The Surprising Reality of Biden vs. Trump on Fossil Fuels
The mainstream media (MSM) and prominent climate scientists often paint a dire picture of what another Trump presidency would mean for the climate.
For instance, Patricia Espinosa, the outgoing U.N. climate chief, warned that a second Trump term would be a “killer blow” for efforts to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
She emphasized that Trump’s return to the White House would significantly hinder global climate action efforts, potentially leading to catastrophic environmental consequences.
Similarly, climate scientist Michael E. Mann described a potential second Trump term as “game over” for climate action, arguing that Trump would dismantle both domestic and global climate policies, making it nearly impossible to meet international climate goals.
However, a closer examination of President Biden’s tenure reveals some surprising trends that challenge the narrative of a uniquely disastrous impact from a Trump presidency.
Despite Biden’s strong climate rhetoric and initial actions, such as canceling the Keystone XL pipeline and placing a moratorium on new oil and gas leases on federal lands, fossil fuel extraction has not only continued but has reached record levels.
See More at Substack
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
Puppets execute scripts, not positions. “Co’Feoffee”, remember?
That’s where they rule the livestock ‘on behalf’ of someone else.
Reply
Wisenox
| #
Site uses DrudgeReport style advertising that continually reloads the page.
Reply
S.C.
| #
I don’t know what cofeefee means, I only know it reminds me of the reason I turned off auto-correct years ago. Here’s what I do know:
Leading up to Jan 20, 2021, the United States was funding and actively fighting in exactly zero wars. A gallon of regular unleaded gasoline cost approximately $2.00. The only thing economists could find to criticize was stagnant inflation. Unemployment was at or near all time lows across the board. The Middle East was more peaceful than I’d ever seen, and there were not millions of unvetted illegal aliens crossing the border while Americans were “mandated” to lock-down. (In quotation because that was some bullshit of which I never even considered compliance).
All of that easily overrides the evil nature of typos. Try to change my mind.
Reply
Mike J
| #
Good points, AND there was the attempted assassination. I think that would make an impression…
Reply
VOWG
| #
Fools believe what other fools say. The climate is being destroyed “fools” have to be ignored and scoffed at. Trump, much like you or I, cannot alter the climate in any way.
Reply
Howdy
| #
The most striking feature of a fool in a kings court, is that he is no fool at all.
Reply
aaron
| #
both will do as they are told.
Reply