Stay Away From The Vaxxed, It Is Official, From Pfizer’s Own Docs
The elite have already effed off to their hideouts, they have released the genocide. Read it and weep. We are effed. Pfizer’s own documents state both inhalation and skin contact will transmit whatever is in the vax from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated.
Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:
- If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.
-
If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.
This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”
TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.
THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.
Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.
Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.
Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:
Terms:
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?
That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy).
* If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.
* If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome.
The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported).
Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows:
* Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;
* Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays).
In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.
8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.
The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.
Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE.
The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.
I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:
An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.
My comment: This is why we have green screen Biden. They are ALL green screen now, we just caught Biden. They are green screen and working from sets because they have opened pandora’s box and intend to hide out until everything is finished. This is why many people are claiming the white house is empty and that they are working from a set ad are not actually there. Because they are not there. If they do ever go on camera, they are not where they say they are.
See more here: beforeitsnews.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Mark Tapley
| #
The mRNA-DNA chemotherapy injections are a biological weapon used by the Zionist syndicate elite against the world population. The long planned fake virus, fake test and fake numbers are the culmination of over a hundred years of vaccine warfare against humanity.
The elite’s goal is to debilitate, sterilize and depopulate the livestock as they are herded into the U.N’s Neo feudal tyranny of enforced austerity and deprivation of Agenda 2030-21.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9xbdUeP4p8jN/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oqt2bjOPB5co/
Reply
very old white guy
| #
Mark, you have to stop with the Zionist stuff as China is not Zionist.
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Greetings Old Guy:
The Chinese communists are an integral part of the Zionist network. Remember that there must always be an external enemy and the favorite tactic of the Zionists is the Hegelian Dialectic thesis antithesis. The present fake virus is indeed a psychological version. I will give a very condensed synopsis but I refer you to Hoover Inst. researcher Anthony Sutton. Also a good source is James Perloff and the book “How the Far East Was lost” by Kubek.
As I have detailed Russia was a wholly Zionist Jew enterprise that required constant and massive agricultural, industrial and financial aid. from beginning to end from the U.S. This was the long used eastern kingdom. The Soviet Union was flipped around and used again in the thesis antithesis for the Cold War until the present “War On Terror” for the Yinnon Plan and Greater Israel. Both China and Russia will be used as controlled opponents against the western powers by the Zionists in the coming world war that is being prepared now.
In the 1930’s the Japanese were in Asia as were the Germans in Europe an impediment to the Zionist agenda and expansion. The Japanese had been intricacy involved in Manchuria for well over 50 years, The communists (Zionists) could not establish Mao (trained in the USSR and guided by several Zionist Jews) until the Japanese were moved out of the way. That is the reason for the long planned White elephant setup at Pearl Harbor and Roosenvelts ten point strategy guided by the old Wilson handler Bernard Baruch. The Zionists torpedoed Chang Kai Chek as they had the White Russians in the eight year war against the Russian people beginning in 1917. The contrived Korean campaign also fits in here but I will skip it for now.
From the time the incredibly backward Chinese began to receive massive technological aid during the Nixon (Kissinger) administration until now, U.S. corporations are doing everything possible to get the Chinese Naval forces up to speed. The Russians are also getting ready. During Mao’s Great Leap Forward it is estimated that ap. 60 million Chinese peasants were starved. After Mao’s death there was a power struggle and a kakistocracy of 8 thugs came to power. The descendants of this criminal network are the predominant economic and political force in China today. Read “The Private Life od Chairman Mao” by his personal physician for over 20 years.
Reply
Dev
| #
All very well, but is this really a cover story for 5G and chemical onslaught.
Mental acrobatics will drive you mad whereas the obvious may save you!
Reply
Wisenox
| #
I just saw this article about a covid vascular study:
“In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease”
This is what the vaccine causes the cells to produce, right?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-illness/5744353
Reply
Mark Tapley
| #
Hello Wisenox:
They can’t even prove the existence of viruses. They cannot present a real purified, isolated or verified sample of the alleged pathogen. They have not ever shown that pathogens can be transmitted much less the non existent viruses. This indicates to me that all of it is a scam (as usual) to push the hyped up blood poisons and promote more of the allopathic big Pharma fraud. Kind of like those ass tronauts in the video you posted.
Reply
Wisenox
| #
What did you think of the ISS stuff? Crazy.
Reply
MarkTapley
| #
Greetings Wisenox:
Very good demonstration of how everything our Zionist controlled government does is a lie and a fraud. When you think about the incredible amount of wealth stolen by the insiders in the so called Defense related sector, including over 900 bases and massive land and naval forces, and a myriad of government programs that produce no real wealth but only redistribute the productive wealth of society it is amazing.
Not only from the fiat banking cartel’s insidious hidden tax of constant and accelerating monetary depreciation but if we take just the welfare programs beginning with Zionist LBJ;’s (both mother and grandmother were Jews) Great Society programs from the start in the 60’s until now we are looking at the redistribution, taxation, theft of ap. 15 Trillion dollars. There is no telling where this country would be today or how much better off the great number of people would be if we had maintained our limited Republic of sovereign states, rather than becoming a European “democracy” which as the great literary figure Ezra Pound called it “a country run by Jews.”
Reply
Tom
| #
To hell with Pfizer. According to these documents and the assessments of many doctors, if Pfizer knew ahead of time that these mRNA injections were going to lead to these kind of reactions, why did the FDA and CDC allow the usage of these poisons? The above article is a bit unnerving and difficult to fully understand…by that is by design as big pharma is immune from ever telling the truth.
Trying to avoid those that have had these poisons is going to be difficult. If indeed the mRNA spike proteins are going to keep multiplying within a body, surely at some point they will be emitted or shedded. There is no way pharma or anyone else is going to be able to control this.
Reply
very old white guy
| #
Fully half my family has taken the shot and I could not even get the fools to read a damn bit of anything scientific about what was happening. You are right Tom, it will be impossible to avoid these people and then they will be saying you are then problem without any logic or science to back them up.
Reply
Barbara
| #
Tom, you asked why the FDA and CDC allowed the use of these poisons? Because 50% of FDA’s budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry. Their budget comes from the very industry they’re supposed to be regulating and approving. CDC owns about 58 patents. Over 4 billion dollars a year from their annual budget of 11.5 billion buys vaccines from Pfizer, Merck, and Sofie, to name a few. They all have skin in the game.
Reply
Doug Harrison
| #
When you want to defeat an enemy that outnumbers you by millions to one, then you have to create division amongst that enemy and it appears to me that this is a classic case of just that; ie get them afraid of each other and then encourage them to attack each other. I would say that there may be a grain of truth in this Pfizer report but most of it has the aim of exacerbating the fear already apparent in the population.
Reply
Advocatus Diaboli
| #
It was actually a relief to read the Pfizer PDF.
I am outraged by the wholesale human-rights violations involved in mass house arrest (lockdowns), mandatory mask wearing, and enforced social distancing. They can stick their “vaccine passports” where the sun don’t shine. Also, isn’t it curious that the people who were complaining the loudest about Trump supposedly being a “dictator” and a “threat to democracy,” are by and large the same people who are defending Covidian rule by decree. So much for democracy.
And I retain an open mind regarding the risks of Covid-19 vaccines.
But reading this Pfizer document, it’s clear that this is a clinical trial protocol. In clinical trials, it is prudent to monitor and follow up every event that might have some connection to the drug being tested, and this includes those who come into contact with the people who are participating in the trial. It’s only a precaution, it does NOT mean that it’s already known to be dangerous to stand next to somebody who got the Pfizer shot. That’s actually what they’re trying to find out by using this protocol: the data it yields is used to determine if patterns of adverse events end up being different from (greater than) those experienced by the general population, in which case there could indeed be cause for concern.
Reply
Jerr
| #
If viral or antigen sloughing occurs as this article suggests and it causes an immune response and/or harm to an individual who is unvaccinated and did not agree to be vaccinated, there may be a legal argument to be made that the manufacturers vaccine immunity does not apply to that individual. The manufacturer has an implicit responsibility to warn and provide a cure to protect such persons, one would think. I’m haven’t heard of any provision in the vaccine immunity statues that provides legal protection to vaccine manufacturers if they harm persons not taking their vaccine but are harmed by its distribution. May be children of pregnant women are covered I don’t know. Someone with vaccine ligitation experience needs to provide an article on what the immunity limits are to manufacturers because of adverse effects of their vaccine on innocent unvaccinated individuals. I wouldn’t think manufacturers could pass that off to vaccine receiptents their requirements to warn and cure. I would be surprised if the Congress ever thought the FDA would approve a vaccine even on an emergency basis that could transmit adverse health effects to the general population. Isn’t the transmission of adverse health effects by a biologically based agent called a disease?
Reply
Syrius33
| #
Ahora entiendo algo muy extraño que me pasó el mes pasado. Fui a control médico luego de año y medio, presencial. La médica que me examinó había sido vacunada hacía tres días. Mientras me hacía la revisión física, sin guantes, empecé a sentir una sensación de leve mareo y dolor de cabeza.
No sufro hipertensión, pero cuando me tomó la tensión, la tenía en 150/65, en dos veces. Llegué con indisposición y fatiga a la casa y empecé controles de presión arterial, que oscilaba permanentemente y empecé a saturar 92-93%, con arritmia cardiaca.
Pensando que era estrés, empecé a nadar y a hacer ejercicio, con desaparición de los síntomas hace una semana. Pero me llamó mucho la atención porque fue algo realmente raro, sentí que fue algo que me pasó en la consulta porque hasta ese momento me sentía perfectamente bien.
Reply