The Smoking Gun?
Study: ‘Virus’ Is Identical to Normal Cell ‘Structures’.
Dear friends,
Thanks to the diligent efforts of one of my listeners, I received a paper yesterday that puts another nail in the coffin for the existence of SARS-CoV-2. The paper is titled “Appearances Can be Deceiving – Viral-like Inclusions in Covid-19 Negative Renal Biopsies by Electron Microscopy.” The authors are Clarrisa A. Cassol, et al., and the citation is Kidney360 1:824-828, 2020. This is a peer-reviewed journal affiliated with the American Society of Nephrology; in other words, this paper comes squarely from what is called acceptable, mainstream science.
Many of you have probably seen the electron-micrograph pictures of SARS-CoV-2, the ones in black and white, with the black dots within the faint outline of the circle. I have attached two such images from papers that claim these photos show direct evidence of the existence of the virus. These are the pictures that virologists show us, not the computer-generated, colorful images that you see in magazines and on the internet. These are the “real” pictures of the virus, and they are offered as “proof” that the virus exists.
However, it turns out these photos are actually NOT corona viruses, and the CDC, among others, has known this fact since at least 2004.
The above paper examines the evidence used to claim that these images represent viruses, rather than normal “structures” within a cell, particularly sick cells. Here is what the paper says:
“We have observed morphologically indistinguishable inclusions within podocytes and tubular epithelial cells both in patients negative for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as well as in renal biopsies from the pre-COVID-19 era” (emphasis added).
In other words, the researchers saw these same structures in people with no evidence of Covid and in samples they took before Covid even happened, before the virus was said to even exist.
In addition, they say:
“We postulated that endogenous mimickers could be present that are morphologically indistinguishable from SARS-CoV-2 virions ultrastructurally.”
And:
“Viral-like inclusions, consisting both of single vesicles with diameters between 50 and 138 nm, as well as packed groups within larger vesicles, were found in all 15 cases, either in podocytes. Tubular epithelia, or vascular epithelial cells (figure 1).”
In all 15 cases that they examined, they found structures identical to what is being called SARS-CoV-2. They were scattered all over the kidneys and blood vessels; they are not viruses, but normal parts of the cells.
Then they go on to describe how these particles come about:
“A number of potential natural mimickers that can generate intracellular groups of round vesicles mimicking SARS-CoV-2 virions could be listed, the most likely being endocytic vesicles and endosomal components such as microvesicular bodies containing exosomes, among others. Endocytosis leads to the formation of 60-120 nm vesicles, which is within the size range described for SARS-CoV-2 (60-140nm). These endocytic vesicles may be coated by different proteins, one of the most common being clathrin. The presence of coating proteins may be responsible for the presence of an electron-dense area surrounding these vesicles, giving the appearance of a viral corona.”
In other words, remember the famous “corona” on the corona virus? It turns out it’s just a common protein coating on normal vesicles, picking up the dyes in the electron-microscope preparation. The corona appearance is just another creative fiction, dreamed up by virologists and their graphic design teams.
Finally, the paper goes on to say that, naturally, you see more of these particles in sick people than in healthy people, which is exactly what I have been suggesting this past year. Dead and dying cells make these particles in the dying process and partly to get rid of poisons.
But the final nail comes in this quote:
“The potential for confusion of coronavirus particles with normal cellular components was in fact highlighted in a detailed ultrastructural study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of SARS-CoV responsible for the 2003 SARS outbreak.”[1]
In other words, the CDC in 2004 knew that researchers couldn’t reliably know these particles were coronavirus particles.
Not a word has been heard about this since. All virologists use these pictures as proof of the existence of this virus.
It is a fraud, based on junk science, like everything else connected with “Covid 19.”
I will be speaking more about this paper on the webinar this Friday. Please join me.
See more here: drtomcowan.com
Header image: Harvard University
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Guido FORRIER
| #
[email protected]
do these “normal “cell structures have spikes containing protein that damages and attacks the vascular system on a cellular level ?
if no : why do people have these vascular system problems ?
if yes : call it a virus
Reply
JaKo
| #
Hi Guido,
Thank you for pointing out this much deeper problem:
Q: “Does it have certain structures containing “spike protein”?
A: Yes / No => assumed implications.
Any reasoning like this reminds me of binary logic 101; but real world is rarely so simple.
Why do people have certain symptoms? We Don’t Know, but we theorize, that a certain glycoprotein may be the culprit; theory even more substantiated after these experimental CoViD sera containing or producing that protein got into human bodies.
Let’s leave it at that; we have no reason to call something Satan or virus based on this trivia.
Cheers, JaKo
Reply
Tom O
| #
Since the “spike” is the real problem – not the virus, if it exists – the question really is does any of the electron microscope pictures show a spike protein anyway. If they are looking at this picture that we are shown here, how can they tell if there IS a spike? So, why do you assume, if no one has isolated the virus and no one has a true picture of it, that the virus indeed DOES have a spike? Do you also still believe if you leave a tooth under your pillow, the tooth fairy will turn it into a quarter? Not trying to be insulting, just suggesting that you shouldn’t be taking anything on faith that “the COVID experts tell you.
Reply
Guido FORRIER
| #
[email protected]
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/novel-coronavirus-sarscov2-imageshttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11760-021-01912-7
https://www.rferl.org/a/microscope-photos-capture-coronavirus-in-stunning-detail/30518135.html
note that “false” colour is used for visually reason.
Reply
Randy
| #
Tomography images of the trimeric Covid spike protein https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2665-2
Reply
Randy
| #
Spike protein images on the sarscov2 virus https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/novel-coronavirus-sarscov2-images
Reply
Randy
| #
Cryo-EM images of the spike protein https://www.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/blog/coronavirus-the-spike/
Reply
Randy
| #
I now consider Lanka, Cowan & Kaufman clowns. They are going off the deep end on this sarscov2 virus denial nonsense & the peeps here just lap it up. It’s disturbing.
Reply
aaron
| #
smacks of desperation, guess you already been stabbed
Reply
Randy
| #
I wouldn’t inject these depopulator toxic shots if I was paid a million dollars. What in the hell you are talking about? Just because I state facts like the virus is most definitely real does not mean everything. else with this plandemic has been a lie.
Reply
Tom
| #
When have we heard the truth about anything connected to this fake pandemic? Thousands of trusted and proficient doctors have destroyed the CoV-2 narrative with their own studies and conclusions. The above pictures could be almost anything….even a black and white of an oil spill in water…who really knows? I would trust Dr. Cowan before anything coming from the FDA, CDC or the main street news media.
Reply
itsme
| #
man walks down the road to go to the local shop – safe
man walks down the road to go to the local shop with a Kalashnikov AK-47 Assault Rifle – not really safe, a bit concerning.
very mentally unstable man walks down the road to go to the local shop with a Kalashnikov AK-47 Assault Rifle – spike on ‘virus’
Reply
Randy
| #
The pandemic is fake. The deaths attributed to the virus is way overblown. Mask science doesn’t exist. Neither does social distancing or lockdown justifications. What does exist? The virus. The virus HAS been isolated numerous times. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036342/
https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/JVI.00543-20
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247524
https://theconversation.com/i-study-viruses-how-our-team-isolated-the-new-coronavirus-to-fight-the-global-pandemic-133675
And it’s 30,000 base pair genome has been sequenced numerous times. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT560525.1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT019532
Due to electron microscopy technology it has also been photographed numerous times.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/niaid/albums/72157712914621487/with/49557785797/
Denying the virus exists is equivalent to adhering to religious doctrine or willful denial. Anyone who can read science and looks through these links is going to be hard pressed to deny reality. Sorry.
Reply
aaron
| #
convince yourself yet randy?
Reply
Randy
| #
I became convinced for quite awhile that the virus is real but the pandemic is fake. I have also become convinced Kaufman, Lanka & Cowan are embarrassingly wrong on the squeals of “there is no virus” in the face of overwhelming evidence that it was engineered. I post a copious number of links with scientific proof and this is your response? Wow.
Reply
Dan
| #
The jury is still out on that one.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iIkY8wHGRcMz/
Reply
Randy
| #
You provide a reference to a video about Lanka’s nutty denial of viruses? LOL. All of the links i provided above make a mockery of this loony video. Again. Wow.
Reply