The Great Vaccine Scam
“South Africa suspends Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine rollout after researchers report minimal protection against variant” announces the headline of a recent Washington Post report.
The article’s opening sentence reads as follows:
“South Africa will suspend use of the coronavirus vaccine being developed by Oxford University and AstraZeneca after researchers found that it provided ‘minimal protection’ against mild to moderate coronavirus infections caused by the new variant first detected in that country.”
The information conveyed by the above exposes the gargantuan fraud that has been perpetrated upon humanity in the name of COVID-19.
Even though many people will be deeply disappointed and disheartened by what happened in South Africa, the news should not have come as a surprise to anyone, since the vaccine failure was completely predictable and inevitable.
Here is the truth: It is not possible to devise an effective vaccine for the type of virus that causes COVID-19. Why? For the very reason that AstraZeneca’s vaccine has failed in South Africa and will fail elsewhere as well.
Coronavirus is a type of virus that mutates widely and because of that it is impossible to come up with a vaccination protocol that would stop its spread.
Every bona fide virologist knows this. And yet the public has not been advised of this. Quite to the contrary, this crucial information has been actively suppressed.
Rather than being told the truth, we were commanded to hunker down in lengthy lockdowns and ordered to wait until the vaccine was found. Once that happened, they told us, we would be able to prevail over the virus and get our lives back. Until quite recently, this was the official narrative propagated by the governing elites around the world.
Consequently, billions of people pinned their hopes on the vaccine and desperately waited for its deliverance. At the same time, governments channeled billions of dollars into the development of these fake concoctions and a number of pharma executives and scientists became billionaires on the news of “progress” and “successful” trials.
While some were getting fabulously wealthy, the frightened and gullible public was kept in the dark about the racket. Sadly, most people apparently lack the will and independence of mind to go beyond the propaganda and do their own research. It does not help, of course, that the establishment has done its best to censor and suppress the information that goes against its official narrative.
The first news that showed that all was not well came when the Chinese vaccine Sinovac was found to be only fifty percent effective in Brazil. Bad as it was, we can be sure that even the paltry fifty percent figure was tweaked upwards by a joint effort of the Brazilian authorities who purchased the vaccine and the vaccine’s Chinese manufacturer. They lied because it is in the interest of both parties to do so. The government authorities needed to cover for their incompetence of spending hundreds of millions of dollars on a bad product while the manufacturer wants to protect his profits. The likely truth is that the Chinese vaccine is for all practical purposes useless and possibly dangerous due to potential side effects for which it has not been adequately tested in the extremely short time frame in which it was developed.
Tellingly, the Chinese manufacturer of the shoddy Sinovac vaccine initially claimed an effectiveness of nearly one hundred percent. Their claims were in line with those of western manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines. We can be sure – given the mutating nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus – that the vaccines developed by western pharma companies are equally as useless as that of their Chinese counterpart. We have already seen clear evidence of it from South Africa. In the aforementioned piece by the Washington Post we learn that when in South Africa the new “variant became dominant in the country in November, the vaccine [by Oxford-AstraZeneca] provided no significant protection against illness…” South African researchers estimated that the effectiveness of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is ten percent.
Think about it: The vaccine is ten percent effective! And this likely is still an exaggeration as all the parties involved try to save face.
But even at ten percent the vaccine would be worse than useless, because while it offers virtually no protection it potentially carries serious side effects for which it has not been adequately tested.
Because of the potential dangers inherent in this kind of medical product, it normally takes around six years to develop a vaccine that ban be considered reasonably safe. According to Business Insider “vaccines often take years, and sometimes even decades, to develop, test, and approve for public use.”
It was only in April of last year that CNN claimed that a year and a half timeframe of producing a vaccine would raise safety concerns:
“Eighteen months might sound like a long time, but in vaccine years, it’s a blink. That’s the long end of the Trump administration’s time window for developing a coronavirus vaccine, and some leaders in the field say this is too fast – and could come at the expense of safety.”
This was one of those rare occasions on which CNN said something that was actually true. The piece goes on to quote real experts in the field like Dr. Peter Hotez, an expert on infectious disease and vaccine development at Baylor College of Medicine who said: “Tony Fauci is saying a year to 18 months – I think that’s optimistic. Maybe if all the stars align, but probably longer.”
Dr. Paul Offit, the co-inventor of the rotavirus vaccine, had this to say: “When Dr. Fauci said 12 to 18 months, I thought that was ridiculously optimistic. And I’m sure he did, too.”
To rush, therefore, COVID vaccines on the market after mere nine months of development is beyond irresponsible. To do this with “vaccines” that their manufacturers know cannot be ultimately effective is outright criminal.
Being part of the establishment, the vaccines manufacturers will not get called out and punished for their misdeeds. Their face (and their business model) will be saved. The data showing the ineffectiveness of their products will be tweaked and shown in the best light possible. They will then offer to devise boosters for different variants, which will be as ineffective in stopping COVID-19 as their original vaccine was. But never mind this: it will be excellent for their business, since each new variant represents more than seven billion potential customers. Western pharma conglomerates are known to be among the greatest scam artists within the system, and they will exploit the COVID scam to line their pockets in a big way.
While the effectiveness of the vaccines to protect against COVID is questionable at best, there is no doubt that they have already produced some serious side effects. One of these side effects happens to be death. In a number of countries hundreds of elderly people died after having received their shots. This side effect became so troublesome that some governments – Norway, for instance – issued new advisories and guidelines concerning vaccinations for older individuals. They did this even though the elderly were initially the first group targeted for this treatment. But rather then benefiting from it, many seniors were killed by the very thing they were told would protect their lives.
Given that it was never possible to stop a highly mutating virus by vaccination – which was something that has been well known – the whole COVID vaccine enterprise was fraud from the beginning and a dangerous one at that. The best we can hope for is that that these fake vaccines being peddled by the unscrupulous governments and greedy pharma companies are ineffective. Being administered on the order of millions of doses a day, we can only pray that the potential side effects of these untested concoctions hastily cobbled together by ruthless profiteers will not produce the greatest man-made medical calamity in history.
Vasko Kohlmayer [email] was born and grew up in former communist Czechoslovakia. He is the author of The West in Crisis: Civilizations and Their Death Drives.
Read more at www.globalresearch.ca
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Roger Higgs
| #
Excellent article, thank you.
” the whole COVID vaccine enterprise was fraud from the beginning”
Reply
Roger Higgs
| #
Excellent article, thank you.
“the whole COVID vaccine enterprise was fraud from the beginning”
Ditto ‘man-made warming’ …
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348369922
Reply
Richard Bassett
| #
I think that this article struggles even if the salient point may be true, that the new vaccines are useless in stopping the spread of Covid-19. However, while I would stipulate that most politicians and their apparatchiks have proven to be useless and craven fools who are clearly out of control as they demonstrate no awareness of the principles underlying the fragile nature of liberal democracy, it remains the case that the author and the rest of us need to address the question of whether the vaccines do accomplish two things which means that they are not wholly useless and they are:
1) the vaccines do appear to be effective in reducing the severity of Covid-19 and in so doing this removes the argument that hospitals will become overwhelmed and reduces the death toll; and
2) the vaccine narrative, however much falsehood there is in it, does provide a justification for ending the disaster that is lockdown.
Given the realities of where we are, it seems incumbent on those of us who are lockdown sceptics to propose solutions that reflect the current state of affairs and supporting the vaccine distribution may be the least worst option.
Reply
Judith Day
| #
I have seen claims but no evidence that the ‘vaccines’ reduce the severity of C19.
The death rate, certainly in the UK, seems similar to that seen in previous bad influenza years.
A cost benefit analysis of lockdown would be the most sensible, mature and obvious way out of lockdown; but it is not the one we are likely to have, given the pitifully low intelligence and morals of our politicians.
Reply
Alan
| #
I have not seen any evidence to support the view that the vaccines reduce the severity of the disease. Surely, what we all expect from a vaccine is that it prevents us having the disease. This is effectively what the measles vaccine does, but I understand that about 3% can still have some minor symptoms. Covid has more in common with flu and those vaccines are only about 50% effective, but what does that mean exactly? In the UK several thousand people die with flu every year. What I would like to know is how many of these received the vaccine, but that information seems well hidden. Why is that? I think the same applies to Covid, we want to know how many deaths it will prevent. Flu and covid are not pleasant but there is a big difference between a few of days not feeling well and dying.
Regardless of the effectiveness of the vaccines I think all governments will use them as the way back to normal. They have no choice. I expect the disease will remain with us and we will have to accept it just as we do with flu. The lockdowns have to end and cannot come back. Government will say they did all the could to excuse the chaos they have created to the economy and to people’s lives and health.
Reply
Leonard Winokur
| #
My late mother who was a consultant pathologist, and whose specialist fields were haematology and microbiology, told me this. That it is impossible to produce to a vaccine against coronaviruses for this very reason – that they’re constantly mutating. I’ve known this since at least the 1980s, and possibly 1970s when I was still at high school.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Good article. If science had been followed, this would not have happened. For example, see here,
COVID-19: Vaccine ‘Not Possible’ For A Virus Not Yet Quantifiable (https://principia-scientific.com/covid-19-vaccine-not-possible-for-a-virus-not-yet-identified/) published on PSI August 6, 2020.
To get out of this misery, consider a possible option (http://www.drug-dissolution-testing.com/?p=3636).
Reply
Robert
| #
Superb article. How anyone can take a supposed vaccine that has not been thoroughly tested with animals and rushed out within one year is beyond me.
I feel so sorry for the gullible old folk who thought it was just another flu shot.
Reply
Doug Harrison
| #
This old fellow is not of the gullible kind and I cannot accept the idea that I should be used as a guinea pig because:
a) this is not a vaccine by any legal definition.
b) it will make permanent alteration to my DNA and
c) no one knows what the downstream effects of (b) are and even at 85 years of age, when I might be altruistic enough to do it for science, I most certainly will not.
Reply
Jay Long
| #
The fact is, no such thing as infectious pathogen they call virus who nobody on earth ever isolated from supposedly sick people’s bodily fluids as pure-state to have satisfied or fulfilled Koch’s Postulate. If so, NEITHER such thing as infectious disease.
Why I don’t find article of what I all said?
So what supposedly vaccines are for? It’s all freaking scam as deception to inject people with eggs of cultured bacterial pathogens ie Streptococcus or Toxoplasmas or Trypanosomas, Hydra Vulgaris in the Covid shot.
Reply