel or camera is the truth is faith at best, and faith is not science.
If I transmit data via a one metre optical cable, I still risk corruption of that data, even though it’s optical. What about the interfaces and processing? Now view that cable as a distance across space, with all it’s other anomalies and objects.
Don’t fall into the trap of thinking digital means uncorruptable. Far from It. I can manipulate sound in the ‘digital domain’ so that the resulting output is nothing like the input. Same with an image.
In order to understand the Universe, one needs to know the Universe, and that will need to make universal travel possible. Even then, how will one define the unseeable unknowns – by Earth based physics? That is like defining another country by ones own.
“Spacetime” as it is called, won’t be understood in any time soon. It requires a mind that is free, also innocent of corruption and self craving. One that is of true openness to all things. ie, not governed by a set of rules.
Reply
Howdy
| #
For I am the first and the last.
I am the honored one and the scorned one.
I am the whore and the holy one.
I am the wife and the virgin.
I am and the daughter.
I am the members of my mother.
I am the barren one
and many are her sons.
I am she whose wedding is great,
and I have not taken a husband.
Sofia – Wisdom
The whole list:
http://gnosis.org/naghamm/thunder.html
Reply
Howdy
| #
I am and the daughter. = I am the mother and the daughter.
The site cut the words because of the symbols.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
The speed of light is not constant or a particle. It is a wave traveling in energy (gravity/magnetic) and matter (electric) fields and its velocity changes depending on the strength of those fields (red shift – blue shift).
The thought experiment Einstein did with the cook tower illustrates the error in his assumption that the change that occurs in one object (clocks and watches) apply to everything. By moving away from the clock tower and seeing that the time on the clock tower was now earlier than the time on the watch, he claimed that time had changed but it was just his perspective of the tools. By returning to the clock his watch and the tower clock would be in agreement meaning it wasn’t his motion that caused the change, just his perspective.
Energy is motion (v^2) or change and everything changes according to its energy. There is no time dimension constant for all.
Reply
Tom
| #
Even the greatest scientific assumption that the universe was created by the big bang is being severely challenged. Humans, especially arrogant scientists, have no claim on being smarter than the average tick or flea. Actually, we don’t know shyt about the universe.
Reply
Joe
| #
Einstein was paid by the Khazarian Mafia to lead us away from the truth. Quantum Physics is complete BS.
Reply
Shawn Marshall
| #
Time does not exist. It is simply an abstraction we use to quantify physical sequence.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Shawn,
You are correct. It is just another common reference unit like a liter, gram, or meter but instead of units of matter it measures change or energy.
Herb
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Readers and Commenters,
Are you merely philosophers who sit on chair and question if you exist Don’t question if the chair exists. Don’t question who made the chair. Don’t question if your computer or cell phone exists or who made them.
There can be no question that humans had long observed sun time. moon time, seasonal time.and even life times. I believe a man existed about four centuries ago that saw we could learn a lot if we invented instruments to see (measure) better and the instrument, the pendulum, was better (more precise) to measure short time periods than his pulse. And this man composed a book which too few scientists have ever read.
Have a good day
Reply
Howdy
| #
Unlike Icke, and similar people, I do exist. I am not ‘consciousness’, being force fed this ‘reality’ as a slave. The whole ‘consciousness’ thing is so tiresome, as well as lacking in description. Consciousness is of the mind, the potential. It cannot create anything, and requires balancing creative energy to bring that potential into form.
It was the Holy Spirit that hovered over the blank template of Earth, not God. God is the ‘consciousness’. The Holy Spirit is not.
Error in distance instruments is not philosophy Jerry. You should be asking if the far objects these people see really are what they appear. Is it not possible data received has been injected, or tampered with? How does one verify that the objects, at the distances claimed are true, unless one goes the distance to measure it and see the real object itself? Isn’t that the true definition of observation?
How does one prove a transmitted image, which is subject to levels of translation, thus error, is true to the source? One cannot. Too many unknowns – therefore it is a matter of faith.
Reply