The Most Dangerous International Treaty Ever Proposed
This is just a quick post to recommend an outstanding article about the World Health Organization (WHO)’s Pandemic Treaty that is currently being planned which would totally obliterate nations’ sovereignty not only about health related issues, but also about privacy and censorship, among other monstrosities
The article is titled The Most Dangerous International Treaty Ever Proposed and it is written by a gifted writer in Molly Kingsley (alternate link to the article via ZeroHedge).
I have touched upon the subject of the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty in Part 2 of my series The Covid-19 – Holocaust Comparison (just search for the header ‘The WHO’s Pandemic Treaty’), for it is one of the most important topics of our time in this crazy world.
Click the link above to see the ugly details about the proposed treaty.
Molly Kingsley’s Brownstone Institute article really showcases the broader destructive implications the treaty would bring about.
Therefore, it is very much worth your time.
Update/Teaser: I am currently hard at work on Part 5 of my The Covid-19 – Holocaust Comparison review series which should be published later this week.
It will mostly focus on those so-called “fact-checking” sites which are employed to “counter disinformation” about Covid-19 and just about every other kind of news.
As an independent journalist and author, I will always bring you the truth because I know you can handle it!
See more here substack.com
Header image: Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Lorraine
| #
Pro abortion communities scream, “Bodily autonomy, women have the right to control their body”, even though there’s another unique human being involved.
Why then don’t they demand the same for all people who want to maintain the right to bodily autonomy against vaccination with an unknown substance without consent?
Reply