The Cold Chill of the Heat Pump Reality
Those installing heat pumps now are in for a nasty shock 15–20 years down the line when their costly, noisy, power-hungry government-subsidised outdoor heat exchangers come to the end of their lives and need replacing. There are unlikely to be any grants or subsidies around then
According to the Telegraph some of the early birds are already suffering from buyer’s remorse:
Peter and Anne Watts (pictured – Ed) made headlines when they became one of around four British households to have an air-source heat pump fitted in 2008.
That Mr and Mrs Watts, 88 and 82 respectively, had installed a heat pump a decade before the likes of Boris Johnson seized upon them as the future of home heating was highly unusual.
“We had a reporter up from the local paper asking us about our solar panels and our heat pump,” recalls Mr Watts. “In the days afterwards, we got a call from the BBC – I thought it was a prank call from the neighbours.”
Yet 17 years on, the pump is nearing the end of its lifespan – and the price tag for a replacement is £17,000, around £10,000 more than they paid for their original.
Mr and Mrs Watts are in a highly unique quandary – one that shines a light on the shortcomings of the Government’s heat pump drive.Households currently benefit from a £7,500 grant to install a new pump, thanks to the generous Boiler Upgrade Scheme run by the energy department. But no such generosity exists for early adopters whose systems are now nearing their end.
It begs the question: how do households – who relied on low prices or government grants to get their heat pump fitted the first time around – afford its replacement?
Unfortunately, Mr and Mrs Watts can’t retrofit a gas boiler because a) they’re not on the gas grid and b) because the house was expensively renovated with the installation of a heat pump in mind.
Now it seems they haven’t the cash for a new heat pump. That’s an interesting development since it’s often the well-heeled retired who have the resources and time to fit a heat pump in the first place.
Unfortunately, if they live long enough their dwindling incomes turn the ageing heat pumps into a time bomb:
The couple, who ran a business selling animal feed and now live off a private pension, cannot afford a new heat pump. They have already stripped back on holidays since electricity prices first rose.
It is a problem that the pair, who live in a four-bedroom detached house in Buckinghamshire, did not foresee when they became one of the first British households to have an air-source heat pump installed.
Back when they installed the pump the whole idea was to future-proof their bills by investing in more efficient and cheaper-to-run equipment.
Moreover, there were no grants back then though they did enjoy an advantageous scheme of selling the power they generated from solar panels back to the grid. Mr and Mrs Watts make around £900 per annum that way.
However, the cost of electricity has soared and heat pumps use so much it’s difficult for a domestic solar panel system to do more than make a dent in the running costs:
Almost two decades later, Mr Watts is doubtful the switch saved him much money, because in more recent years, so-called all-electric houses like his have been hamstrung by high electricity rates. “We don’t save a lot relative to oil and gas, but I would still recommend any house with a heat pump also gets solar panels,” he says.
Since they have no choice but to replace their heat pump or wait in trepidation for their existing one to break down, Mr and Mrs Watts are hoping their early loyalty will make it possible to obtain a discounted replacement:
After being approached by the Telegraph, a spokesman for the company said: “We value Mr Watts’ loyalty and appreciate his contribution to promoting heat pumps. If Mr Watts wishes to upgrade his system, Daikin has offered to supply a discounted heat pump.”
A Government spokesman said: “Heat pumps are three times more efficient than gas boilers, enabling families to save around £100 a year by using a smart tariff.”
£100 a year.
If Mr and Mrs Watts can get a discounted heat pump for, say, £10,000 (a very optimistic prospect) they should be able to recover the replacement costs in only 100 years when both are over 180.
Except by then they’d have had to replace the new heat pump at least five times.
It’s highly unlikely anyone currently buying a heat pump will find their installers lining up to offer them a discounted replacement in the 2040s, having been prompted by the Telegraph to do so.
With VAT imminent on heat pumps, the government has some solutions up its sleeve. One of them is to lock householders into debt to pay for them. The Government spokesman went on:
There is zero VAT on heat pumps until March 2027. Overall installation costs are coming down and will continue to do so for all consumers as the market develops. We are also exploring private finance options, such as loans, to support homeowners with the upfront costs of heat pumps.
It can be safely assumed that the cost of servicing those loans will exceed the nominal savings from a heat pump of £100 a year.
Presumably, the loans will run the risk of still being paid off when the heat pump needs replacing, necessitating further loans for a new one.
One day there may be millions of pensioners living in houses with failing or failed heat pumps that they cannot possibly afford either to run or replace or obtain loans to do either.
See more here dailysceptic.org
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Gregoryno6
| #
It’s a similar situation in Australia with rooftop solar panels. And I don’t know what the situation is for recycling heat pumps, but recycling solar panels is costly and reclaims only the metal components. The actual glass panels and their coatings are treated as waste.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Readers,
“It is a problem that the pair, who live in a four-bedroom detached house in Buckinghamshire, did not foresee when they became one of the first British households to have an air-source heat pump installed.”
I have to ask: Why is anyone concerned about an old couple who still lives in ‘a four-bedroom detached house in Buckinghamshire”?
Have a good day
Reply
Howdy
| #
I have to ask: Why is anyone concerned about an old couple who still lives in ‘a four-bedroom detached house in Buckinghamshire”?
Because they represent the type of people who will be hit hardest by casual climate claims leading to serious difficulties in keeping warm using ‘cutting edge’ decrepit technology after falling for the BS?
They are an early example of just how much money green tech does not save, and is now highly visible to UK residents as bills, and replacement costs go through the roof.
I guess at the time they didn’t count on the future, but that is the single biggest influence in any choice these days.
It’s an example to all about the future being out of one’s control. Don’t count your chickens until they’ve hatched.
Reply
ron cirotto
| #
As an Canadian Engineer, we take a serious oath during our graduation induction (The sons of Martha) I feel I must speak out because if we dont push back the frontiers of scientific ignorance then we are not worthy of wearing our Engineers ring on our pinky on our working hand.
Its a simple fact for ENGINEERS to understand; an air source heat pump CANNOT ever be as efficient as a deep, under ground heat pump. Period! Its simple physics! The heat exchanger for the deep ground heat pump becomes more efficient the deeper you go in the Earth. The closer you get to the centre of the Earth the more the greater the temperature DIFFERENCE> Heat and Energy is driven by temperature differences, the bigger the difference the more energy you can extract. ANYONE who tells you differently is lying to your face. Digging up the earth or property you own to burry coils (heat exchanger) is EXPENSIVE. There are no free lunches when it comes to temperature differences. Its that simple, … so dont let some slick shoe salesman sell you on the COP nonsense, “coefficient of performance”.
Its meaningless when you compare an air heat pump vs a buried deep ground heat pump.
Sadly Barham and Bailey ‘s saying is so true. Knowledge is power.
Reply
Nick Schroeder
| #
Natural gas at $6/E6Btu burned in a modern condensing furnace (air) or water heater with 85% efficiency has a net delivered cost of $7/E6Btu.
Electricity at $0.15/kWh and 100% efficiency powering a furnace (air) or water heater has a net delivered cost of about $40/E6Btu.
A heat pump using $0.15/kWh and a COP of 3.5 has a net delivered cost of about $12/E6Btu.
The colder the weather the lower the COP and higher the net cost.
If your salesman suggests replacing NG w heat pump & does not know this he is uninformed.
If he suggests replacing NG w heat pump & does know this, he is a crook.
Reply
Howdy
| #
Parliament and actual heat pump use:
Richard Tice, Reform MP, said: “Parliament has installed three heat pumps, and every one of them has faced complaints for consuming too much electricity and generating excessive noise.
“Despite this, Labour pushes ahead with forcing the rest of us to adopt them, while refusing to use heat pumps themselves.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/net-zero/parliament-heat-pump-rollout-suspended-noise-concerns
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/net-zero/parliament-heat-pump-rollout-suspended-noise-concerns/
Then there’s this:
(Rupert) Lowe, in fact, is a major investor in green technology. He has at least a 15% stake in Kona Energy, a battery energy storage company working “to deliver a zero carbon future”. He also owns Alto Energy, a heat pump company.
https://hopenothate.org.uk/2025/02/17/hypocrisy-revealed-rupert-lowe-champion-of-natural-food-is-investor-in-lab-grown-bacteria-protein/
Greenie vs common sense, heat pump and trash food vs “stupid net zero”, little wonder there’s friction in the group..
Reply