The FDA cover-up that led to the approval of the Pfizer vaccine
As I’ve been documenting for the past year, the COVID experts have been contradicting themselves six ways from Sunday. As charlatans, they’re abject failures. They can’t keep their own story straight. Thanks to an alert reader, I’ve come across a new blockbuster.
BY THEIR OWN STANDARDS, the FDA should never have allowed the Pfizer COVID vaccine to be shot into a single arm. The Agency’s Emergency Use Authorization was a crime—according to their own data.
Here we go.
The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]
It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.
A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”
Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.
The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than no vaccine at all—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.
To make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the vaccine clinical trial.
The researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some volunteers.
The billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?
If it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success. It protected people against the virus.
But as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn’t the case at all.
So now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just quoted: “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases].”
“Well, you see, we can’t say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. They’re in limbo. We want to keep them in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and we’ll never get approval for the vaccine.”
What does “suspected cases” mean? It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.
However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?
Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.
By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.
That’s the way cases are counted.
These several thousand volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either COVID-19 cases or they weren’t. Which is it?
The official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to throw the data from all those suspected cases in the garbage and ignore them. Poof. Gone.
Why do I say that?
Because if the FDA had paid serious attention to the several thousand “suspected cases,” they never would have authorized the vaccine for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.
Which they didn’t.
This is called a crime.
“But…but it’s not that simple. This is a complex situation. It’s a gray area.”
“No. It isn’t. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug, nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was supposed to cure, wouldn’t you cancel the trial and go back to the drawing board?”
“You mean if we were being honest? That’s a joke, right? We’re not honest. Don’t you get it?”
Yes. I get it. You’re criminals. Killers.
But wait. There’s more. The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.
In fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a slippery comment: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”
Translation: You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting to the vaccine. So we’re going to ignore this whole mess and pretend it’s of no importance.
Back in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine groups of their clinical trials.
It’s called cooking the data. It’s a way of writing off and ignoring COVID symptoms in the vaccine group—and instead saying, “The vaccine is safe and effective.”
And the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a category called “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases,” and throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.
I’m speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.
Unless fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the vaccine were and are the true goals.
Finally: When you have “suspected cases,” and their ultimate status depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each “suspected case” becomes an actual case or no case at all.
Perhaps these “suspected cases” in the clinical trial were tested, and many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID cases—but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they were tested.
Or if you really don’t want to know whether “suspected cases” are actual cases, you don’t test them. You leave them in a convenient limbo and park them, never to be seen again.
Either way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the test. Saying “we don’t know” is nothing more than a con and a hustle.
I’d love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one. Here is how the conversation might go:
“So you’re saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn’t be adjudicated one way or another?”
“That’s right. Their PCR tests were ‘indeterminate’.”
“That says something devastating about the test itself.”
“Well, sometimes you just can’t tell whether it’s positive or negative.”
“I see. And this ‘indeterminate’ result occurred in SEVERAL THOUSAND suspected cases.”
“I guess so, yes.”
“You know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases. A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for the virus itself in a more direct way.”
“No. That wouldn’t work.”
“Why not?”
“Because…the actual virus…”
“Because no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
“Right.”
“So tell me—what does that indicate? I’ll tell you what it indicates. You can’t prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists.
“I have to go. I’m late for a meeting.”
“You’re late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?’
“Absolutely not. That’s outrageous.”
“What then?”
“The PO Box is in Virginia.”
SOURCES:
[1] https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
See more here: nomorefakenews.com
Header image: Getty Images
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Ken Hughes
| #
Surely he meant ,…..December 10 2019, (Not 2020) ?
Reply
Ken Hughes
| #
But I thought that a medical diagnosis of Covid 19 must include both a positive PCR AND a clinical diagnosis from symptoms?
So, how can they say any diagnosis is unconfirmed? Is it a positive PCR with no symptoms, or a negative PCR with symptoms, or both?
Reply
Allan Shelton
| #
Send this article to Rand Paul.
Reply
aaron
| #
rand paul is controlled opposition, part of the system of political theater
key word is theater, or a show
do not trust politicians of any flavor
Reply
Alan
| #
The report calculated the efficacy of the vaccine based on 170 cases of PCR confirmed infection, page 32 of the report, but the important issue is surely that this efficacy was determined 7 days after the second dose of the vaccine was given. This is a classic example of how results are distorted by manufacturer trials. As soon as they get a result that is favourable, they use it. I have read, but not seen explained, that it is often the case that the early results of trials are often favourable, but the longer-term results are less so. The calculation of a 95% efficacy was a relative risk because they only considered the 170 people who were infected, effectively ignoring the majority of the 43,278 on the trial who were not infected. This is does not justify mass vaccination of an entire population because the risk of infection is low.
The question that should be asked is why the 3410 suspected cases in the study group were ignored and not investigated, especially since they reveal that the vaccinated group was not much different to the placebo group.
Coverup is mild. It is a fraud.
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
Indeed, FDA and its expert advisory committee did not do an honest and professional assessment of the vaccine, as I described in my article (PSI published on Dec 19, 2020) titled “FDA’s ‘False, Unscientific & Deceitful’ Review Of Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine”. (https://principia-scientific.com/fdas-false-unscientific-deceitful-review-of-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine/)
Further, in reality, it is not possible to develop a vaccine (of any other treatment) without the availability of a scientifically validated test. The development of the vaccine based on a non-validated PCR test remains a fraud (https://principia-scientific.com/covid-19-vaccine-not-possible-for-a-virus-not-yet-identified/). PSI published the article on Aug 16, 2020.
Reply
Jeffrey
| #
How do you account for Israel – the most fully vaccinated country in the world? Covid is down to nothing. The country has opened up completely even to foreign tourists.
There is something more to it than the vaccine does not work.
What is at play here?
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Jeffrey,
Covid is down to nothing where ever the flu season is over. The reason being the cycles being used for the phony PCR test was changed from 30 to 40 to give a positive result down to less tan 20 to give a negative result to try to make it look like the deadly vaccine was working. It will be interesting to see what happens next flu season and the difference between those vaccinated and those not.
Herb
Reply
Cris
| #
Hi Herb
I hope we do get flu back even though i get it sometimes but I’m sick of all the effects of this “fear of dying of a deadly virus” in my commuter life- it’s like the circus, on so many levels.
Reply
Tom
| #
What? Pharma and the FDA colluding to allow drugs on the market that have not been properly tested or that whose negative results are ignored by the pharma owned FDA…stunning, well almost. This has become standard operating procedure over the last 30 years. This is especially true with new cancer drugs. This fake vaccine fiasco is only the latest episode in a demonstrably horrid career of big pharma and the FDA pushing drugs for profits while ignoring safety and efficacy. Their complicit corruption knows no bounds even as 100’s of millions of lives are at stake.
Reply
Andrew Pilkington
| #
Easy answer: Just don’t do any “Tests” and turn off the TV. No more Covid? 🙂
Actually, in the UK and the USA, ALL PCR AND LFT “tests” MUST BE STOPPED “IMMEDIATELY”, but not just because PCR is NOT a “Test”, or that they are using the Massive percentages of FALSE POSITIVES to Terrify and Control the General Public. But because 4/4 Nasopharyngeal PCR “AND” LFT Swabs at least, are now CONFIRMED as being Contaminated with the Deadly Carcinogen “Ethylene-Oxide”, which is renowned for Causing “Brain Cancer”, amongst others.
“Yep”, “Nasal” Swabs. You got it!
These Swabs are implanting Brain Cancer in us, right where the access to the Brain is easiest.
JUST READ THE INFORMATION ON A SWAB WRAPPER … “Sterilised by Ethylene-Oxide Gas”, “EO”. Some wrappers may just show “EO” in a small box?
AND…
A recent PCR Swab Analysis was conducted in the Slovak-Repuplic, which you should be able to find quite easily? It’s a PDF file. This Analysis PROVES beyond doubt that the PCR Swabs they tested, were Contaminated with DARPA Hydrogel also – The NanoWorms and NanoBots found in Face Masks ring a bell?
With regard to a video Analysis conducted here in Britain, the LFT Swab tested, was also Sterilised by “Ethylene Oxide”, but it was PROVEN that the Small Contaminated Fibres break off when inside our Nasal Cavity, where the heat and moisture causes the Ethylen-Oxide to turn to Anti-Freeze, as I understand it, although I am Not, a Chemist.
We’ve seen how these Nano particles (” NanoWorms”) react when warm, moist air is breathed upon them, from the random Mask tests, so I guess these on the Swabs react the same?
Ref:
1) Former Police Constable, “Mark Sexton” who can best be found on Facebook (UK).
2) Slovak-Republic Swab Analysis.
3) Former Nurse and Medical Investigator, “Cassandra S. Dunn” (US).
I have uploaded a “Compilation” video to my “Roo63” accounts on Odysee, BitChute and Brand New Tube. It’s entitled “”NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT” – … “. I forget the rest of the title, but it’s my latest upload anyway and I apologise, but I cannot provide links on this little Tablet 🙂
If you can’t be bothered watching my video? All the separate links are in the description below the video/s anyway. It’s maybe better to watch mine if you have no Facebook access, though 🙂
I have also shared this information on the Facebook group page “Worldwide Awakening” and this whole subject of Swab Contamination, is Marked as an “Announcement” on there, also. Should you be passing by, please consider becoming a member, if you follow the content shared on there, but that’s not compulsory 🙂
Just STOP / REFUSE the “Tests”. That’s all I want because, nevermind Us, they are Murdering our Kids too ffs, and the Kids have far less of a clue what Danger they are in, when they Consent, than Adults do? Maybe on Par, actually?
PLEASE JUST READ THE BLOODY WRAPPER / LABEL. “Ethylene-Oxide” “EO”.
Thank you, and good article. Much appreciated.
Reply