Stay Away From New RSV, FLU, and Covid Shots & refuse masking

Written by Brucha Weisberger on September 19, 2023. Posted in Current News

The directives emanating from “experts” now are beyond shocking

Having abandoned all pretense of “following science” and being “evidence-based,” health officials and media are making a major propaganda push for people to get THREE jabs this fall: a brand new covid shot (which has not gone through any reported trials for safety or efficacy at all), the latest flu shot, and the newly unveiled RSV vaccine, which comes with very concerning safety data from the trials.

(Six people in the RSV vaccine trial group developed Guilliane Barre syndrome or other neurological complications, compared to zero in the placebo group – but the “numbers are too small to draw any conclusions,” so they’ll be trying it out on the population to find out for sure whether it really causes these devastating problems. For pregnant women, there was a significant increase in premature births and neonatal deaths among those who received the RSV shots in the trials – see details in my August article linked below.)

Along with these shocking recommendations for the individually dangerous vaccines, we are being told that while there is no data on the safety of getting the RSV shot TOGETHER with the covid and flu vaccines – “some experts” advise that vulnerable individuals should GET ALL THREE IN ONE VISIT, while the CDC and FDA monitor for problems.

In other words, people are being told with a straight face to go and be part of a population-wide experiment.

In the New York Times’ “Three Shots For Fall” article on Wednesday September 6, those were actually the recommendations made by “experts.” I’ll bring the quotes from that article later on.

Let’s first go through each of these shots one by one and explain the risks and the lack of benefits.

RSV

I wrote recently about the worryingly dangerous new RSV jabs that are coming out, (there are three: a Pfizer vaccine for pregnant women and seniors, a GSK vaccine for seniors, and an Astra Zeneca monoclonal antibody shot for babies), but now I have even more, very powerful information to provide.

First, here is my August article, for those who missed it:

RSV shots have until now been the epitome of a failed vaccine, with a negative efficacy (the shots made things worse when people were exposed to the illness), causing ADE and death in trials. There is not enough reason to believe things will now be rosy.

What is ADE? This article from CHOP explains the basic idea, while also being very obfuscating and tricky (how would “breakthrough disease” be distinguished from ADE?)

See these articles explaining how the original RSV shots caused worsened disease and death, and how unsure scientists are about the new “fix:”

Further:

And:

“Some comfort level that the vaccine is safe.” How is some comfort level good enough, when playing with lives?

Look how little a key scientist involved in the RSV vaccine development, Barney Graham, actually understands about antibody dependent enhancement (ADE.) This is from his November 2022 interview with Science.

And see the huge financial conflicts of interest Graham has:

Indeed, Barney Graham worked under Anthony Fauci at the NIAID beginning in 2000, and stands to personally earn $150,000 yearly in royalties on the new RSV vaccine.

Here is his name on the patent (slide from Dr. Meryl Nass MD.)

Look at the death that a different vaccine associated with ADE, the dengue vaccine, wrought when it was administered to the population without enough knowledge of its safety:

Is RSV so dangerous that we need to be scrambling and giving the public vaccines without enough guarantee of their safety?

The prevailing knowledge in all my years of motherhood has always been that RSV is only potentially dangerous to premature babies, and is nothing more than a cold for everyone else.

It is certainly strange that as RSV shots were in trial, we were swept with an RSV “epidemic” in babies the last two winters. Although many babies got sick, thank G-d, I did not hear of any deaths in the community at all.

The CDC collects the death certificate data. Here is the 2021 article they published with twelve years worth of information.

Indeed, according to the gold standard data – the death certificates – only 26 babies under 1 year old die with RSV per year in the entire United States, and only 17 of those deaths are actually caused by RSV.

As Dr. Meryl Nass wrote:

“four million babies are born yearly in the US. 20,000 die in their first year. RSV kills 0.125 percent of them. It is way down the list of top causes of death.”

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db427.htm#section_5

Slides from Dr. Nass’s presentation last week:

Source: RSV: the disease, the monoclonals and the vaccines.

This is NOT a disease for which we should rationally be making a vaccine.

The idea that seniors need RSV shots is ridiculous. RSV never has been a significant threat to the elderly population – despite the current false propaganda claiming it is.

This is taken from a long document with a lot more images. Read the rest here substack.com

Some bold emphasis added

Header image: Getty Images

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.