Study Shows How Badly Big Pharma is Polluting Rivers Globally
A new study looking at the presence of pharmaceuticals in the world’s rivers found concentrations at potentially toxic levels in more than a quarter of the locations studied.
The new study looked at 258 rivers across the globe, including the Thames in London and the Amazon in Brazil, to measure the presence of 61 pharmaceuticals, such as carbamazepine, metformin and caffeine.
The researchers studied rivers in over half of the world’s countries—with rivers in 36 of these countries having never previously been monitored for pharmaceuticals.
The study forms part of the University of York-led Global Monitoring of Pharmaceuticals Project, which has expanded significantly over the last two years, with the new study becoming the first truly global-scale investigation of medicinal contamination in the environment.
With their latest study, the researchers found that:
- pharmaceutical pollution is contaminating water on every continent
- strong correlations between the socioeconomic status of a country and higher pollution of pharmaceuticals in its rivers (with lower-middle income nations the most polluted)
- high levels of pharmaceutical pollution was most positively associated with regions of high median age as well as high local unemployment and poverty rates
- the most polluted countries and regions of the world are the ones that have been researched the least (namely sub-saharan Africa, South America and parts of southern Asia).
- the activities most associated with the highest levels of pharmaceutical pollution included rubbish dumping along river banks, inadequate wastewater infrastructure and pharmaceutical manufacturing, and the dumping of the contents of residual septic tanks into rivers.
The study revealed that a quarter of the sites contained contaminants (such as sulfamethoxazole, propranolol, ciprofloxacin and loratadine) at potentially harmful concentrations.
The researchers hope that by increasing the monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment, they can develop strategies to limit the effects potentially caused by the presence of pollutants.
The study included noteworthy rivers such as the Amazon, Mississippi, Thames and the Mekong. Water samples were obtained from sites spanning from a Yanomami Village in Venezuela, where modern medicines are not used, to some of the most populated cities on the planet, such as Delhi, London, New York, Lagos, Las Vegas, and Guangzhou.
Areas of political instability such as Baghdad, the Palestinian West Bank and Yaoundé in Cameroon were also included. The climates where samples were obtained varied from high altitude alpine tundra in Colorado and polar regions in Antarctica, to Tunisian deserts.
While previous studies have monitored active pharmaceuticals ingredients (APIs) in rivers, these have ignored many of the countries of the world, have typically measured only a select few contaminants, and employed different analytical methods. Cumulatively, this has made it difficult to quantify the scale of the problem from a global perspective.
The water sample analysis occurred at the University of York’s Centre of Excellence in Mass Spectrometry.
Co-leader of the project Dr. John Wilkinson, from the Department of Environment and Geography, said: “With 127 collaborators across 86 institutions worldwide, the Global Monitoring of Pharmaceuticals Project is an excellent example of how the global scientific community can come together to tackle large-scale environmental issues.
“We’ve known for over two decades now that pharmaceuticals make their way into the aquatic environment where they may affect the biology of living organisms. But one of the largest problems we have faced in tackling this issue is that we have not been very representative when monitoring these contaminants, with almost all of the data focused on a select few areas in North America, Western Europe and China.
“Through our project, our knowledge of the global distribution of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment has now been considerably enhanced. This one study presents data from more countries around the world than the entire scientific community was previously aware of: 36 new countries to be precise where only 75 had ever been studied before.”
The researchers suggest their approach could also be expanded in the future to include other environmental media such as sediments, soils and biota, and could allow for the development of global-scale datasets on pollution.
See more here: phys.org/news
Header image: John Wilkinson
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Brian James
| #
JANUARY 21, 2022 CDC finds high levels of ‘forever chemical’ PFHxS in blood
WASHINGTON – High levels of a “toxic forever” chemical used in firefighting foam have been found in the blood of residents of a West Virginia community near an Air National Guard base.
https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news-release/2022/01/cdc-finds-high-levels-forever-chemical-pfhxs-blood
Reply
Tom
| #
If big pharma can’t force you to take their poison drugs, vaccines and mRNA injections, they will try and get you to drink them or eat them. Anything to make a buck and any method to poison people so they will get terribly sick and go to the medical system and pray for more drugs to make them well. In the end, its the drugs that kill them more than the diseases. You die and big pharma makes billions…nothing wrong with that apparently to the leaders of the world.
Reply
Howdy
| #
There’s far more than just pharma products in there, surely, and billions just using the toilet to throw away products, as well as simply urinating will expel enough into the system though, won’t it?
How much used engine oil has been thrown on ‘spare ground’, or down the local street drains?
The Ganges river, that is held as a Deity, the Mother of all, yet is pure filth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pH0fhLBr-Mg
Humanity simply doesn’t register it until it’s a matter of life and death. That bridge will be crossed when it’s arrived at. Even then, denial will reign. That’s the way it works in the world of the humans.
Reply