Via Dr. Andrew Bostom.
Head of Forensic Pathology in Hamburg on covid19 autopsy findings: “not a single person w/out previous illness has died of the virus in Hamburg. All had cancer, chronic lung dis, were heavy smokers or heavily obese, or had diabetes or cardiovasc dis” 1/3 https://t.co/u4Pi9ntRT0 pic.twitter.com/PaSdh2UnF5
— Andrew Bostom (@andrewbostom) May 11, 2020
3/3 “By focusing strongly on the rather few negative processes, fears are created that are very burdensome. Covid-19 is a deadly disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a mostly harmless virus infection”
— Andrew Bostom (@andrewbostom) May 11, 2020
We are seeing this a lot lately.
Add it to the pile:
New York City: 99{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of fatalities of all age groups had underlying conditions
Italy: 98{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}
Britain: 95{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}https://t.co/uAhgn5I9anhttps://t.co/sxqTq51mvkhttps://t.co/TUNgUyFcJf— Karl Dierenbach (@Dierenbach) May 11, 2020
About the author: Jim Hoft is the founder of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.
Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Dan Knezacek
| #
Many people don’t trust doctors, and so won’t go and get checked-out until they are on death’s door! I know people like this. For this reason I am confident that even in the cases where it is claimed there was no comorbidity, there actually was! They just refused to see a doctor until it was too late! Or, they weren’t showing symptoms of the condition that they actually had!
Reply
chris
| #
I agree. If a person does get very ill and they don’t know that they had some previous illness then this will help them to find out what it is.
Reply
Brian James
| #
May 10, 2020 A Swiss Doctor on Covid-19
Less than 1% of the deceased were healthy persons, i.e. persons without pre-existing chronic diseases. Only about 30% of the deceased are women.
https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/
Reply
Charlie
| #
Well, of course they did. That’s how these kind of things work! Many many pre-existing underlying conditions of those listed here or some other, if the person acquires some new malady, that malady will be the reason for the death. To claim that they didn’t really die of Covid is at least disingenuous, and if not fraudulent. The simple way to look at it is if on May the 1st they were doing OK, on May the second got Covid, and on May 10 died – it was the fault of the Covid not the other condition. If not for Covid they would be alive today. To say we need to dismiss those who died because they had some underlying condition as not being part of the Covid casualties is contrary to the science standards and is inhuman; not only is that immoral and unethical and unemphatic, it goes against all precedents: We don’t use that standard in any other circumstance. There are many ways to example this, one is if someone is pushed off a building, the cause of death is traumatic injuries from being pushed off a building, pushed off a building is the reason for demise, because had that not happened, the person would be alive today. Good grief. All those who acquired Covid and then were a mortality before they recovered by definition died from it. If real medical people are thinking it should not be considered this way they should have their license pulled. And you guys need to stop promulgating this kind of stuff knowing it has no basis in the real science and is counter to actually treating this. Please only publish real science not this one-off anecdotal “facts” that are a distortion of the science. You should know better. Research and verify before you publish.
Reply
William Kay
| #
You make a valid point Charlie. There are many elderly people who are LIVING with cancer or LIVING with heart disease and they are chugging merrily along. If they get hit with a nasty flu bug it can kill them and we should not disregard them just because they had health issues. We should also not ignore the fact that aside from fatalities C-19 is making a whole lot of people sick even if it is for only a few weeks.
BUT
a) Fewer than 1 in 1000 infected people show symptoms.
b) “C-19 fatalities” are dying from respiratory arrest/pneumonia. Scores of microorganisms can produce these symptoms yet they only test for C-19.
c) Almost no-one under the age of 60 without serious medical problems dies from C-19
d) Death certification agencies in certain jurisdictions clearly have their thumb on the scale in favour of magnifying the problem.
e) These massive shutdowns were unnecessary.
f) They should have focused on protecting the vulnerable and the sure as hell didn’t!
Reply
chris
| #
Charlie, if a person is so sick that they would die from covid then they would die from the flu or cold. No one is saying that the covid didn’t push them over the edge, but it’s not the only reason for their death. If this was a deadly disease then covid would be the sole cause of death in healthy persons. That is what is meant by the death rate of something. It causes the death all by itself. The science shows that that isn’t the case. Once we are done with this covid thing people will still die, that won’t change.
Reply
Debra L
| #
Charlie, What I find absolutely amazing is that there are hundreds more just like you that want the diagnosis to be COVID rather than Cancer or Diabetes. I don’t know if this is an attention grabber for people or just plain sheep syndrome. If a person is in hospital has cancer and catches a cold and dies, the death is still diagnosed as cancer not death by cold. Why change the rules for this disease unless there is financial gain for the institution….
Reply
catattack999
| #
A Pentagon study published in the January 10, 2020, issue of the Vaccine journal, which found you’re 36% more likely to get coronavirus infection if you got the influenza vaccine in 2017 or 2018. Seqirus, the company that makes the vaccine, Flucelax, sold this vaccine to Italy, Germany, Spain, Uk and the USA. Would be very interesting to know the number of people who got this vaccine and also got covid19 from those that did not get the vaccine.
Reply
Christian Loosli
| #
I agree with you Charlie on this that the pusher on the building should be mentiond but, is he mentiond allways on the dead certificate in the past and by criminel cases? What we want to know how dangerous it is for the majority to walk on the building or a cliff. When the pusher selects only a certain very small % of sik or weak in immunity poeple to push, do we want to close down all buildings and cliffs worldwide just to save this population group, which is allready on the near end off the road? Every jear we see the pusher on his work since eons and by that we called often a natural dead but that changed suddenly with Cov 19. Why? How many people will additionally dy with that shut down? May be Billy has the anwer.
Reply
Dev
| #
If the cause of the 95-99 % of mortalities for C19 is a co-morbidity then treating the co-morbidity surely points to the solution.
Furthermore – Perhaps it might be useful to determine which countries have the smallest number of people with these conditions that are classified as co-morbidities and determine why this is so?
Reply