Stop scaring our kids to death with climate lies

As nearly every standardized test is showing, our schools are doing an abysmal job teaching kids how to read or do math. In some cases, kids graduating from high school can barely read their diplomas

But the schools are wildly succeeding with their climate change indoctrination program.

When I speak to kids on high school and college campuses and ask what the greatest threat is to their generation, the answer isn’t China’s aggression.

It isn’t a drug abuse problem that is becoming the leading killer of our children.

It isn’t the failed schools or the corrupt government or the more routine violations of freedom of speech.

It isn’t the $32 trillion national debt soon headed to $50 trillion. (I always remind the kids, “I won’t be paying for this Mount Everest-sized debt burden. YOU will.”) 

No, they almost all raise their hands and moan that they are most worried about global warming or ‘climate change’.

We are raising a generation with millions of Greta Thunbergs. A Daily Telegraph poll found that more than half of teenagers surveyed believe that the world “may end in their lifetime” because of ‘climate change’.

No one has ever told them that the climate has been changing for as long as the planet has existed. They’ve apparently never heard of the ice ages. The earth has gone through centuries of warming — and that was before air conditioning, which the climate czars want to take away from us to combat warming. Figure that one out.

I’m not here to argue about “the science” of global warming. What I do know is it’s only “settled science” because anyone who dares question the “experts” is written off as crazy or a quack.

Meanwhile, the people who warned us about “the population bomb,” nuclear winter, mass starvation, running out of energy, global cooling and a future so polluted that everyone would have to wear gas masks in cities are telling us to just trust them as they are busy at work erecting a multitrillion-dollar ‘climate change’ industrial complex that revolves around our planetary savior — the windmill.  

But scaring the bejesus out of our kids to score political points is a reprehensible practice.

Our school kids are being terrorized with misinformation. This, in turn, is leading to all sorts of maladies, including a rise in teen depression, suicide, lower productivity and drug addiction.  

Worst of all, we are seeing the opposite of a population bomb. We are experiencing one of the most severe birth dearths in American history. The birth rate is plummeting, and no surprise: Who wants to bring kids into a world that is claimed will be uninhabitable in 50 years?  

Psychologists are attributing these dysfunctions to a new syndrome called “eco-anxiety.” It’s a fear that Mother Earth is going to punish us in a brutal way — and very soon.  

The irony of all this is that today’s children and teens are inheriting a living standard, a cleaner planet, and a level of goods and services and technologies and medical care that is far superior to anything anyone in history — even the richest kings and queens — had access to even 100 years ago.

If kids think ‘climate change’ is worrisome, they should try dealing with the bubonic plague, which killed one-third of Europe’s population, or polio or tuberculosis — or fending off barbarians or working 60 hours a week in a coal mine.  

If my parents were part of the “greatest generation,” living through two world wars and a great depression, then this must be the psychotic generation. Are they to blame? No, we — their parents — are.

We are the ones who have passively sat by as those of a certain political leaning turned our kids into neurotic Green New Dealers.

Death to the machine. Turn the lights out. No more cars. No more flush toilets or washing machines. What’s next to save the planet? Euthanasia? 

That’s what happens when you teach your children that they aren’t inheriting the Earth but a fiery hell.

See more here nsjonline.com

Header image: On The Wight

About the author: Stephen Moore is a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation and a co-founder of the Committee to Unleash Prosperity. His latest book is “Govzilla: How the Relentless Growth of Government Is Devouring Our Economy.” 

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (1)

  • Avatar

    Dean Jackson

    |

    What is the basis, the foundation, of the “climate change” hoax? Calling it an obvious hoax won’t stop the agitation, nor identify the culprits spewing it. The foundation of the hoax is called “back radiation”, a non-existent law of physics, discovered by no one, and, naturally, devoid of awards, including the Nobel Prize in Science.

    Real, non-Marxist, science informs us that energy moves in the direction of least resistance,(1) which in this particular instance is long-wave infrared radiation being emitted from the cooling nighttime surface, then absorbed by certain molecules in the atmosphere, whereupon some of that radiation is emitted back downwards in the direction of GREATEST resistance in order to re-heat the surface. Got that? Very simple. Now get this shocker…the above was for night cooling of the surface, but during daytime “back radiation” is missing from the INCOMING radiation, all of which, when absorbed by molecules in the atmosphere,(2) is emitted upwards, out into space. Oops!

    Another shocker…when one analyzes the Earth’s

    Energy Budget graph, the numbers self-identify the fraud of “climate change”. Incoming radiation during the day accounts for 30% (24 energy units + 5 energy units: https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/atmosphere/energy ) of the energy absorbed by the surface, while during nighttime, we’re told that “back radiation”(3) accounts for 70% (98 energy units) of the energy absorbed by the surface! Get it? The daytime warms more with vastly less energy, while the night cools with vastly more energy!

    (1) Unless pushed in the direction of greater resistance by another source.

    (2) The incoming radiation absorbed by the atmosphere is UV radiation, and near-infrared radiation.

    (3) “Back radiation” takes place at nighttime, when the surface cools, emitting long-wave infrared radiation into the atmosphere.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via