The Deception of Virology & Vaccines: Why CV-19 Is Not Contagious
This post intends to go to the heart of virology and vaccination itself and what vaccination is propped up by – the entirety of virology and vaccine science is predicated on one thing—that viruses are infectious agents that cause disease.
Without this theory, vaccines would not be ‘effective’ or ‘work’ in the minds of the people. Without the virus theory, vaccines would crumble like a house of cards.
This article will show the pseudoscience behind the theories that prop up virology and the vast problems with it.
Viruses Are Not Living Organisms
Firstly, viruses are not living organisms or living microbes. They do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.
Viruses are not alive and viruses are not contagious. The fear behind Coronavirus, for instance, is wholly unwarranted.
Forget everything you think you know about viruses and bacteria. You have been lied to. The science of virology is based upon the study of viruses. However, no real footage of viral activity exists (except for a recently released (2018) short footage of an HIV virus which shows merely 20 percent of the virus theory process).
Such footage is merely 3D animation and models.
Scientific Encyclopedia states viruses have been obtained for experimentation by means of extremely powerful centrifuges which must be specially built. Viruses are so small that they average around 0.1 microns in size for a typical virus.
Observation Of Viruses Is Inherently Flawed
Viruses are observed in cell cultures/petri-dish environments. Cell cultures are grown in controlled conditions outside their natural environment, wherein cells are artificially kept alive by fluids that are toxic and do damage to cellular activity.
In such a sterile environment, cells cannot utilize the full range of their normal cleansing methods as they would in the human body.
Those processes are:
- Phagocytosis (and all of its processes)
- Bacterial
- Fungal
- Parasitical
- Viral (virus)
In the processes of phagocytosis, cellular debris and dead and dying tissue are absorbed and discarded for elimination out of the body.
It is bacteria that first and foremost carry out this process in large part—mainly as scavengers. Fungus and parasites are called upon as needed in special cases, and in this process, small amounts of viruses may be utilized to accompany all other processes.
All of these processes are alive, but viruses are not alive.
In such an artificial environment wherein cells are kept alive but not healthy by serums, cells will degenerate, and their viral janitors will become prominent.
Viruses do not multiply on their own. When added to fertile petri-dishes that sustain cellular life, no additional viral protein structures appear.
Only when cells are added is there multiplication of viral protein structures. However, this is because petri-dishes are not the proper or healthy environment for cells, and so viral waste occurs.
This is because cells must manufacture viruses to cleanse themselves in such a toxic environment since they do not have access to the full range of their cleansing processes as would occur in the body.
I will show why—
Note: Viruses are necessary to dissolve dead and dying tissue when tissue is so toxic that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those tissues, waste, and cellular debris without being poisoned to death.
When Would Viral Activity Become Prominent?
As stated, viruses may accompany these processes in small amounts. However, viruses will only become prominent when all these other processes have been largely killed due to:
- Environmental toxicity
- Pollution
- Chemical inundation
- Poor air quality
- Poor water quality
- Poor food quality
- Nutritional deficiencies
- Wrong combination or choice of foods
- Medical treatment, such as antibiotics and medications
When a body has a high degree of toxicity, bacteria feeding upon that toxic dead matter and tissue will be poisoned to death.
When the body is at such a point of systemic toxicity, where bacterial levels and all living microbes in the body have been diminished or killed due to the above reasons, the body will call upon the help of viruses to help cleanse itself.
When the body cannot utilize milder methods, such as a cold (usually bacterial), it will utilize the help of non-living protein solvents which are known as viruses.
I will show why this is the only logical answer. Viruses help consume and eliminate substances into small particles that can then be expelled via mucous membranes, out through the skin, or through the intestinal tract.
Cells produce viruses when their tissues are so toxic that phagocytes, parasites, bacteria, and fungi cannot help cleanse, repair and regenerate their tissues and fluids.
Science states, incorrectly without proof, that viruses originate outside the body, then ‘hijack’ the RNA or DNA of the cell, and then replicate whilst attacking cells indiscriminately.
If this were true, viruses would replicate endlessly, eventually attacking all healthy cells, but they do not. We know that antibodies, a type of white blood cell, regulates the virus.
There exists no video evidence of viruses hijacking cells, except for 3D renders, and animations based on theory.
The True Creation of Viruses (simplistic view)
Science falsely claims that viruses replicate themselves. In reality, it is the cell itself that is producing the virus.
Notice how viruses are manufactured by a healthy cell but do not destroy it. RNA and/or DNA is given by the host cell to dissolve specific substances inside the body. If this were not the case, the virus would destroy the cell which created it, but it does not.
The virus is ejected, damaging part of the cell, but not destroying it completely. The cell is then able to repair itself in time. Cells conspire as one unit to cleanse themselves and their surroundings so that new cellular activity can thrive.
Large amounts of viral activity are present when the body is unable to use milder living microbial detoxification methods to cleanse itself due to systemic toxicity of tissues that poison living microbes.
Steps for Creation of a Virus
- Viral proteins part of the genome of the living body existing in every cell which determines what type of proteins will be created by a cell is called into action.
- Viral proteins existing in the cell enter the nucleus of the cell. Viruses are manufactured in their whole form within the cell, and sequenced/encoded via RNA/DNA host directives.
- The virus leaves the nucleus and is housed in the cell until it leaves the cell.
- The virus is ejected by the cell, damaging a part of the cell, but not destroying it.
- Viruses change every 72 hours.
Virus replication continues and every 72 hours the first strain is exhausted and an entirely new set of viruses is then manufactured by cells to continue the job of the previous, until the process is complete.
How Viruses are Manufactured | The True Processes of the Virus
Viruses do not infect healthy stable cells. They dissolve dead and decaying cells and tissue, dissolving them so that new cellular activity can thrive.
A good analogy:
Flies appear on dead matter but are not the cause of the dead matter. They are scavengers that break down dead matter. In this way, viruses and bacteria operate in the same exact manner within the body.
Without scavengers on Earth to clean up waste, Earth’s air would become toxic. The same processes are carried out in the body on a microscopic macro level.
Science states the opposite of what reality dictates to us through our own observation of nature. This is impossible because our bodies are microcosms for the way nature operates outside our bodies. Assuming the opposite of this goes against our observable nature and is foolish.
As stated, when the normal janitorial functions of the body have been largely diminished and killed due to systemic toxicity, cells can no longer maintain themselves. Red blood cells come together as a whole unit to save themselves and conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing solvent protein constructs (virus) that disassemble and break down dead and dying cells, cellular waste,
tissue, and foreign debris.
Cells manufacture viruses in their whole form cellularly. In this process, viruses are manufactured directly within the cell using pre-existing viral protein in the cell and genome, and are embedded/encoded with RNA and/or DNA by the host cell.
The cell ejects the virus, which is then regulated by white blood cells through that encoding (antibodies), which oversee the processes of the virus. This allows the viral activity to be controlled and regulated properly.
These two functions are united as one process, and they do not act separately. Once the cell ejects this virus, the cell is partially damaged but is not destroyed. The viruses, which are many, consume and dissolve dead, dying and foreign tissue, debris, unhealthy cells, and cellular waste.
This process takes time depending on the toxicity involved. The effects of their elimination are the symptoms experienced in cold or flu. Viruses break these substances down into tiny particles that can then be expelled via mucous, skin, and bowels.
When the process is complete, the body becomes stronger, so long as that person does not continue to toxify his or her body further. If he or she does, such extreme detoxifications will always occur.
Viral Facts
Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.
Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.
Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.
Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.
Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place.
Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.
Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.
Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.
There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.
Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.
Viruses are very specific protein structures.
Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses.
Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles.
Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.
Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.
Viruses are cyclical in animals.
Viruses feed upon waste products in the blood and tissue.
The only way to get a virus outside of natural means is via direct injection (vaccine) or blood transfusions of a patient who has a virus. However, in such cases, the body only analyzes it as foreign tissue that must be eliminated.
Since the virus did not originate within the bodily host, that body does not know the time and place that the virus will be active nor does it have the key to decode it (RNA or DNA encoded by the cell) and cannot find the time of its activity.
As such, it is analyzed as a foreign substance that must be eliminated. Protein solvents (viruses) are manufactured of varying strengths to discard this waste if living microbes cannot eliminate it.
Throughout the year, upon season and climatic/temperature changes, the body will dump mass amounts of toxins into the blood for removal. Some of these toxins are so toxic in nature, such as mercury, formaldehyde, and other chemical byproducts, that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate them without dying.
Non-living proteins are then manufactured by each cell in the corresponding location of the body where this cleansing is necessary. Those toxic substances are disassembled and broken down by viruses so that the body can eliminate them, restoring homeostasis.
The only way viruses can be used as biological weapons is via injection, period. It is possible that such manmade viral strains are included in regular existing vaccines, and this should not be ruled out as a possibility, but as previously stated, viral strains from outside the body are not recognized.
However, man-made substances that are injected can be designed to provoke extreme reactions in humans via various levels of tissue sterilization and adjuvants.
Viruses cannot cross-species ie; from animal to mankind. It is impossible for humans to develop animal flus—
A. Because viruses are not contagious, and,
B. Because animal RNA/DNA is not compatible with human RNA/DNA.
The only way animal tissue can be observed in the blood is through injection of animal tissues, which make their way to the blood, bypassing the digestive tract.
Only then will swine tissue, or bird tissue, or any such animal tissue appear in the body.
When animal meat is consumed by a human, it is converted into human tissue.
Human cells cannot produce animal cells or viruses. If we develop viruses, they are human viruses. Even if animal viruses ‘hijacked’ human cells, human cells cannot possibly produce animal viruses
Coronavirus is a respiratory virus manufactured by cells in the lungs and respiratory areas to cleanse themselves of systemic toxicity.
Such a cold virus occurs and functions in the following way: Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and respiratory system>Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli) where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature>Specific non- living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs>Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiates the cleansing and healing process.
Coughing brings blood and nutrients to the respiratory system. The symptoms associated with their removal are what occurs during SARS. Such airborne toxic substances are caused by burning plastics, formaldehyde, and factory tainted air, which encompasses a wide array of very toxic byproducts.
Older individuals with already weakened immune systems are prone to more advanced respiratory virus detoxifications and will account for most deaths.
This illness may crop up in millions due to dense populations like in China breathing in such air on a daily basis. This does not mean it is contagious—it’s not.
The 4 Main Steps For Coronavirus Creation
- Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and
respiratory system. - Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli), where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature.
- Specific non-living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs.
- Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiate the cleansing and healing process.
Why Viruses Arise In The Body
As previously stated, the processes of phagocytosis, fungal, parasitical, and bacterial, which are all living microbes, are responsible for consuming and eliminating dead cells, cellular waste, and foreign debris.
But when tissue is so toxic that those living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those substances without being poisoned to death, cells will conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing specific non-living solvents know as viruses, which break down and disassemble those substances into particles to be expelled out through the skin, mucus, and bowels.
Viruses leave the cell, damaging only a part of the cell, but not destroying it. Once out of the cell, they are regulated by white blood cell antibodies to dissolve specific tissues and debris necessary to restore relative homeostasis.
Viruses do not destroy the cell wherein they are replicated, yet science states they infect other cells and DO destroy other cells indiscriminately, which has no proof and makes no logical sense. Such a theory is obviously untrue because then viruses would attack every living cell without a cause, killing the body every time, but this does not happen. Viruses only dissolve dead and dying waste in almost all circumstances.
The only time a virus would appear to attack living tissue is when metals are embedded in the tissue, such as polio cases, where viruses have to get into spinal column areas and cleanse tissue. Since metal is hard to remove from the body, it is natural for viruses to break down living tissue to remove those metals, which gives the illusion that the virus is somehow working against the body. In reality, the virus is attempting to heal the systemic toxicity of the body and reverse it.
Conclusion
There is no other explanation for how the human body maintains itself. It is the only logical answer. The truth has been hidden by science for almost 200 years, yet was revealed long ago in the 1800s by scientists such as Antoine Béchamp, who documented in his own experiments that viruses are terrain dependent, non-living agents that break down waste matter, that they come from within,not from without.
Viruses are nothing more than proteins that cleanse. The same is true about cancer. Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself, by cocooning dead cells in a tumor in which the body is incapable of removing properly so that it can dissolve and cleanse those cells from the body at a later time.
The body is miraculous and finds ways to heal no matter the circumstances. It has ways of
short-circuiting and short-cutting pathways in times of trouble. It is sad that modern science has led so many astray in their thinking with regard to their own bodies and how it functions creating nothing but fear and panic, whilst reaping massive amounts of money for those in power as a result.
Such fear places a distrust in our own bodies, our neighbors and nature itself, making it appear as if we are powerless in the face of disease; that it is beyond our control and only the medical establishment can save us from ourselves.
How might those in power benefit from such chaos? Explore that thought. This confusion has led to the coronavirus ‘outbreak’ and the resulting fear and chaos which surrounds this manufactured and blown out of proportion event.
This virus is obviously being used to institute police state style laws and measures around the world and these will only increase if the majority do not wake up to the lies surrounding the nature of viruses and disease.
References
The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination, 1956, by Eleanor McBean M.D., N.D. (shows the many dangers of vaccinations, manipulated statistics throughout history, how polio arose, and the nature of virus and disease.)
Béchamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by E. Douglas Hume, 1923
The Blood and Its Third Element by Antoine Béchamp, 1912
Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, 1942 (discusses Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses.)
The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur, R.B. Pearson, 1942 (First published in 1942 under the title ‘Pasteur Plagiarist Imposter!-the Germ Theory Exploded’. Shows that Louis Pasteur plagiarized and distorted the work of professor Antoine Béchamp. The author propounds the viewpoint that bacteria in the body are a result, not a cause of disease, that vaccinations are harmful or at best,
ineffective and that Pasteur did not realize the consequences of the vaccines he and his followers created.)
More from Jeff G: Viral Misconceptions – Presentation on The True Nature of Viruses
https://youtu.be/MtWYQS3LFlE
See also:
virusesarenotcontagious.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
John Nicol
| #
This one of the most ridiculous articles I have ever read and really has no place on a forum such as this – John O’Sullivan pleae take not. No wonder the author would not show her/his face!!!.
Reply
Don Farley
| #
i agree with John Nichol. This virus is sweeping through our Canadian old age residences and confined living spaces, becoming more ferocious as it moves from one victim to another. To suggest that it is not contagious, is ridiculous. In an earlier PSI article, Dr Luc Montagnier, the discoverer of the HIV virus in 1983, is quoted as stating , under current dispute, that the COViD-19 virus has been laboratory modified and will be less prevalent with time like the 2005 SARS virus.
Reply
Squidly
| #
Oh, puleeeeez .. you sound like CNN …
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Directly below an anti-vaxxer article that states,
“Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself…”
is a request that asks, “Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.”
Principia wtf-ia you have got to be joking, surely.
Reply
Scouse Billy
| #
It is indeed a contentious statement but can you explain what cancer is?
Why do some people develop tumours but others don’t?
Indeed why do some people contract “infectious diseases”, while others don’t?
This is what this qualified medical doctor and Professor of chemistry said:
“Germs seek their natural habitat – diseased tissue – rather than being the cause of diseased tissue.” – Antoine Béchamp.
Of course, he wasn’t the first to allude to the importance of the “terrain”:
“It is more important to know what sort of person has a disease than to know what sort of disease a person has.” – Hippocrates
In the interest of scientific inquiry, perhaps you could spare a moment to explain how these eminent thinkers and logic are wrong.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Falsifiability is the assertion that for any hypothesis to have credence, it must be inherently disprovable before it can become accepted as a scientific hypothesis or theory.
Is the hypothesis that “The truth has been hidden by science for almost 200 years” falsifiable?
Try this:
1. Create an environment where no viral (eg: flu) infection can occur according to the “terrain” constraints of Antoine Béchamp. If there’s a qualified medical doctor / chemist who believes as you do who is still alive, you may ask for their advice instead. Century old medicine and chemistry is not as reliable nor useful.
2. Live there for a week or two so that your body reaches homeostasis and the environment is verified as “clean” and you can remain healthy.
3. Have someone with the flu visit, and kiss them deeply and long enough that these alleged “lying scientists / scientific theories” would be satisfied that viral transmission had occurred. Flu is good but given you and your ilk’s confidence in this, I’d welcome ebola or similar and the appropriate “lying scientists” chosen method of transmission.
4. Infected person leaves and your routine in the “clean terrain / environment” continues for as long as the alleged “lying scientist / science” says the incubation for the chosen virus lasts.
5. Measure viral load in the anti-virus believer, or observe symptoms if “lying scientist / science” viral load measuring data is consider also a lie. Hopefully being incredibly ill or dying will provide sufficient evidence of viral load.
6. Repeat this with 1000 randomly chosen anti-virus believers for a good sample size representative of the population of anti-virus believers.
7. (Optional) allow an alleged “lying scientist / doctor” to apply the alleged “lying science” remedy to the chosen viral infection and after the expected cure time, measure viral load or health indicators for recovery.
This is a loose description of a method for providing falisfiability test for the hypothesis you have presented and this article claims to be self evident and true.
Get back to me with your results.
Reply
Dev
| #
You have not understood what is being referred to when Antoine Béchamp speaks of terrain.
From that I can only conclude that you have not made the slightest effort to find out for yourself what he was referring to and thus reveal your open minded attitude clearly to all.
Many thanks
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Incorrect.
The terrain theory is the theory of disease proposed by Antoine Béchamp that a diseased body, the “terrain”, will attract germs to come as scavengers of the weakened or poorly defended tissue.
Specifically (from the article) create an environment where it is not possible for the human body to experience “when tissue is so toxic [snip] cells will conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing specific non-living solvents know as viruses.”
ie remove all toxins, things that would make tissue become toxic, etc, from an environment that precludes any “germs” needing to come as scavengers, and ensure the “terrain” (ie the person) is completely healthy and undiseased and there is no pre-existing viral activity.
Or, to put it succinctly, “Create an environment where no viral infection can occur according to the “terrain” constraints of Antoine Béchamp.”
Then introduce virus directly into the presently healthy and undiseased terrain (the person), returning them to an environment that has no way of causing cell toxicity that would lead to the “terrain” “manufacturing specific non-living solvents know as viruses.”
And see what happens.
Scouse Billy
| #
Thank you for replying, however:
You didn’t answer my questions and yet seek to inverse the obligation to disprove the null hypothesis.
There is a reason why after more than 100 years the germ theory remains just that, a theory never proven.
You seem sceptical that there could possibly be a doctor alive today that recognises the importance of the “terrain” per the Bechamp quotation above.
Do you not hear the many doctors and others exhorting us all to protect the vulnerable? Obviously the terrain is a critical factor. It always has been – why would you assume modern medicine/science are more reliable given the corruption evidenced by Ben Goldacre’s “Bad Pharma” or Climate Science” or `
Anyhow if you are actually interested here is an excellent exposition of the hard line “the terrain is all” position by Dr Thomas Cowan
https://youtu.be/ol4bcVse57c?t=2047
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Let’s just say no, I am not interested in anti-vaxxers and their beliefs. It’s nothing personal.
I am also not interested in someone’s belief that they are the reincarnation of John the Baptist, nor someone else’s belief that the earth is flat.
To quote someone better versed in science than me:
It is like saying “the debate is over” except that we have strong theoretical and empirical reason for stopping being interested in such potential explanations. People may keep on talking about everything but science isn’t an unrestricted babbling. Science eliminates ideas that disagree with known experiments or observations.
I am sceptical of the article, which cites Bechamp, and goes on to say viruses are “non-living solvents created in the body”. But you know, feel free to ignore the article entirely, coz, like, one line quotes n stuff.
Scouse Billy
| #
Thank you for replying, however:
You didn’t answer my questions and yet seek to inverse the obligation to disprove the null hypothesis.
That germs cause disease is the hypothesis to say they don’t is the null hypothesis.
There is a reason why after more than 100 years the germ theory remains just that, a theory – never proven. Many have tried, e.g. 1918 injecting mucous from “flu” patients into healthy subjects – they couldn’t do it.
If you can cite one proof of the germ theory, I’d like to see it.
You seem sceptical that there could possibly be a doctor alive today that recognises the importance of the “terrain” per the Bechamp quotation above.
Do you not hear the many doctors and others exhorting us all to protect the vulnerable? Obviously the terrain is a critical factor. It always has been – incidentally, why would you assume modern medicine/science are more reliable given the corruption evidenced by Ben Goldacre’s “Bad Pharma” or IPCC Climate “Science” etc.?
Anyhow, if you are actually interested, here is an excellent exposition of the hard line “the terrain is all” position by Dr Thomas Cowan:
https://youtu.be/ol4bcVse57c?t=2047
For anybody else I recommend a listen you may be astonished.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Falsifiability is the assertion that for any hypothesis to have credence, it must be inherently disprovable before it can become accepted as a scientific hypothesis or theory.
Is the hypothesis that “The truth has been hidden by science for almost 200 years” falsifiable?
Try this, if you dare:
Create an environment where no viral (eg: flu) infection can occur according to the “terrain” constraints of Antoine Béchamp. If there’s a qualified medical doctor / chemist who believes as you do who is still alive, you may ask for their advice instead. Century old medicine and chemistry is not as reliable nor useful.
Live there for a week or two so that your body reaches homeostasis and the environment is verified as “clean” and you can remain healthy.
Have someone with the flu visit, and kiss them deeply and long enough (or which ever transmission mechanism suits) that these alleged “lying scientists / scientific theories” would be satisfied that viral transmission had occurred. Flu is good but given you and your ilk’s confidence in this, I’d welcome ebola or similar and the appropriate “lying scientists” chosen method of transmission.
Infected person leaves and your routine in the “clean terrain / environment” continues for as long as the alleged “lying scientist / science” says the incubation for the chosen virus lasts.
Measure viral load in the anti-virus believer, or observe symptoms if “lying scientist / science” viral load measuring data is consider also a lie. Hopefully being incredibly ill or dying will provide sufficient evidence of viral load.
Repeat this with 1000 randomly chosen anti-virus believers for a good sample size representative of the population of anti-virus believers.
(Optional) allow an alleged “lying scientist / doctor” to apply the alleged “lying science” remedy to the chosen viral infection and after the expected cure time, measure viral load or health indicators for recovery.
This is a loose description of a method for providing falisfiability test for the hypothesis you have presented and this article claims to be self evident and true.
Get back to me with your results.
Reply
Doug Harrison
| #
None of the three comments above have given a shred of evidence as to why this article should be taken down. Instead they demonstrate what is wrong with discourse on these matters; ie If you don’t follow the accepted meme on any subject, whether it be about viruses or climate we will shout you down. All three are part of the problem and offer no real solutions.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Au contraire. The burden of proof is on the person who brings a claim, not the other way around.
I see no evidence here that “cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself”.
Perhaps when you get cancer you will revel in it as your body “heals itself” via the cancer, but most people either die or get stuck into chemo and other interventions.
As for being pro-anti-vaxxer… yeah that’s not scientific. It’s also a very old phenomenon. Hopefully you won’t say the same thing when they start publishing articles here about the earth being flat and advocating for a geocentric model of the solar system. Open minded or not.
Sure, have an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out.
Reply
William Kay
| #
I am going to take a wild guess and say “anonymous” is a chess addict named Trung. Let it go, man. Let it go!
Reply
Dev
| #
Thank you for posting this John O’Sullivan and for your comment Doug Harrison.
Both actions show open mindedness and willingness to open discourse.
Montagnier and Gallo arrived at 2 different characterisations for the so called HIV particle.
The Perth group openly discuss in their papers (which are easy to find and follow) the lack of evidence that HIV causes AIDS and posit that HIV was and never has been correctly isolated and therefore not conclusively isolated. Furthermore there are inconsistencies in proof connecting the virus with pathogenicity.
It has been shown however that AZT causes the symptoms of aids.
(I have previously had contact with a person who was diagnosed with HIV and subjected to 10 yrs of AZT treatment, ruining his life, almost causing his death and he was contacted 7 or so yrs ago by the diagnosing clinic to be told that they had made a misdiagnosis)
https://www.virusmyth.com/aids/perthgroup/geneva/printable.htm
http://www.theperthgroup.com/whatargued.html
The same claim is aimed at coronavirus and other pathogenic viruses.
Indirect methodology used for isolation. Causation of pathogenicity is claimed to be viral whereas cellular support substrates are often toxic as are vectors for cellular viral particle innoculation.
Transparency is not forthright and assumption is rife. Dr kaufman illustrates this in his video demonstrations as does Eleni Papadopoulos et al in her papers and subsequent discussions.
As Doug Harrison points out, precisely the same treatment of scientific method for climate has been applied to healthcare although the corruption has been occurring in medicine for a lot longer and has been thoroughly embedded into medical education the curriculum which is dominated by pharmaceutical authoritarianism.
Industrially farmed foods are largely the norm. They lack balanced mineral content – NKP + CaCo3 salts are standardized soil treatment. Not many are aware of the true impact of these harsh chemical salts on the health of the soil in terms of bacterial and fungal activity that is so essential to plant health!
Glyphosate is almost ubiquitous in crop treatment, Supermarkets import food-stock now from all over the world so almost all are now effected by glyphosate contamination. Not too much research has been done in this area but it is on the horizon.
https://jennifermargulis.net/glyphosate-and-covid-19-connection/
(Also if anyone is interested Morley Robbins conducted a small meta study of around 5000 peer reviewed pubmed and other articles (primary) showing that magnesium has over 3000 binding sites in the human body not 300 as most medical professionals think. Its estimated ~75% are Mg deficient in the USA and it would be similar in most other developed countries. If I find the links I will post.)
Society as a whole have become dependent on health care for almost every ailment, most caused by lack of balanced nutrition & widespread/varied toxicities – FDA & CDC revolving door being the easiest access to global markets.
Heres the thing – No one is questioning the routine over use of Statins, betablockers, blood-thinners, anticoagulents, proton pump inhibitors, ace inhibitors etc
These drugs all have very serious side effects when used long term.
The age groups that these types of drugs are most commonly administered to are the elderly and infirm.
Many are based on/derived from petrochemicals, fluorine’s, venoms and interfere with an already out of balance bodily system nourished form a chemically contaminated diet that is largely trash. Though I concede that some do make the effort to source higher quality foodstuffs!
If the article on this page has any truth to it, then it would seem to correlate with the view proposed by Dr Kaufman and others re: exosomes.
It might then follow that with each new drug analogue, if toxic (even mildly & with long term use) and not recognised by the human body, might provoke a cellular or blood (or both) reaction causing production of unique/new exosomes geared to deal with the specific drug toxicity.
Pharma tend to deal in LD50 numbers to mitigate toxicity in drug systems which is ridiculous really.
Is it any wonder that many of the big Pharmaceutical companies are now granted legal indemnity.
If their drugs and vaccines were so safe why would this be a requirement?
If this serious cold is doing the rounds – then is it any wonder that it is ripping through the elderly and infirm community’s globally?
Reply
John O'Sullivan
| #
Thanks, Dev. Yes, open debate is the key. Too often people are closed-minded to ideas that conflict with their preconceptions. We can see strong parallels between climate ‘science’ and how Big Pharma operates. You have set out some excellent ideas and information in your comment that could form the basis of a superb PSI article. Please feel free to compose and submit, if you have the time and inclination, and we would be delighted to post.
Reply
Dev
| #
Thank you John, much appreciated.
Reply
Finn McCool
| #
Hi Dev,
Some very interesting comments. I hope you can expand upon them.
Many years ago, I developed an interest in Bacteriophages. I’ve always wondered why Big Pharma never developed them.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Let me see if I get what you’re saying here.
https://principia-scientific.com/5g-health-dangers-100s-of-respected-scientists-sound-alarm/
“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk”
“…as well as possible increased risks of certain types of tumors in the brain and adrenal glands.”
https://principia-scientific.com/5g-warning-by-institute-of-electrical-and-electronics-engineers/
“issues a stark public warning of grave cancer risks from any mass roll out of 5G telecoms technology.”
https://principia-scientific.com/5g-to-kill-the-birds-bees-and-your-loved-ones/
“Number of scientists claim radio-frequency radiation (RFR) from mobile phones and other electronic equipment causes health impacts, including cancers.”
https://principia-scientific.com/the-deception-of-virology-vaccines-why-cv-19-is-not-contagious/
“Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself, by cocooning dead cells in a tumor in which the body is incapable of removing properly so that it can dissolve and cleanse those cells from the body at a later time.”
Based on articles from this website, we can conclude that 5G roll-out has the potential to cause mass instances of people’s bodies healing themselves.
Surely an article praising the intended roll-out of 5G will be published any day now.
Reply
4TimesAYear
| #
I will agree with one thing: that viruses are not alive. The question arises, though – how do colds and flu travel from one person to another – because if you are in a room with a person who has a cold for a given period of time, you most likely will catch it – unless your immune system is healthy enough to remain unaffected. The same goes for the flu. Whole families contract COVID. Others when exposed to the same virus, do not. The only explanation I can see is a healthy immune system. That said, I do think that they need to rethink viruses and why it is so many people in NY ended up with COVID. How does that happen if not through acquiring it from another human being in some way?
Reply
Dev
| #
Hi 4TimesAYear,
In groups we are to a great extent exposed to the same/similar chemicals and toxins in our local environment, eat similar foods sourced from similar areas, treated by ubiquitously common chemical concoctions, We also react like a herd susceptible to suggestion and mass hysteria.
We also suffer similar nutrient deficiencies both vitamin and mineral.
& exposed to similar drug treatments and vaccinations.
If viral expression is utilised to expel toxins then being in the same environment would also expose many to similar bacterial and fungal expressions which would still be in active phase. That way it could be perceived that contagious colds/flu spread.
We’ve all been exposed to groups where individuals have slightly differing levels of symptoms and sometimes dont catch anything at all or just get miild symptoms while others get bed ridden!
It could be that each new chemical/medication comes a new viral (exosomal/somatid) response – this could be interpreted as a mutation promoted by the research community as such and promoted as such.
Why is it that people are willing to believe that the unseen unproven lifeless pathogenic viral particle is the cause of disease but completely ignore the 80,000 + inadequately tested chemicals as the cause of disease?
This attitude just doesn’t make sense!
Re-examination with an open mind is required.
Climate/AGW was hijacked as many readers here know.
Is it not also clear that medicine has also been hijacked.
In both cases, hijacked by those with unlimited amounts of money at their disposal and control of a media machine that will not under any circumstances stop.
Jon Rappoport writes widely about all of this.
There has been a shift in the perception of allopathic medicine in recent years with more Dr’s jumping ship and anti-vaccination advocacy groups growing in number.
This I feel has been achieving increasing momentum and this is why we are seeing and experiencing the extreme measures of state authoritarianism & media support presently.
Individualism and independence threatens globalist agenda’s such as Agenda 21/30
Reply
Scouse Billy
| #
Lol you beat me to it – at least we’re on the same page 😉
Reply
Scouse Billy
| #
The short answer to your question is perhaps the “virus”/exosome is already in all of us or at least it is produced in response to environmental toxins (inc. emf) and/or immune/nutritional deficiencies (e.g. vit D in the colder months).
In other words the spread is an illusion, albeit a convenient one for pedlars of pharmaceuticals.
The illusion and it’s mass media reinforcement has spawned a religious fervor in the masses which is enabling draconian anti-human legislation, mutual fear, restriction of movement and forced “medication” contrary to the Nuremberg Codes.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
While I have serious questions about the hypothesis proposed I certainly believe that it should be offered for examination. We should not forget that it was the absolutely ridiculous ides that the Earth revolved around the sun (Everybody can see with their own eyes that the Earth is the center of the universe.) that led to what we call science.
I would hypothesize that viruses are nature’s gene splicers and they are the cause of evolution, not rare and almost always detrimental mutations.
An alien invasion of a planet is far more likely to be in the form of a virus to convert the existing life into another form of life rather than a giant armada os spaceships. Perhaps Kurt Vonnegut was right and the purpose of human existence is to get a part to a stranded spaceship on Saturn so it can continue to spread viruses and colonize the universe.
Reply
Carl
| #
Anonymous appears to draw his/her perspective of micro-biology from an obscure 19th century rival of Louis Pasteur called Antoine Béchamp. “The truth has been hidden by science for almost 200 years, yet was revealed long ago in the 1800s by scientists such as Antoine Béchamp, who documented in his own experiments that viruses are terrain dependent, non-living agents that break down waste matter, that they come from within, not from without.”
Anonymous then directs you to dismiss 150 years of scientific research in the fields of micro-biology, immunology, virology, mycology, parasitology, food preservation, etc. and would have surgeons abandon the practices of sterilizing surgical instruments and wearing sterile gowns, gloves and masks in the operating room. Why? Because according to him/her there are no innately pathogenic micro-organisms. I would suggest that Anonymous take a college level course in micro-biology but Anonymous seems predisposed to believe that everything learned and taught within the field of the various fields of micro-biology over the past 150 years is wrong. “Forget everything you think you know about viruses and bacteria [i.e., 150 years of scientific research.] You have been lied to,” says Anonymous
One is, of course, free to believe anything that one wants, but for me I don’t buy Anonymous’ assertion that none of the following viral diseases are contagious:
a. smallpox (Apparently the blankets that were given to the Native Americans by the British and French that had been used by smallpox patients were perfectly harmless and the Native Americans simply created within themselves the smallpox virus that killed more than 50% of the infected tribes.)
b. measles
c. mumps
d. rubella
e. chicken pox
f. polio
g. rabies (Apparently one cannot catch rabies from a rabid dog!)
h. ebola
i. hanta fever
j. dengue fever
k. H1N1 flu
l. SARS
m. Epstien-Barr
n. COVID-19
etc., etc., etc.
Again, according to Antoine Béchamp (whose musings Anonymous is parroting) all of these viral diseases “come from within.” That is, they are created by the body’s own DNA and therefore cannot be “caught” from someone else nor can they be “given” to someone else. Good luck with convincing people that they cannot catch rabies from a rabid dog.
Reply
Al Shelton
| #
Thanks Carl…
I have to agree. The Anon claim is too far fetched for me…….
Reply
Dev
| #
I would ask what position do you take on the AGW debate?
Warmist
Luke warmist
Realist
?
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Classic tu quoque rejoinder.
Reply
Matt
| #
Hi Aaron. Interjection to deny democratic speaking rights is a similar game of power and control. It is a shame science has been drop kicked all the way to North Korea. In effect handing a win to the climate alarmists for a longer period.
Oh for “august” governance.
Reply
Squidly
| #
Matt, what are “democratic” speaking rights ???
Not sure what political ideology/structure has to do with “speaking rights”. This is a very curious and confusing statement by you.
If you are indeed referring to “Democracy” in that statement, then I would suggest to you that “Democracy” and “Speaking Rights” are antithetical. A “Democracy” is the voice of the majority to the exclusion of the minority .. that is NOT “speaking rights” .. that is the opposite .. that is oppressive, not inclusive.
Matt Holl
| #
Hi Squidly. Lessons of history, common sense, empirical knowledge, and science often run counter to belief systems and personal agendas.
All members of a society have a right to be heard and often we ask others to speak on our behalf.
Very occasionally somebody will speak on our behalf with fidelity but usually the minority you mention do not have their insights appraised and evaluated. The minority are often more informed or are fools trying to swim up waterfalls. (chose your battles wisely. Sun Tzu)
The mandate of an informed society where differing views have been appraised and evaluated will often have a person speaking on their behalf interjected to close down informed decision making.
Tu quoque rejoinder and mass murder of members of a society are differing ends to the same tyranny.
We all possess some tyranny but those who are aware of it are sometimes less the hipocrite.
mark
| #
Dev, what does your comment/question have to do with anything? They are unrelated? What? Someone doesn’t conform tp your beliefs on one thing, so you must check to see if they conform to your beliefs on another? People cannot hold contrary or opposing beliefs? Just what is meant by your question?
Reply
mark
| #
Dev, what does your comment/question have to do with anything? They are unrelated? What? Someone doesn’t conform tp your beliefs on one thing, so you must check to see if they conform to your beliefs on another? People cannot hold contrary or opposing beliefs? Just what is meant by your question?
Reply
Mark
| #
Dev, what in the world does one have to with the other?
Reply
Mark
| #
Dev, what in the world does one have to with the other?
Reply
Mark
| #
Dev, what in the world does one have to with the other?
Reply
Mark
| #
Dev, what in the world does one have to with the other?
Reply
Mark
| #
Dev, what in the world does one have to with the other?
Reply
Dev
| #
Simple reasoning to the question.
If a thief is caught stealing once, has a suspected past of stealing and adept at spin, bribery & corruption to evade incarceration and has the resources to do so, then:
a/ is the thief likely to have as suspected, stolen before?
b/ likely to continue stealing?
hopefully this analogy is self explanatory!
At the public face – government has been guilty of forging ahead with wars despite lack of tangible evidence, the Iraq war was a prime example no wmd’s found death and destruction the result with flagrant looting of resources and control of infrastructure, The imperial past of conquering other nations & their resources is ignored as thats just how it used to be! we’re are no longer like that as we’re now cultivated educated civilised! The government facilitation of arms dealing (real wmd’s) has been on a gargantuan scale but this is simply framed as defence but not machinations of death! ignoring revolving door politics ensuring vast profits for all involved.
How many smallholders lost their livelihoods during foot and mouth based on assumption with no evidence other than computer modelling iirc.
Mark Purdey’s work is worthy of more than a cursory view!
There are so many telltale signs that belie the malevolent nature of government both historically and presently not least the continued deceit and censorship of all other information pertaining to this . Look no further than mainstream media outlets who are clearly colluding with government and other special interest groups to control the present corona – narrative.
The list of so called pathogenic viruses might just as well be explained by toxic environmental exposures, naturally occurring or artificial: lead, cadmium, mercury, nickel, aluminium and petrochemical adulterants, pesticides, herbicides and rodenticides, mining plant/ waste, contaminated water tables coupled with areas of poor soil mineral balance/deficit & lack of access to good nutrition clean water, adequate sanitation. This would result susceptibility to bacterial and fungal infection as well as exposure to metal and chemical toxicity.
The US settlers also deprived the native indians of their way of life, slaughtered vast herds of bison and relegated them to specific restricted territory’s.
Did this not also result in the demise/starvation of their populations and would it not also be easy or possible to inoculate the said blankets with any manner of poison? to be passed off as something else instead.
Polio didn’t emerge en-masse until the introduction of Lead arsenate as a pesticide!
One thing appears to be certain and that is over the past 1000 years the mass of populations have been presided over by a mere few (relative to the mass).
Why has it been necessary to run society’s this way? to never change from this model?
Fear based predicament has consistently been the tool for control!
The banking system is yet another area that requires deep scrutiny, both historically and presently.
Is there no suspicion of this leviathan organisation that asset strips the entire globe through a perpetual debt (usury) system and who’s operatus morandi is above government level. Granted the UK central bank is now supposedly government owned but has retained operational independence, so it can still be argued that nothing has really changed.
Why are Keynesian economic models prevalent over Austrian?
& Where was the public involvement in the creation of the league of nations, its dissolution and reinvention as the UN? which now dictates to policy to governments. This is rhetorical as it was a top down enacted mechanism for the public good apparently.
If the government (or any other authority) is now misleading the public re: coronavirus, misled public opinion re: AGW, misled the public over Iraq wmds, milead the public over 911, Afghanistan, mad cow disease, the creation of the EU, the war in vietnam, ~50 Coup d’état’s conducted by the US (Pilger made this statement in the documentary the war on democracy)
If these problems with governance exist now have existed in recent memory, then WHY is it so unbelievable to think that these problems with authority haven’t always existed!
I am not stating that I am correct in any of this.
Nor am I stating that I am incorrect.
But I am stating that I am open to a great deal of further inquiry!
To harangue open minded inquiry with regurgitated dogma is not to our individual or collective benefit.
Everything is always questionable always.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Your comment looks like a laundry list of conspiracy theories, not unlike the flat earth arguments against heliocentrism.
Using falsifiability seems really simple here. Can they cure (alleged, to you) issues caused by germs and viruses, whilst leaving the person in the same environment? Yes, they can.
Can you prove at all, that “cancer is one way the body heals itself” or “cells will conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing specific non-living solvents know as viruses.”?
Given the symptoms of viral infections abound, and the numbers of people dying from cancer, you’d think there were more than enough subjects for such simple falsifiability experiments.
Please link me to some, thanks.
Jeff G.
| #
Since I am ‘Anonymous’, I will answer your question. Rabies does not exist, period.
“St. George’s Hospital, London, records 4,000 patients bitten by dogs supposed to have been mad. No case of hydrophobia.
“In the record of all the diseases which have occurred at the Pennsylvania Hospital in one hundred and forty years, only two cases which were supposed to be hydrophobia have occurred. One of these, however, the only one submitted to bacteriological test, did not confirm the diagnosis, ‘hydrophobia’ and the local health authorities refused to register the death as due to rabies.”
Dr. Charles W. Dulles, lecturer on the History of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, who was appointed by the Medical Societies of the state to investigate rabies stated that he is “inclined to the view that there is no such specific malady” because after sixteen years of investigation he had “failed to find a single case on record that can be conclusively proved to have resulted from the bite of a dog or any other cause.” The report and Dr. Woods’ letter were endorsed by Dr. Theophilus Parvin of Jefferson Medical College and President of the National Academy of Medicine; Dr. Thomas G. Morten, Coroners Physician; Dr. Charles K. Mills of the University of Pennsylvania and Dr. Thomas I. Mays of the Polyclinic Hospital.
There are over 3.000 deaths on record in reports from the Pasteur Institute, of persons bitten by dogs. All died after treatments. On the other hand, the record of the London Hospital, a few years ago, showed 2,668 persons bitten by angry dogs: not one of them developed hydrophobia and not one had been treated by the Pasteur method.”
—Rabies Past Present in Scientific Review – Millicent Morden – The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination, 1956, by Eleanor McBean M.D., N.D.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
https://principia-scientific.com/5g-to-kill-the-birds-bees-and-your-loved-ones/
“Number of scientists claim radio-frequency radiation (RFR) from mobile phones and other electronic equipment causes health impacts, including cancers.”
https://principia-scientific.com/the-deception-of-virology-vaccines-why-cv-19-is-not-contagious/
“Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself, by cocooning dead cells in a tumor in which the body is incapable of removing properly so that it can dissolve and cleanse those cells from the body at a later time.”
I look forward to an article embracing the “body healing” properties of 5G roll-out any day now.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Can you let me know if you’ve banned me from the site? I’ll stop wasting time trying to comment if that’s the case. I get an error page every time I attempt to submit a comment.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
After all, banning people who disagree with “cancer is the body healing itself” is one way for robust discussion to occur, clearly.
Reply
Aaron Christiansen
| #
Every article on this site regarding 5G implies it’s bad because it causes cancer / tumours.
This article says, “”Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself, by cocooning dead cells in a tumor in which the body is incapable of removing properly so that it can dissolve and cleanse those cells from the body at a later time.”
The logical conclusion of these two juxtaposed ideas is that 5G roll-out should be celebrated as a mechanism for inducing wide-spread bodily healing within the population.
I look forward to reading that article.
Reply
Jeff G.
| #
What I stated in my writing about cocooning is scientifically sound and correct. Cancer is a way the body tries to heal itself. Cancer is the inability of the body to regulate cells properly and remove dead or dying cells, usually due to lymphatic congestion wherein lymphatic fluids do not move properly in the lymphatic system. Tumors are formed to house these dead cells so that the body can gradually dissolve them over time. Cancer is a necessary byproduct of manmade environmental toxicity. The body has many ways to cleanse and heal in times of toxicity, and cancer is one such way the body does that.
Your previous comments:
“Can you prove at all, that “cancer is one way the body heals itself” or “cells will conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing specific non-living solvents know as viruses.”?”
Viruses are parts and functions of the immune system response. Cells work in whole units. As I wrote in the article, non-living viruses are manufactured when tissues in and around cells are too toxic for living microbes to consume without being poisoned to death. Viruses are then manufactured by utilizing viral proteins already existing in the genome and in the cell to dissolve debris. Viruses are encoded with RNA or DNA by the nucleus, and in the cytoplasm to dissolve specific tissue, aided by white blood cell antibodies once leaving the cell. There are 320,000 variants of viruses inherent to animals and humans. — S.J. Anthony et al., “A strategy to estimate unknown viral diversity in mammals,” mBio, e00598-13, 2013. — (320,000 viral strains).
Reply
Joel Walbert
| #
On the bright side of this idiotic mess, ‘germ theory’ has been utterly decimated by the ‘official’ statistics. Even with all the forging of death certificates, they could not blame a single death from this unless one or more of the laundry list of co-factors was in play. Some are so blinded by their quest for power (for power’s sake) that they fail to see they show their hand almost every time.
Reply
Jeff G.
| #
Hello, I am the author of this piece. It was taken from a post I made on Reddit under the username JGCS7 some time ago and is in my book ‘The Age of Deception’.
Reply
Jeff G.
| #
More of my material:
Jeff G. — Viral Misconceptions – Presentation on The True Nature of Viruses
https://youtu.be/MtWYQS3LFlE
virusesarenotcontagious.com
Original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/fcjwrg/the_deception_of_virology_vaccines_why/
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Jeff,
When Columbus first landed in America he was greeted by the Caribe tribe. When he returned the Caribe had disappeared, although they did not have wars or weapons. If it wasn’t the measles or some other virus that killed them off what pollution did the sailing ships bring that so altered their environment that they all perished?
Herb
Reply
Jeff G.
| #
Hi Herb. Native American Indians were wiped out due to the destruction of their food supply, and the poisoning of their waters. This, in turn, caused disease. For example, smallpox symptoms are from severe poisoning of the body. Both measles and smallpox are skin eruptions wherein toxins expel through the skin. Smallpox is more extended and severe.
There are those that also claim the Indians were infected via blankets, however:
Historian Philip Ranlet of Hunter College and author of a 2000 article on the smallpox blanket incident in Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies, also casts doubt. “There is no evidence that the scheme worked,” Ranlet says.
Historians usually attribute most of the deaths to the spread of diseases for which native people had no immunity, but recently historian Andrés Reséndez has pushed back against this, arguing that populations were lower than previously estimated, and “a nexus of slavery, overwork and famine killed more Indians in the Caribbean than smallpox, influenza and malaria.”
I stand by this and assert that Native Indian’s natural raw food supply was killed off, their waters poisoned, their diets changed, and were turned into slaves, leading to diseases of all kinds to try to balance the toxic effects of toxic food, lack of proper nutrition, and stress on their bodies.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
H Jeff,
I wasn’t talking about what happened to native Americans after the invasion but right after the discovery.
Columbus came to the Caribbean islands in 1492. He sailed back to Europe leaving 2 men with the tribe on Cuba. When he returned in 1493 the Caribe tribe he first met were gone. The two crew members left had been killed by the host tribe.
The eradication of the Caribe tribe had nothing to do with depletion of resources by the two Spaniards or poisoning their water. That all came later but something killed off the Caribe tribe in one year and it wasn’t war, starvation, or any change in the conditions they had lived with for centuries.
Herb
Reply
Jeff G.
| #
Can you provide a source for this information so that I too can read what you have? This seems like a case of manipulation of history. Furthermore, measles wouldn’t have wiped out the entirety of the Caribe tribe because measles is a mild illness. There was a whole lot of manipulation going on with those tribes to make them slaves, etc.
Columbus had a journal of the second voyage, but there are only pieces left. What we do know is from indirect sources.
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Jeff,
I can’t provide any references it is something I learned long ago that stuck with me. It could well be that neighboring tribes who were violent eradicated them but my guess is a virus. The things that happen don’t change only the interpretation of the events called history.
Measles has become milder over time as most pathogens do. It is to the advantage of all that the host does not die. It was and is quite a serious disease for those with no immunity. You should look it up on Wikipedia.
I am interested in why you consider a virus a non-living thing. What do you define as life.? A cell has a nucleus that replicates its DNA and splits into two cells. How is that different than a virus?
Herb
Jeff G.
| #
I looked high and low for verification that the Caribes were not present on Columbus’s 2nd voyage as you said, and there is none. I have to conclude then that if there is no source to verify your historical belief, then you wrongly remembered.
A virus is not alive as a cell is alive. A virus has no nucleus, digestive system, or anything that would make it alive. They are RNA/DNA encoded proteins that function only with the help of white blood cells. They are nothing like living cells or microbes.
Also, measles is not increasingly less severe. That is simply not true. Toxicity dictates the amount of viral replications nessesary to dissolve toxicity—not the virus. It is the toxin(s) that determines the outcome of a virus and how it will behave.