Third exoplanet found orbiting Proxima Centauri
A little over four light-years away is Alpha Centauri, the closest star system to the Sun. And in August 2016, researchers announced they’d found a long-searched-for planet around Proxima Centauri, the smallest — and closest — component of this three-star system.
Then, in January 2020, astronomers spotted a second world around Proxima Centauri. And now, the star’s family tree appears to be growing again: A third terrestrial planet has been found orbiting the nearest star to Earth.
A new addition
In a study published Feb. 10 in Astronomy & Astrophysics, astronomers announced the discovery of Proxima d.
This tiny planet, weighing in at just one-quarter the mass of Earth, orbits Proxima Centauri every five days at a distance of some 2.5 million miles (4 million kilometers), or less than one-tenth the distance of Mercury from our own Sun.
But because Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf with only about 12 percent the Sun’s mass and 14 percent its diameter, this puts Proxima d in the star’s habitable zone, where conditions are just right for liquid water to potentially exist on its surface.
Proxima d was discovered using the radial velocity method, during which astronomers carefully watch a star to look for subtle changes in position, which occur as the gravity of an orbiting planet tugs on its star. This is the same method used to detect Proxima Centauri’s other two planets; Proxima b and c.
But these planets are more massive — in fact, Proxima d is the lightest exoplanet to date ever discovered using this method.
Family tree
So, how does this new addition to the family stack up against its siblings?
Proxima b, the first planet discovered around this star, is roughly the same mass as Earth and orbits every 11.2 days at a distance of 4.3 million miles (7 million km), or about 5 percent the distance Earth orbits the Sun.
But again, because Proxima Centauri is much smaller than our star, Proxima b also orbits in its habitable zone.
Proxima c is different: It’s a super-Earth weighing in at about six times our planet’s mass, with an orbital period of 5.2 years. That puts its orbit, at about 130 million miles (224 million km), beyond the habitable zone.
New worlds
Researchers discovered Proxima d using a new instrument called the Echelle SPectrograph for Rocky Exoplanets and Stable Spectroscopic Observations, or ESPRESSO, on the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile.
Now that the instrument has shown its mettle, astronomers are hoping to use it to uncover many more terrestrial worlds perhaps much like our own, both close to and far from home.
See more here: astronomy.com
Header image: ESO/L. Calçada
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.Â
Trackback from your site.
Howdy
| #
“where conditions are just right for liquid water to potentially exist on its surface.”
Isn’t that something of a contradiction?
“Echelle SPectrograph for Rocky Exoplanets and Stable Spectroscopic Observations, or ESPRESSO”
Come on, seriously?
Reply
Andy
| #
That’s what they called it, is that a problem?
Reply
Howdy
| #
Why would it be a problem? Think I’m attacking the person who published it on PSI perchance? If so, don’t waste yourself Andy, I was poking fun at the use of the words to make expresso. Is that a problem?
Chill out man!
Reply
Howdy
| #
Sorry, rplace x with s from expresso
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Andy,
I have a question: How do articles like this, which have been published by a magazine, a for profit business venture I assume, end up on the pages of PSI. So you as an editor go searching for these articles; or does someone at Astronomy send you the article for you to post and to advertise Astronomy for free for Astronomy.
And Andy, I am curious why you, an editor, make comments similar to the one here about what we commenters submit? Your comment doesn’t seem to add anything the article you chose to post or to Howdy’s comment. About which he questions what Established Science is doing. Which I believe is the reason for the existence of PSI. To question what is being published where people like John O’Sullivan and the other founders of PSI could not get their ideas and comments before a public audience.
Have a good day, Jerry
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply