The Global Race Towards Full Vaccination
Scientists initially estimated that 60 to 70 percent of a population would have to acquire resistance to Covid-19 in order for herd immunity to take effect, a threshold that has been revised upwards since the start of the year with 80 to 85 percent quoted in some cases.
Despite the ever-higher immunity threshold discussed by scientists, Israel’s Covid-19 case count started to tumble when 40 percent of its population received at least one jab and now 59.3 percent of its inhabitants are fully vaccinated. The country’s reproduction rate has been around 0.5 in recent weeks and it appears to be on track to emerge from the pandemic, suggesting that initial herd immunity estimates carried some accuracy.
With 45.4 percent of its inhabitants fully vaccinated, Bahrain comes second on the list.
In the United States, 40.2 percent of people have been fully vaccinated (though do not forget that almost half of unvaccinated Americans have natural immunity from prior infection).
In this case, full vaccination refers to all doses prescribed by the vaccination protocol with data only available for countries reporting the breakdown of their doses.
As Scott Morefield wrote recently, Blue-state lockdown-lovers drunk on their own power like Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer who insist on a 70 percent vaccination rate in order to ease up on mandates and restrictions are ignoring the science completely in order to hold their people hostage to an unobtainable, unnecessary goal.
Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon at Johns Hopkins Hospital debunked the desire among some health officials, sometimes referred to as “zero COVID,” that COVID-19 can be eradicated completely.
Well, unfortunately, we have this perception now that’s being created by some public health leaders that we need to reach total eradication. We’re not gonna get to total absolute risk elimination. That is a false goal and quite honestly it’s being used now to manipulate the public. We heard today again from our public health leaders that if we get to 70% vaccination, then we can start seeing restrictions removed. That’s dishonest. Most of the country is at herd immunity.
Other parts will get there later this month. San Francisco had 12 cases yesterday, most asymptomatic. What do you call that? I call that herd immunity. And I think what’s happening is our public health leaders are dismissing natural immunity from prior infection, which changes the path to get to more population immunity. It invokes mandates, it means kids may have to get it and it demonizes those that are hesitant rather than respecting their decision.
Indeed, you don’t have to have a medical degree to know that the formula for herd immunity has always been vaccinated plus natural immunity, but then again, when have Democrats ever been good at math?
See more here: zerohedge.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Herb Rose
| #
The PCR test is useless. If it gives a false reading or a positive reading it is wrong because it test for sequences found in humans. Starting with a false test you then change the number of cycles changing the results. Since all the data is inaccurate any interpretation using it is inaccurate.
Initially all deaths were due to Covid-19 then this useless standard was changed so now so any death after vaccination is of natural causes. The data reported for deaths due to the disease is a continuing string of lies to promote a vaccination agenda.even, though they admit the vaccine will not stop you from getting the disease or dying from it.
Any article based on false data is useless. The only meaningful data that can be used is the comparison of hospitalization and total death rate.
Reply
Terry Shipman
| #
Yes, my first reaction when I read, “San Francisco had 12 cases yesterday, most asymptomatic,” my first thought was sure, more useless PCR tests that were never designed to diagnose any particular disease. I am glad my doctor advised me not to get the shot because of my blood clot history. I wasn’t planning on getting it in any event. But now I can honestly say I can’t get it, doctor’s orders.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
It’s actually pretty funny. Any vaccine that does not prevent you from getting infected and die IS NOT A VACCINE. How is that hard to understand? The high numbers of “cases” after vaccination should make everybody suspicious.
AND, they need to stop PCR testing, treat symptoms with therapeutics, and all of this would go away.
However, with so many people jabbed with the vaccine-that-is-not (let’s call it Voldermort), they are going to blame the following ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) illnesses and deaths on the “variants” which they pretend to detect everywhere (it’s called the strains that came with the new flu season, but variants is more scary). All of the autoimmune diseases will be blamed on nefarious and scary effects of Covid and all other illnesses and deaths blamed on coincidence. Voldermort will never be blamed for anything as they claim it’s 95-100% effective (which is impossible for experimental and improperly tested experimental medical treatments).
Reply
Lualaba
| #
The going meaning of herd immunity was an adequate portion of the population with natural immunity for the population at large to be negligibly vulnerable. it had nothing to do with injections. It was determined by tests for natural defenses (antibodies/T cells) done when and where the spread of the disease in question had recently ceased. Based on these studies the going estimate for herd immunity to viruses was at approx. 60%.
Reply
very old white guy
| #
got to keep the lie going.
Reply
Alan
| #
The plan is working well, and the bank accounts of the pharmaceutical companies are busting at the seams.
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
“Scientists initially estimated that 60 to 70 percent of a population would have to acquire resistance to Covid-19 in order for herd immunity to take effect, a threshold that has been revised upwards since the start of the year with 80 to 85 percent quoted in some cases.”
This is BS because herd immunity depends on the genetic diversity of the population. The US is quite diverse and Norway not. Herd immunity in the US is at 18–25% but for Norway might be around 80–85%. It is bad and unprofessional science to think that one size fits all, but that is how our nefarious advisor doctors, er, Faustus Fauci the leader, abuse the science. They always chose the junk science that sounds the most alarming.
This raises the question of why they are pushing the emergency use of a vaccine long after the non-existent pandemic is over? There must be another agenda here. Yeah, and it’s not in our favor. Ideas and benefits so good, they would like to mandate them.
As there has not been a defined virus at all and the PCR test is egregiously nonspecific, for all intents and purposes, the flu season has been renamed “Covid-19.” They are excited that the “cases” hVE dropped off recently, but that is what happens after the flu season EVERY YEAR. How is the public so suddenly stupid and have no memory of our lives?
Reply