The (New) God Delusion

Written by Jeffrey Peel on February 6, 2023. Posted in Current News

The BBC has been releasing several trailers to highlight a new interview with Bill Gates that will be broadcast today:  “Amol Rajan visits Kenya, where Bill Gates through his foundation is supporting local farms and hospitals. Gates talks about wealth and recent conspiracies and controversies.”

‘Controversies’ is a better word. Because most of what Gates has been getting up to of late has been about defending himself about projects and relationships that he’d prefer not to be in the public domain.

There’s his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. And, of course, there’s his bizarre fixation with vaccinating and funding the World Health Organisation.

He’s at pains to get across his “philanthropy” in the Rajan interview. But then there’s his fondness for popularising the likelihood of pandemics.

No other figure bangs on so much about vaccines and the need for humanity to protect itself from pandemics like Bill Gates. Why? Because he can. He has the money to buy attention.

But the inevitable conclusion seems to be that he has some type of weird God Delusion…that he is completely, stark-raving, insane.  Oh and likes making a return on his self-fulfilling prophecies.

Interestingly, Rajan asks him the question: Are you God?  Gate’s answer isn’t especially definitive. It’s given by someone who might just think he is.

And, like the gods, he dithers a bit in terms of how he’s going to proceed. In 2018 it was all-in to mRNA as a salvation – the ‘technology’ that would inject hope into billions of arms in the fight against Covid-19.

So much so that Gates invested $55million into Biontech (the co-developer of Pfizer’s mRNA jab).  Some of that stock was purportedly sold last year at a significant price premium.

That, in essence, is what this piece is about. It’s about how the gods – and their yes-men – set about creating markets for their latest pharmaceutical projects and then mandating their use, without any democratic accountability.

Another of Gates’ chosen up-and-coming companies was Moderna. Had it not been for Covid-19 it was looking like it may end up more like Theranos.

The New New Thing

Theranos and Moderna were very good at hyping their technology (that didn’t work). But that didn’t seem to stop people investing in it. The key difference with Moderna was that it developed a relationship with Gates who is, quite simply, the ultimate king-maker given his near total control of the new philanthropy that is vaccine peddling.

Quite why the investors came does not involve any molecular biochemistry. You will not be required to understand how mRNA technology works (because, clearly, it doesn’t work). Nor will you have to get your head round gain-of-function research or experiments on gibbons. Nope. You’ll just have to understand a little bit about how financial markets work, the process of IPOs, and why investors like sure things.

Let’s get back to the Moderna IPO.

For those of you reading this that don’t know what an IPO is, let me explain. Firstly, it’s an American English acronym that means Initial Public Offer.

In the United Kingdom we used to use the term “going public” or “floating”. It’s what happens when a company offers to trade its stock on a public exchange. The initial public offer details what the company has been up to prior to the IPO.

It also lists all the officers, their backgrounds, details of the products and services, and lots of financial information. The process of going public is typically guided by an army of specialists – law firms acting on behalf of the company, tax advisors, accountants – all of whom earn vast amounts of fee income on the back of the IPO.

But the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees the process and insists that as much information as possible is made available to potential investors. For example, a detailed risk assessment must be articulated in the S1 – the main information prospectus that’s published prior to the IPO on the SEC website.

I’m going to return to IPOs – and specifically the Moderna IPO – a little later in this piece. But at this stage I want you, dear reader, to hold this thought. The IPO represents a liquidity event.

When company stock is listed on a public exchange the shares in that company can be bought and sold. It may be that the stock is relatively illiquid if held by institutions unwilling to sell.

But this, too, has a market effect. It can drive the quoted price up. And this effect is why hedge funds often get involved in buying significant holdings in recently quoted firms. They can dip in and out of the market – selling when the stock price is high and buying back when it’s cheap.

And they tend to work very closely with the main underwriters of IPOs – typically the major investment banks like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs – to fully understand the IPO opportunity.

The investment roadshow is an opportunity for the investment banks to brief institutional investors on the opportunity.  Some 11 investment banks were involved in Moderna’s IPO. They all wanted a share of the action, despite the obvious risks articulated in the Moderna S1:

No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential category of medicines, and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us.

mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new category of medicines.

Now, I’ve hinted in the subtitle of this piece that it’s about the Covid-19 “pandemic”. If you’re subscribing to this site, or even a visitor, you’ll probably know – based on the dozens of previous articles I’ve written, or my Twitter feed – that I’ve always been in the libertarian camp.

Like many others – and many of the campaign groups I’ve supported – I’ve always voiced my opinion that lockdown was the greatest act of self-harm that nation-states could ever have imposed on themselves.

But the reason I’ve written this article is because I’m pretty sure I know now why they were imposed. I’m also pretty sure I know why so many nations coerced their people to take mRNA shots that were known not to be efficacious – and, potentially, even damaging. And, clearly, I’m suggesting that financialization is at the heart of the theory.

Media Myth Peddling.

Over the last couple of weeks there were a number of big social media stories. One was the bizarre non-interview of Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, as he tried to find his way to the entrance of the World Economic Forum conference centre in Davos.

Bourla was intercepted by Avi Yemini of Rebel News, and a few of his colleagues. Bourla said precisely nothing as he was asked a barrage of questions. And the video featuring Bourla’s non-responsive interrogation was viewed, last time I looked, over 20 million times. To put that in context, the BBC news bulletins in the UK reach around 10-15 million in a week.

Clearly, Bourla said nothing to incriminate himself. But seeing him subjected to these questions was, in itself, interesting. He looked a bit pathetic. He couldn’t engage or defend himself because he would have almost certainly have made a fool of himself or caused his PR help to have a word.

But the unanswered questions were left hanging in the air. Questions about the damage his mRNA vaccines were having. Questions about the vaccines failing to stop transmission, failing to provide protection, requiring multiple jabs.

Now, according to George Webb, the self-styled “investigative journalist,” the folks over at Project Veritas were a tad spooked by the fact that the Rebel News people got the Bourla scoop (even though he didn’t actually say anything).

The proof was in the number of video eyeballs. Therefore, enter Jordan Walker, the subject of the Project Veritas sting operation.  Walker, who was secretly video recorded over a dinner date, was apparently a senior scientist at Pfizer who proceeded to spill the beans on Pfizer’s use of “Directed Evolution” – experimentation on monkeys to hone new mRNA vaccine formulas effective on new Covid-19 variants.

This mainstream media style “gotcha” sting got everyone in a bother. Project Veritas pushed the hell out of the video sequences, George Webb spun it all into a new theory about the Boston Consulting Group (all terribly confusing), and everyone went hunting for proof that Walker was, in fact, a pizza thrower, a double-agent, a dodgy consultant, an actor, or all of the above. Meanwhile Pfizer put out some dodgy statements that said nothing much.

Over on mainstream media we had former UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, being “grilled” on morning TV about his breach of the Covid laws at the time he was groping a staffer’s arse and attending parties in Whitehall.

The mainstream media has been popularising a series of side-shows that assiduously ignore the obvious.  Meanwhile the new ‘resistance’ media is using the same ‘gotcha’ tactics (in the case of Project Veritas) that don’t really move the narrative on.

Indeed one is often left with the impression that the alternative media are creating a new, contorted narrative that obfuscates rather than focuses on the heart of the issue – market manipulation and greed and the egos of god-delusionists.

Faster Pandemic Fixes

A few weeks ago I published a short documentary on this site. The video illustrated just one thing. It showed how more people died of a disease called Covid-19 after receiving an experimental vaccine, than before.

There’s no way we can know for sure if they did die of this disease – a disease we’d never heard of before 2019. Many people are reliant on the governments of the world, and organisations funded by ‘philanthropists’, to know what Covid-19 is, and where it came from.

An eager media tells us how to think, how to believe, and what conclusions we should reach about Bill Gates and pandemics. But, the fact remains, many more died of the disease (as defined by health authorities) after the vaccination programme than before – according to their data.

Perhaps the statisticians messed up. Perhaps not. And, meanwhile, excess deaths are going up just as Bill Gates exits the mRNA market.

I remember when I first visited New York City with my wife. We stayed in the Vista Hotel. It was the hotel that was tucked between the twin towers of the World Trade Centre. On leaving the hotel, luggage by our side, we looked up at the towers, reaching to infinity it seemed.

Lots of taxi drivers and limo service touts encircled us. All were offering spectacular deals on rides to the airport. We were saved by the hotel concierge who escorted us to a yellow cab. “The thing about New York City,” he told us, “is that everyone’s an entrepreneur.”

No more so than in Wall Street, it seems. Over the last few decades “entrepreneurs” have dreamt up some incredible get rich quick schemes. Everything has become financialised. Businesses and industries have been transformed to feed the entrepreneurs of Wall Street. Slow moving industries have been forced to be fast.

Vaccines were never fast. It took forever to make vaccines. All that testing, brewing, cajoling of nasty pathogens to become kindlier, and to work with the human immune system, to protect. But there’s little money to be made with that business model. Very limited prospects to IPO that methodology.

Hence, a new breed of healthcare companies came into being. These were companies founded by visionaries who could talk the talk of Wall Street. The founders much preferred the company of investment banks than cancer patients. They knew how to work the networking opportunities at Davos rather than a tropical diseases summit in Lesotho.  Case in point: Moderna.

Moderna’s IPO was in late 2018.  The company unashamedly built itself on mRNA (messenger RNA “technology”).  In effect, Moderna modelled itself more on a Silicon Valley technology start-up than a typical drugs company. mRNA, it claimed, was essentially software.

This is taken from a long document. Read the rest here thenewera.uk

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.