The False Laws Of Physics
In order to find something false it must contradict something that is believed more strongly to be true. This means there must be something we believe to be true, solely on the basis of faith
We cannot rely solely on our senses since we experience many examples of the things we sense being false.
Everyone sees that the Earth is the center of the universe and all the stars in the sky rotate around it.
Just because five of those stars don’t follow the normal pattern does not mean they are not rotating around the Earth.
It is our belief that things behave in orderly patterns that overcame the evidence and convinced us that the heliocentric solar system was the reality. It is a balance between reason and evidence that causes us to accept something as real.
“Energy and matter cannot be created or destroyed” is a statement of faith. It is the basic truth physics has accepted in order to test other beliefs.
The problem for physics is that reasoning is a function of individuals and for many the one inviolable truth is that what they believe can never be wrong.
According to current theory a white dwarf star radiates energy resulting from the electrons and protons of atoms combining to form neutrons. When a neutron is not within the nucleus of an atom it will quickly convert into a proton, an electron, and energy in the form of gamma radiation.
This is the creation of energy so either the white dwarf star theory is wrong, the evidence from the decay of a neutron is wrong, or the foundation of physics is wrong.
The same is true for the theories for nuclear energy. When a nucleus decays there is a release of energy but when a larger nucleus is formed by the fusion of two nuclei there is, again, a release of energy, fission and fusion.
It is not possible to split a alpha particle into two deuterium ions releasing energy and then combine two deuterium ions creating an alpha particle and release more energy. One of the theories is wrong or all of physics is wrong.
“All matter absorbs radiated energy and all matter above absolute zero, radiate energy”. Law of Thermodynamics
The only way we can detect matter is if it radiates energy and the only way we can detect energy is when it interacts with matter. Again we have a statement of faith that reality is limited to our perception of it.
Physicist can invent new dimensions, dark matter, and dark energy to preserve the theories they’ve created but this is not reality but a fantasy to preserve their conceit of infallibility.
Kepler’s second law of orbiting objects states that the velocity squared of an orbiting object times the distance from the object it orbits has the same value for all objects orbiting that object: C=dV^2. This law seems to be true with the limited evidence we’ve seen.
“Every body perseveres in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by forces impressed.” Isaac Newton
In order to be observed an object must radiate energy and thus contain energy. Energy (v^2) creates motion and every visible object in the universe is in motion.
If an object were to move in a straight line, the distance between it and the source of radiated energy must change. This violates Kepler’s law. When an object travels in an orbit around another object the distance between the objects remains constant and the orbiting object remains in equilibrium with the energy radiated by the central object, unable either to gain or lose energy.
If it were to move in a straight line it would no longer be in equilibrium and would need to lose energy to or gain energy from the energy field. In a three dimensional universe there are no straight lines only arcs, as the energy of an object equalizes with whatever energy field it is in.
Objects do not equalize energy with other objects.
In the transfer of energy by radiation the distance between objects means the level of energy from one object reaching another object will always be lower than the energy level emitted by the object.
In the transfer of energy by convection the level of energy of the two objects can equalize but unless the objects have equal mass, the amount of energy does not equalize. An object with greater mass and velocity cannot cause an object with less mass to have a greater velocity than the object striking it.
The Law of Conservation of Momentum: M1V1 + M2V2 = M1V3 + M2V4 means that the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Heat only flows from hotter to cooler.) is wrong.
In elastic collisions objects do not transfer mass, only energy, so even when the greater mass of an object causes it to have more kinetic energy than the object striking it, if the striking object has greater velocity (energy) it will transfer energy to the object with more kinetic energy.
Energy flows to the mass or the nucleus of atoms so the correct law is energy flows from an object with greater energy per unit mass to an object with less energy per unit mass, regardless of the total energy of the objects.
A small car rear ending a large truck will slow down (lose energy) while the truck will increase in velocity (gain energy).
The energy being radiated by an object will decrease with increasing distance (Kepler’s Law) until it encounters the energy being radiated from another object that is of equal strength. The size of an object is determined by it radiated energy field, not its mass.
“Every body preserves in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by forces impressed.” Work equals mass times acceleration. F = ma. Newton’s 2nd Law of motion
Objects are composed of both energy and mass so when energy is added to them it not only goes to increase the velocity of the object but also to its internal structure, so the energy needed to accelerate an object is greater than the amount expressed as acceleration.
If enough energy is added to exceed the strength of the bonds holding the object together, it will disintegrate shedding energy as kinetic energy as well as radiated energy.
This is what happens when a meteor “burns” when entering the upper atmosphere. It is not because of rare oxygen atoms combining with the elements of the meteor but because it has gone from the stronger energy field of the sun into the weaker Earth energy field and equalizes by shedding matter.
Work is the changing of the energy of an object. There is no work needed to keep an object in orbit. If you add energy to a satellite it will no longer be in equilibrium and radiate more energy into the energy field it is in, resulting in the satellite losing velocity and having less energy than it had before the energy was added.
If you remove energy from a satellite (slow it) it will gain energy from the energy field it is in, resulting in it having more energy (greater velocity) than before the energy was removed.
Mass is different than weight. Weight is the mass of an object times the force of gravity. If the inertial mass of objects is equal to the gravitational mass of object then gravity can never cause objects to move.
Mass is how strongly an object is held by an energy field and as energy changes so does mass.
A race car needs to have an aerodynamic design that forces the car down, maintaining traction, as the speed of the car increases and mass is converted to momentum. If a spoiler on the race car detaches, the car can become airborne even though the change in mass is negligible.
The force of gravity on a satellite doesn’t change significantly from when it is on the ground atop a rocket or orbiting the Earth. It is “weightless” because almost all of its mass has become forward momentum.
As things begin to move the energy needed to keep them moving or increase their speed decreases.
“To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction; or, the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal and directed to contrary parts.” Newton’s 3rd Law of motion
It is energy that causes motion not matter which creates inertia and it is the fields radiated by objects that are interacting, not their masses. The sun is not cooling because the Earth is absorbing some of the energy it radiates.
g = GM1M2/d^2 Newton’s Law of Gravity
Newton failed to realize that energy (v^2) was a separate component of objects, different than matter, even though Galileo’s experiments had shown the rate an object falls is independent of its mass and Kepler’s law had shown the orbiting of objects was independent of their mass.
He needed a source for his force and chose mass.
Newton claimed the distance between objects were from the center of one object to the center of the other object, even though the forces being radiated by objects are from its surface and decrease with increasing distance from the surface.
The point of the Earth that orbits the sun is not the center of the Earth but the barycenter which is the center of the masses of the Earth and moon.
The energy field radiated by the Earth and other planets encompasses their moons making them into one unit, which orbits the sun. This is why when there is an eclipse of the full moon when it passes into the Earth’s shadow the light coming from the sun is blocked but there is no change in the force of gravity between the sun and moon.
If Newton’s formula for gravity is used the strength of gravity between the sun and moon is sixty percent greater than the force of gravity between the Earth and the moon> So why is the moon still orbiting the Earth?
Newton’s Law of gravity does not explain the elliptical orbits of satellites. This is because the attractive force between objects is not a function of their mass but the energy they radiate.
At the apogee of an orbit, where the distance is greatest, a satellite will begin to move closer to the object it orbits and its velocity will increase. At the perigee the satellite will begin to move further away from the center object and is velocity will begin to decrease.
This is the exact opposite of what Newton’s theory predicts.
“The orbit of a planet around the sun is an ellipse, with the sun at one of the two foci.” Kepler’s first law of orbiting objects
The sun is the only focal point of the orbiting planets and their satellites, just as the planets are the only focal point for their orbiting satellites. With only one focal point the elliptical path of a satellite would be a circle and the satellite’s velocity would be constant.
The non circular elliptical orbits of satellites is not due to there being two focal points but because objects are radiating two forces with different strengths and different actions.
The energy of an object radiates an attractive force while the matter of the object radiate a repelling force, with the attractive force being the stronger force by a factor of psi (1.61…) and the force of matter and the force of energy have opposite actions. It is energy that causes matter to radiate electrical forces of different strengths.
Energy is attracted to mass, specifically the positive charge of protons and because it is stronger than the electric force of matter it is able to separate electrons from protons causing them to form orbits around the protons.
Even though an atom contains equal number of protons and electrons, making it neutral, it will radiate a stronger negative field than its positive electric field thus creating a repelling force between objects.
Both the attractive forces of energy (gravity as a general attractive force and magnetism as a directional attractive force) and the electric force of matter are subatomic forces. The attraction of energy to protons is what causes the formation of the nucleus of an atom.
As long as the surface of a nucleus is composed entirely of protons, the atom will be stable.
This attractive force is radiated from the nucleus in all directions as gravity. The negative charge of the orbiting electrons blocks the flow of this radiated energy force creating both a directional magnetic force and the spectrum emitted by atoms.
There are no strong or weak nuclear forces just the compression force of energy on the surface of the nucleus and the electric force of electrons within the nucleus.
This action of energy in forming the nucleus is shown by the results of the destruction of nuclei in radioactive decay.
A neutron emitted from a nucleus will decay quickly into a proton, an electron, and gamma radiation because of the action of energy on the exposed electron (converting a neutron molecule to a hydrogen atom), while an alpha particle, with its internal repelling force, will remain stable due to its electrons being surrounded by protons in a tetrahedral shape.
After the lpha particle losses energy it gains electrons becoming a helium atom.
In beta decay, where an electron is expelled from the nucleus, energy is expended to overcome the attractive electric force between the atom’sprotons and the electron and the internal repelling force of like charges increases with the addition of another proton, yet the resulting nucleus is stable because the added positive charge of the proton increases the strength of the energy force holding the nucleus together.
The sun “”burns” because energy is converting neutron molecules into hydrogen atoms, fission. Hydrogen and helium are the ashes of the solar reaction mot the fuel of fusion.
When enough larger stable atoms are created, that can’t be expelled from the sun’s surface by to solar winds, a sun will shed these larger ashes as a nova and they will then coalesce into planets, moons, and asteroids. The trash piles of the sun.
The electric force of matter and the gravity/magnetic force of energy act in similar ways but with opposite results.
When the distance between opposite poles of magnets decreases, the radiated magnetic field and strength of the radiated attractive force increases, as internal energy becomes radiated energy.
As the distance between similar magnetic poles decreases, the strength and size of the radiated magnetic force of the magnets also decreases. There is an increase in the internal repelling force between the magnets and a decrease of radiated force by the magnets.
With the electric force as the distance between opposite charges decrease the size and strength of the radiated electric fields decrease becoming a stronger internal force, eventually creating a neutron molecule.
When similar charges are forced together the size and strength of the radiated electric field increases as internal force becomes radiated force.
When energy is added to an object it increases the attractive force between it and its neighbors cause the distance between them to decrease, This increase in the energy around the nuclei force the electrons away from the nuclei increasing the repelling force between the atoms.
It is this oscillation of atoms field that create electromagnetic waves in the fields radiated by objects.
It is also the reason why object orbit in elliptical orbits. At the apogee the attractive force of energy becomes the stronger force while at the perigee the repelling force of matter become the stronger force.
The laws of physics remain the same regardless of perceived size and all is a result of the two forces of matter and energy. E does not equal mc^2.
Light is a disturbance in the fields radiated by objects, a transmission of energy. The matter and energy fields of objects decrease with increasing distance form the source. The speed of light can never be constant but decreases as it passes through decreasing fields and increases in as the radiated fields’ strength increases (gets closer to the source of the fields).
This is what cause the red and blue shift of the spectral lines of light emitted by atoms. The blurring of these lines are not caused by any motion of the source but by the light traveling through multiple decreasing and increasing radiated fields.
All of Einstein’s theories are wrong. The photoelectric effect is the same as the piezoelectric effect where the distortion of an ionic bond in a crystal or metal causes an electron, already separated from an atom, to create a current. There is no such thing as a photon.
Planck’s law: The energy of a wave is equal to the frequency times Planck’s constant.
No, the energy of a wave is a result of its amplitude. A tsunami contains a lot of energy but has low frequency.
Planck was trying to resolve the problem presented by ultraviolet light to the Black Body theory and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Black bodies do not exist in reality and the Second Law of Thermodynamics is wrong.
The Law of Entropy says that all things tend to disorder. BS. All things move as the flow of energy directs them.
An electric current will take a path perpendicular to a magnetic field. This produces a two dimensional plane. When a changing current passes through a magnetic field it will produce motion perpendicular to both the current and magnetic field, creating a three dimensional object.
There is a third force involved in the formation of the universe.
Both the electric and energy forces decrease with distance (Kepler’s Law) but their strengths decline as the square of the distance, an area.
Wisnox showed that at an angle of approximately thirty seven degrees between the force of matter (1) and the force of energy, psi (1.61…) that the length of the line where the strength of the forces are equal is pi (3.141…).
The third force forming the universe is pi and it acts on the force of energy creating a three dimensional universe with one dimension (radius) which is the vector of the energy force.
The directional magnetic energy force radiates north and south from an object. The constant force of pi causes this force to turn, converting a radiated force, going away from the object, into an attractive force going towards the object.
The same happens with the non directional force of gravity.
In turn the action of the energy force on the matter force causes matter to concentrate in a horizontal plane where the strength of the north and south flows are equal. This creates the orderly uniform shapes of the atom, solar systems, and galaxies, not a group of objects moving in random directions.
The force of pi causes the radiation of energy from an object to move in arcs. When the radiated energy encounters an energy field of equal strength emitted from another source its flow is blocked.
Disturbances (light ) will be transmitted to the other field and as the strength of the new field increases the speed of the disturbance will increase. Energy not encountering another object’s radiated energy field will return to its source.
Objects only lose energy when that energy is absorbed by the matter of another object and becomes part of its energy field. Light entering another object’s fields, but not striking the source matter, will continue to travel through the universe, causing its spectral lines to blur until it is absorbed by matter.
We cannot trust the evidence we see through a telescope to give us a true picture of reality.
Please note: PSI does not necessarily endorse the views of each and every article we publish. Our intention is to encourage open, honest, scientific debate.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Readers,
Herb wrote ““Energy and matter cannot be created or destroyed” is a statement of faith. It is the basic truth physics has accepted in order to test other beliefs.”
I write ““Energy and matter cannot be created or destroyed” is a statement of OBSERVED FACTS; which is the foundation of the NATURAL physical sciences including CHEMISTRY.
Have a good day.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Sunmod,
I expect my previous comment will disappear for awhile. So will you please hasten its return. Thank you!
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
As an experimental chemist please explain to everybody how long you must observe no evidence in order to prove that something cannot occur under any circumstance?
Why must you take every opportunity to demonstrate how stupid you are?
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Herb,
“No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” Albert Einstein
I agree with Einstein and admit that what I claim to UNDERSTAND has not been proven to be the TRUTH.. However, when you ask “how long you must observe no evidence in order to prove that something cannot occur under any circumstance?’, my answer is until you propose and do a reproductive experiment which proves what I understand (BELIEVE) to be wrong. I will illustrate this process for another quote of Einstein is: “The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.” I pondered this quote; have you? From the first eye glasses and telescopes we observed that the phenomenon of REFRACTION bends LIGHT. And astronomers have long observed that the sunlight appears to rise over the eastern horizon before it should. And with this observation I accept that the earth’s atmosphere, with its density gradient which decreases with an increasing altitude, REFRACTS LIGHT.
However, Einstein CONTINUALLY stressed that adults should maintain a child like ATTITUDE. Hence he played a trick. He had seriously questioned if gravity could BEND LIGHT and he knew that a certain star’s light would pass relatively near the sun during a 1919 total solar eclipse and he predicted, on the basis of refraction, by the earth’s atmosphere at that tine, how much the earth’s atmosphere would refract the sun light. When this prediction was confirmed
he KNEW that gravity didn’t bend light but he also knew that all the BRILiLANT ASTRONOMERS had overlooked the known FACT that the earth’s atmosphere should also refract (bend) the star’s light. So only HE, and I, seem to know that gravity DOES NOT bend light.
Have a good day
Reply
Howdy
| #
“No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.”
Too vague to be of any value, other than as a supposed indicator of wisdom that isn’t.
Reply
Howdy
| #
Science gets a mention in this below, as well as scientists falling prey to falsity.
The expert is Prof Mattheus Desmet. Well worth watching IMO.
Reply
Howdy
| #
No response? I’ll explain my reasoning.
“No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right”
If 1) The original experiment was not conducted precisely, or if 2) An unknown anomaly was present, or if 3) The instructions to conduct the experiment for others contain an error, then the above quote is true.
“a single experiment can prove me wrong”
This second quote simply reaffirms the first, because if 1, 2, or 3 are correct, the second quote is also correct. Any error in translation from the first experiment to any other will result in a fail, thus proving the complete quote.
There are 3 reasons I’ve given, though many more exist, and the big problem is that the quote lacks context, which makes it invalid from a scientific point of view.
Reply
Howdy
| #
Actually, thinking about it again, it’s possible for any error in translation to render the second part of the quote invalid, if one recognizes that such error means the follow up experiment was not expressly the same as the original.
I realize this is not always possible though.
In the end, Einstein said question everything, and I have merely followed the master’s prompt.
Lloyd
| #
HUH?????? This was a long and rambling dissertation that SCREAMS for an editor. It seems to revolve around how words and conditions are interpreted. If the majority of Laws are fake in our existence, I guess this is a dream, the Matrix, Magic works, or some other such construct from a science fiction plot.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
Had I been asked to edit it rather than just copy & paste, it would have been significantly shorter.
Reply
Lloyd
| #
HUH?????? This was a long and rambling dissertation that SCREAMS for an editor. It seems to revolve around how words and conditions are interpreted. If the majority of Laws are fake in our existence, I guess this is a dream, the Matrix, Magic works, or some other such construct from a science fiction plot.
Reply
Seriously
| #
Finding an analogy to open closed minds can be cumbersome…the need to repeat oneself, in hopes of making the information AVAILable to different minds, is undeniably true. Presented in this manner or a different manner, makes he difference of whether the ‘lightbulb’ goes off in the mind or remains dim forever.
I ‘create’ energy every single day…by eating a steak, a banana etc…I then have ‘energy’ to perform tasks. No steak, less and less energy. Simple, observational chemistry of the needs of any body that self propels. Simplistic, yes. But it was the basis for me questioning ‘energy cannot be created or destroyed ‘ from the grade school level. Every living thing that dies destroys energy in the process of that death. The ‘remains’ revert to basic organic mass (by specialized insects, bacteria, et al) and ‘create’ energy (food) for the flora of this planet.
‘Enery cannot be created or destroyed’ – it’s a beautiful sentence, linguistally very attractive…. But is it TRUE?
It’s difficult for humans to hold in ther minds, at all times, that physics, if not observational, are theories…opinions if you will. Satellites, behaving in a specific, predictable manner, is observational physics.
Reply
Moffin
| #
Energy conversion is not energy creation.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Moffin,
“I ‘create’ energy every single day…by eating a steak, a banana etc…”. (Seriously). Good careful READING.
Have a good day
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Sunmod,
Yes, again. Really want Moffin know I promptly read his comment. Thank you.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Sunmod,
My last comment has appeared as a recent comment but it still does not appear as a comment to Herb’s article. This cannot be caused by my computer. It HAS TO BE PSI”s problem. Have a good day
Reply
Len Winokur
| #
No comment! (Bar the paradox that this is one.)
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Len,
The lack of comments on the subject of the article puzzles me. One would expect that disputing the basic laws of physics would rally support by the believers, yet silence, There are comments on how it is wordy and too long, on the belief in the conservation of energy and matter. and inane quotes from Jerry but nothing challenging the arguments, Surely someone out there can explain how an object in equilibrium with its source of radiated energy can move in a straight line and remain in equilibrium with that source or how Newton’s law of gravity doesn’t violate the evidence of an elliptical orbit.
The laws I question are the foundation of physics and people still believe that there are gas giants planets based on their masses being derived from Newton’s formula. Where are the defenders of the faith?
Herb
Reply
Seriously
| #
Perhaps the light bulb has collectively lit? 💡💥Usually there are quite a few proclaiming, repeating, ad nausem, the dogma you seek to upend…criticism of your ideas, downright name calling…
It’s a puzzle…🤔🤯
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Herb,
You ask “Where are the defenders of the faith?” My Websters defines faith as “that which is believed”. Henc FAITH is what ONE believes and there can be NO DEFENDERS of IT.
Have a good day
Reply
Howdy
| #
Faith includes hope, which belief does not, so the dictionary is wrong.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Sunmod,
Yes again. Have a good day
Reply