Study: Face masks DO harm children’s development

COVID rules are being blamed for a disturbing 23 percent fall in young children’s development and cognitive test results.

Social distancing measures including face masks are suspected of causing young children’s development to have drop by up to 23 per cent during the COVID pandemic, according to a new study.

Brown University scientists Sean CL Deoni, Jennifer Beauchemin, Alexandra Volpe, and Viren D’Sa, penned the review, in conjunction with the global consulting firm Resonance, collecting data from 1,600 children – and their caregivers – who have been enrolled in the study between the ages of 0 and 5 on a rolling basis.

The probe analyzed the cognitive development of the youngsters through infancy, childhood and adolescence, and looked at how average development scores in three key areas had been affected during the COVID era – with shocking results.

In the study, researchers first analyzed 1,070 assessments administered on 605 kids prior to March 2020, when COVID lockdowns and masking began.

Then, a further 154 assessments from 118 kids administered between March 2020 and June 2021, during the height of the pandemic, were carried out.

Meanwhile, 39 children born in 2018 and 2019 were analyzed over the course of the pandemic, into 2021.

The team then carried out checks on three widely accepted measures of child development – the early learning composite (ELC), verbal development quotient (VDQ), and non-verbal development quotient (NVDQ).

A child’s early learning composite is derived from their fine motor, visual reception, receptive, and expressive language scales, and is the early years equivalent to an IQ score.

The two development quotients measures how well a child is maturing in their language skills and other skills as compared with a sample of youngsters their own age.

Results showed the early learning composite mean result dropped by a whopping 23 per cent, from a high of just under 100 in 2019, to around 80 in 2020, and finally 77 in 2021.

Meanwhile, the verbal development quotient also dropped dramatically, from an average of 100 in 2018 to just below 90 in 2020, and around 70 in 2021.

The non-verbal development quotient also experienced a similar dip, from a mean score of around 105 in 2019, to 100 in 2020 and around 80 in 2021.

The study concluded that ‘children born during the pandemic have significantly reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance compared to children born pre-pandemic.’

‘In addition,’ the report adds, ‘masks worn in public settings and in school or daycare settings may impact a range of early developing skills, such as attachment, facial processing, and socioemotional processing.’

The authors said that boys from poor backgrounds were most at risk of a drop in cognitive testing scores, with richer parents better able to mitigate the effects of the pandemic.

They explained: ‘Comparing yearly mean scores since 2011, controlling for age, gender, demographic, and socioeconomic indicators, we find striking evidence of declining overall cognitive functioning in children beginning in 2020 and continuing through 2021.

‘We find that males appear significantly more impacted than females, and that higher socioeconomic status (SES, as measured by maternal education) helps buffer against this negative impact.

‘On a more individual level, we examined longitudinal pre and during-pandemic trends in the same children from 2018 to 2021, again finding declines in ability in 2020 and 2021.’

The study’s findings come as parents across the globe grapple with the idea that wearing masks may interfere with the natural learning experiences and communication skills of their young children.

‘There are sensitive periods in early childhood development in which language development and emotional development are really rapidly developing for the first few years of life,’ Ashley Ruba, a postdoctoral researcher in the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Child Emotion Lab, told CNN in August.

The doctor added that developing children need to see others’ subtle verbal or facial cues to accurately discern how someone is feeling – a skill that proves paramount as the youngster age.  

What’s more, not being able to see someone’s face also inhibits kids from picking up whether something or a situation is safe or dangerous, Ruba further asserted.

With that said, masks may not be thing spurring the drastic reduction in kids’ cognitive abilities, the study states, adding that there are likely a range of pandemic-related factors that can be blamed for the dip – specifically the lack of social interactions between the still-developing youths.

That came after schools were closed for in-person learning, with many experts blaming the lack of social contact for a boom in mental health issues among children, and some areas seeing a spike in youth suicides.

COVID infections tend to be harmless for younger children, with just 731 confirmed COVID deaths recorded for youngsters aged between 0 and 18 from March 2020 to November 24 2021, according to CDC figures.

That has seen many parents call for most restrictions to be lifted for children, particularly as children aged five and up can now get vaccinated.

Those who want kids to remain masked say there’s no way of knowing if a perfectly healthy child may suffer a severe COVID infection. They also highlight how children may not fall seriously-ill, but could still pass the infection onto an adult such as a parent, grandparent or teacher who could suffer serious or even deadly symptoms.

‘The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered the child health landscape, with pregnant mothers and individuals, and children living in a strikingly different economic, psychosocial, and educational environment than what was present just 18 months ago.

Against this environmental backdrop, unanswered questions remain regarding the impact of the work-from-home, shelter-in-place, and other public health policies that have limited social interaction and typical childhood experiences on early child neurodevelopment.’

It adds: ‘While socioeconomic factors appear to mitigate against the negative consequences of the pandemic, the primary factors underlying our observed trends remain unknown.

‘Understanding these factors are critical to helping ensure affected children rebound as the pandemic winds down and they re-enter daycares and schools; as well as implementing additional public health and educational policies that address the most affected of children, particularity those in lower income families.’

See more here: dailymail.co.uk

CGTN Europe

Bold emphasis added

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (6)

  • Avatar

    Doug Harrison

    |

    Yeah, yeah, yeah! Take the masks off the kids and then vaccinate them. Out of the fat and into the fire. When will these over educated idiots wake up to this scam???

    Reply

    • Avatar

      JaKo

      |

      Hi Doug,
      I’m afraid your “over educated idiots” are awake and most of them are very much part of the War on The People.
      Cheers, JaKo

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Andrew Pilkington

        |

        Hi guys,

        Mean’t to be about the Muzzles, but must bring the whole Covid narrative back into play, just to remind the ‘not so blessed’, that there is still an ‘allegedly’ “Deadly” disease out there to keep the “FEAR” ongoing.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          R Smith

          |

          830,000 dead in the U.S. and if you don’t know anyone that has died from it, then consider yourself extremely lucky. Ask anyone that’s survived a good dose if it’s serious or not. Masks aren’t the best protection against covid anymore. Vaccines are but the covidiots in this country don’t believe in them either. 62% vaccination rate and only 30% with the booster. That’s not cutting it. It’s the lowest of any developed nation. As for the study. It deserves consideration but seems a bit suspect. I mean who the hell is masking an infant? Everyone knows you can’t do that and how do you measure the IQ of a 1 year old? Also seems highly suspect that children from wealthy families are less affected than poorer families? Why wouldn’t mask wearing affect ALL young children equally? Can’t wait for the peer reviews (if this is even a real study). Seems odd that this research company(licensed in the UK) is seeking donations to “expose lies about covid-19”. It’s more likely that they are spreading them.

          Reply

  • Avatar

    J Cuttance

    |

    all of the above, plus they’re disgusting biohazards. There’s a reason we don’t blow our noses then wear our hankies on our face afterwards.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Anon

    |

    HEY! for a science site you sure don’t provide links to studies! Come on! Make with the links!

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via