The Ivermectin Games
In the COVID-19 era we have been askedabout Ivermectin many times, particularly in 2020 and 2021.
We addressed it in a COVID FAQs presentation in March 2021 because people in the health freedom community kept enquiring as to why I was not promoting the drug. For us the foundational issue was that COVID-19 was not a novel disease and the cases were defined by non-diagnostic tests as I explained in my 2020 video “What Is A Covid-19 Case?“.
During our two decades in the medical system, neither Mark nor I ever prescribed Ivermectin and it always seemed odd that it became an alleged treatment for COVID-19 and the phantom virus ‘SARS-CoV-2’. However, like the “lab leak” narrative, Ivermectin has been a permitted alternative narrative that everyone seems to know about.
In this video we take a look at the history of one of the biggest-selling drugs in the world, including the 2020 mainstream virology paper that claimed it was an “anti-viral” agent.
While that paper was able to be shared tens of millions times, by contrast those of us who discussed the virologists’ experiments were receiving strikes and bans on Big Tech platforms. There is something very suspicious about the Ivermectin narrative especially as its mythology continues to grow with new claims that it could be a treatment for cancer.
See more here Substack
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Wisenox
| #
I recently looked up treatments for mealy-worms in soil. Their list included Ivermectin.
It was used in hen houses, but was found to be toxic to humans, and literature shows that it permeates the blood brain barrier and crosses breast milk.
Her and her husband show up in the UN circles of celebrity covid doctors and sites. Says some good stuff, but ultimately fails to actually look into the vaccine patents. For example, she doesn’t mention picornaviruses or other techniques of crossing the blood brain barrier, even though the MSM is trying to call them viroids.
She does bring up flaws in virology, which is good, but again misses the mark when she fails to correlate Hippocrate’s ‘influenza’ with the symbolism of free speech and ‘influence’. Ancient texts do not mention seasonal flus.
She either doesn’t get it, or wishes to avoid the actual topics (insider).
Reply
Tim
| #
Interesting.
I know of 4 people personally that were getting sicker and sicker in 2021 and 2022 until using ivermectin. They each cleared up in two days and fully healthy in four.
Anecdotal? Yes
Hard to explain though.
Reply
Joel
| #
The devil is always in the details….
Reply