The Human World & the Misuse of Science
In 1687, Isaac Newton published his monumental book, Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, often shortened to Principia, in which he presented the foundation for classical mechanics and universal gravitation
The book dazzled natural philosophers all over Europe and the British American colonies, and was a milestone in the so-called “Scientific Revolution” of observing and analyzing the natural world.
Shortly thereafter, natural philosophers began to contemplate the possibility that Newton’s method for observing and measuring bodies in motion could be applied to the human body, mind, and society.
It didn’t take long for some critical observers—most notably Jonathan Swift—to note that this endeavor could quickly become preposterous and pernicious.
In his Gulliver’s Travels, published in 1726, Swift depicted the scientists and astronomers on the Island of Laputa as having completely taken leave of common sense and practical knowledge due to their obsession with abstract theories and their pursuits that are often more harmful than beneficial.
In 1936, the Austrian-Czech philosopher, Edmund Husserl, published The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology in which he pointed out that, in our world of “lived experience,” we rarely apply scientific principles.
For example, when someone smiles at you, you don’t see the person’s facial nerves and muscles working together to contort the face— you see an expression of joy or sympathy, tenderness, or desire.
Only a moronic weirdo would try to reduce the experience of receiving a smile to the measurement and action of nerves and muscles.
Such was the sort of dummy that Evelyn Waugh satirized in the character of Professor Otto Silenus—a young German architect— in the 1928 novel Decline and Fall. As Professor Silenus describes “the problem of architecture”:
The problem of architecture as I see it,’ he told a journalist who had come to report on the progress of his surprising creation of ferro-concrete and aluminium, ‘is the problem of all art—the elimination of the human element from the consideration of form.
The only perfect building must be the factory, because that is built to house machines, not men. I do not think it is possible for domestic architecture to be beautiful, but I am doing my best.
All ill comes from man,’ he said gloomily; ‘please tell your readers that. Man is never beautiful; he is never happy except when he becomes the channel for the distribution of mechanical forces.’
he result of commissioning guys like Otto Silenus—a thinly veiled caricature of Walter Gropius—to design major buildings is that no one wants to walk around and hang out in cold modernist cityscapes in which the human element has been eliminated.
Instead, tens of millions of tourists flock to the old cities of Europe that were built in accordance with the “lived experience” of their inhabitants, and not abstract “scientific” principles.
To understand why, compare the way you feel when sitting in an old piazza in Rome, surrounded by Baroque buildings, to the way you feel sitting in a modern airport.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, when the world was de facto governed by a group of so-called “scientific experts,” I often thought about the idiot scientists on the Island of Laputa and of Professor Otto Silenus.
Generally speaking, I believe that “scientific experts”—with their God of Scientism—should never be given positions of executive authority when it comes to making decisions about complex public policy issues.
The scientists should have one seat at the table, along with people who understand the limitations of empirical science in managing human affairs.
See more here thefocalpoints.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi John Leake,
Tou began your article: “In 1687, Isaac Newton published his monumental book, Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, often shortened to Principia, in which he presented the foundation for classical mechanics and universal gravitation The book dazzled natural philosophers all over Europe and the British American colonies, and was a milestone in the so-called “Scientific Revolution” of observing and analyzing the natural world.”
Please explain why Newton seems to ignore Galileo’s previous book.
Have a good day
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Editor,
My comment has disappeared AGAIN! Why?
Reply
Aaron
| #
why not?
Reply
Wilson Sy
| #
The Principia was written as mathematical theorems, not empirical science. It would be called theoretical physics today. It presents no “method for observing and measuring bodies in motion”, which was the discovery of classical mechanics of Galileo. Newton’s gravitation hypothesis explains Kepler’s laws which summarized millennia of astronomical observations. The “Scientific Revolution” was already established by the geocentric observations of Copernicus. Isaac Newton was standing “on the shoulders of giants”, as he admitted himself and later noted by Stephen Hawkings in his compendium with that title.
Reply
Wilson Sy
| #
Sorry, I mean heliocentric not geocentric.
Reply