The Great Covid Virus Lie And The Data That Shows It

Written by Michael Wallach on August 28, 2023. Posted in Current News

I confess. I still think it’s worth calling out the lie behind the covid cult

Mike Yeadon (pictured), former VP and Chief Scientist for Respiratory Disease at Pfizer, seems to agree.

He just penned a piece pleading with the scientific community to join him in exposing the ruse at the heart of the covid narrative: there was no virus.

There never was a virus. It was all a fraud.

He’s not alone. For three years now, Tom Cowan, Andy Kaufman, Amandha Vollmer, and so many other doctors, scientists and journalists, have made clear that the virology “experiments” justifying the covid narrative were profoundly fraudulent: that no “SARS-CoV-2 virus” was ever actually found.

They have been met with a chorus from the mainstream that has shouted them down and told them to shut up and trust the science, not critique it, and from much of the “critical community” that continually shrinks away from calling out the Great Lie behind the Great Reset, claiming that the science is just too hard to comprehend, and that they will lose their audiences if they speak about it.

So still we sit in this stew of lies, with nary a nabob to call the emperor naked.

But if we can take just a moment to look at the all-cause mortality data, the case that a deadly new disease ever ravaged the world in 2020 reveals itself as entirely absurd.

The mortality data just isn’t consistent with contagion.

Take a look at this chart below:

Could it be any clearer?

At the top, we see the “death spike” from 2020 in the UK. At the bottom, we see the Midazolam prescription rate spike in the UK – Midazolam being one of the key drugs forced upon hospital patients as a preface to ventilating them, a process which was later shown to result in 90 percent of the patients dying.

Does that look like contagion to you? Or does it look like, perhaps, all those people were killed by the hospital system?

The graph is from the UK, but similar graphs exist in the US and other parts of the world.

Below, for example, is the “covid” death spike that can be seen in the US mortality data from 2014 to 2020 – from dissident Professor Dennis Rancourt’s extraordinary paper on all-cause mortality here.

Do notice how the death spike in 2020 comes immediately AFTER the red line indicating the date lockdowns were ordered and hospital protocols were changed.

Access to prescription data over time for Midazolam is harder to come by in the US, but here and here are a few of the many reports that came out during the period about how US hospitals were ventilating people in such large numbers that the nation was running out of paralytic drugs.

As these and other graphs show, here is what happened in 2020, all of which is totally uncontested and entirely inconsistent with the spread of a contagious deadly disease. 

Here is a chart from the World Economic Forum itself, which I believe they copied from the Financial Times.

Notice the following uncontested fact: deaths were entirely normal the entire winter and early spring, across the entire world, and then deaths suddenly spiked, in every locale where they spiked, immediately after lock-downs and the associated change in hospital protocols dictated by the WHO and other medical authorities.

There was no gradually rising curve that would suggest a new contagious disease was spreading.

Deaths just suddenly spiked up in disparate locations, as if SARS-COV-2 viruses had been making their way undercover through the nations of the world, then hiding underground like some kind of terrorist network, waiting until all their little virus watches all chimed in agreement that it was time to attack.

The idea that we would see normal death rates the entire winter across the world and then see a sudden and massive coordinated spike in mortality due to the spreading of a contagious disease is preposterous.

It’s consistent with a huge bout of toxic air pollution suddenly let into the atmosphere, a nuclear explosion, an alien invasion and/or organized murder, but it is not consistent with a contagious pathogen.

How did this pathogen so cleverly jump from person to person without killing anyone until it was around the entire world, and then suddenly kill all these people at the same time? How did it coordinate with its other virus cousins in other countries not to hurt anyone until the agreed upon date?

If there truly were a contagious respiratory disease floating through the air, starting in the fall of 2019 in China, we would have seen at the very least, a steady increase in the numbers of people dying during flu season, but we saw no such thing.

As far as world mortality figures go, 2020 was actually a mild season for all cause mortality, until the day the WHO declared a pandemic, and hospitals changed their protocols, at which point people started dying in large numbers. 

Then….deaths suddenly plummeted, again across the entire world, returning to a normal death rate after less than two months – despite no “cure” having been found.

Were a contagious disease to have been ripping through the world, killing people left and right, deaths would have continued to climb until a cure was found or “immunity” to it having gradually been achieved – but no new cure was heralded and put into place around the world in late May of 2020, and no imaginary model of immunity could possibly explain deaths falling right back to normal over the course of less than two weeks, in city after city, nation after nation.

No, a sudden stop in deaths in the same two weeks around the world is not consistent with a gradual gaining of immunity, it is indicative that something stopped the killing.  Could it be that hospitals stopped shoving their dangerous protocols literally down people’s throats?

Coincidentally, that is exactly what happened (also see here). But I am getting ahead of myself.

Notice how a rise in deaths occurred only in highly localized areas. We saw a significant rise in deaths in France, but not Germany, the Netherlands but not Norway. Europe but not Africa. How could a contagious disease not spread in similar and even neighboring places?

Why did deaths increase drastically in NYC but barely a nod in San Francisco? Why Milan but not Rome? Why Paris, but not Luxembourg? Such localized mortality increases are not consistent with a contagious disease spreading through the world population.

The entire idea of a contagious disease is that it spreads from person to person. It’s the height of absurdity to claim that a disease spread through Europe, but skipped whole cities, whole nations, and even large parts of nations.

“Airplanes?” (as RFK Jr. stammered to suggest in an interview with Rancourt) is not an answer – first, much of inter-European traffic is on rails, buses and cars, but more important, flights were just as common between London (high deaths) and its vacation market Lisbon (low deaths), as they were between London (high deaths) and Milan (high deaths), or just as frequent between Paris (high deaths) and Berlin (low deaths).

Who would argue that travel between Milan (high deaths) and Rome (low deaths) was less frequent than travel between Milan and other places? This sure would have to be one picky virus! Perhaps it prefers growing in bodies who eat cold meat spreads over places that eat more sauce-based foods?

No, France was high in deaths. Perhaps sunnier places do better than colder ones? No, Spain far outpaced Germany in the death race. Hmmm. Perhaps this is an inane line of reasoning?

According to the (now widely recognized as entirely invalid) “testing” that happened, all these nations showed similar numbers of “infected” people. So one could argue, I suppose, that the super sneaky virus travelled through certain countries but that these people were “immune” to it, yet still passing it on (a whole other can of absurd-worms).

So, for instance, the French were not immune to it, but the Germans were.  But why would that be the case?

Why would the Portuguese be immune, but not the Spanish?

The Norwegians, but not the Dutch?

The Danish but not the Swedes?

Have we reached peak absurdity yet?

In the US, most states saw no rise in deaths at all – even though they “tested” for having the virus at the same rate as places where many died. For instance, California saw no large rise in all-cause mortality, while New York and New Jersey led the nation.

Are Californians immune to the virus but New Yorkers aren’t? Everyone I know who lives in California moved there from New York at some point.

But let’s go on. Below is a chart of all-cause mortality in each of the 50 states from (no less a place than the heart of the beast itself) Johns Hopkins Professor Genevieve Brandt’s extraordinary paper on US mortality data (showing that even including the rise in deaths in April of 2020, no statistically significant change in mortality was even seen in the US, and that the “excess death” figures bandied about had been manipulated statistically by suppressing the overall population number).

Note how these graphs mirror all the other graphs we’ve seen, and how the rise in deaths occurred in places that locked people in their homes and kept them isolated from each other, but largely did not occur in places that didn’t do that.

Are we to believe that a contagious disease spread faster among isolated people in New Jersey than in Des Moines or Salt Lake City where people continued mingling in their normal lives?  The five states named in black are the only ones that never instituted “stay-at-home orders.”

What do you notice about their mortality rates as opposed to NYC and New Jersey, which aggressively locked their citizens in their homes?

When this simple and uncontested data is looked on as a whole, it’s impossible to account for the rise in deaths as the result of contagion without contorting one’s thinking into absurdity.

These “viruses” would have had to zip around the world, going from person to person without making them sick, carefully waiting and checking their billions and billions of watches, and then suddenly springing upon only certain populations at a furious pace, but refusing to spread beyond key municipal borders, and then suddenly halting their own spread, stopping dead in their tracks, nearly everywhere on earth.

The “viruses” would have to have timed themselves to attack on nearly the exact day after the lockdowns, and to have specifically attacked people in places that locked down, but not so much those who continued to mingle with each other.

They would have to be the single smartest, most conniving sub-microscopic particle network in the history of fictional entities.

You have to have been fully hypnotized into hysteria to believe this is what happened.

Of course, it’s worth pointing out as well that no contagious “SARS-CoV-2” virus has ever, to this day, actually been isolated in any laboratory in the world. None. Ever. Not once. What is being sold at labs around the world is a lab-created mixture of snot and numerous other ingredients only claimed, but not a single time proven, to contain within it “SARS-CoV-2.”

This too is absurd. And we don’t even have to mention that “case” counts were generated by a PCR “test” whose invalidity has been so beaten to the ground most thinking people do now actually realize it was a scam.

So not only does the contagious virus theory of 2020 require an absolutely fantastical story about billions of viruses acting in concert to pull off a deadly (if brief) uprising against random nations that attempted to lock them down, timed to the very political dates in which hospital protocols were changed, the theory’s supporters must admit they can’t even find a single one of these billions of clever perpetrators in a lab.

What has now been proven however, is that there are very real reasons why we saw a mortality spike after the lock-downs and change in hospital protocols in March of 2020: the lock-downs and change in hospital protocols in March of 2020!

This is taken from a long document. Read the rest here substack.com

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.