Sean Plunket-Steve Kirsch $1M debate to determine truth or lies

1. Teams A (misinformation spreaders) and B (narrative pushers) will each deposit $1M (or whatever amount is mutually agreed) in cash into an escrow held by a third party law firm that is engaged by both team. The $2M “pot” is reduced by the expenses incurred.
2. The contest issues will be determined by a panel of 40 judges. There are up to 20 issues that will be decided in up to 20 separate votes. To win on an issue, you must have 25 or more votes on that issue; otherwise the question is a draw.
3. The pot is allocated to the parties based on the results of each vote. So if Party A wins 3 issues, Party B wins 5 issues, and the other 12 are draws, then the “pot” will be split in the ratio of 9:11 (i.e., 3+6 : 5+6).
4. The judges will be selected at random by a mutually agreeable market research firm from the public at large by asking the question: have you been vaccinated. The firm will randomly select 40 neutral people who have consented to come to a central auditorium to view the 2 hour event on a livestream and vote after each issue is discussed based on who had the most persuasive argument. Ideally, the firm assesses each person’s confidence in the vaccine and selects people who are relatively neutral in aggregate.
5. The moderator will announce the judges vote on each issue after the time expires on that issue.
6. Team A will submit a list of 80 or more debate topics. Team B will have 15 days to let Team A know which questions they would like to debate; a list between 10 to 20 questions long. Clearly, Team B will pick the questions for which they think they have the best case of winning. It’s structured this way so that if Team A wins all the question, we can logically infer that Team A would have won on all the others issues as well, had they gone to a full debate.
7. Once the questions are selected, each team will have 15 days to create what slides they will use for each question and give those slides to the other Team to review. Each team will have 10 days to review the slides before the debate. Teams can have up to 3 slides per debate topic and all slides will be made publicly available.
8. At the end of the review period, the teams will submit the names of their team members to the moderator plus up to two alternates in the event that 1 or more team members is not available. If a team submits no team members, that team will forfeit on all the questions.
9. Each team will consist of up to 5 members.
10. The moderator will read the questions and enforce the rules. So the questions and team members are submitted to the moderator. If anyone breaks the rules, the moderator may have them removed from the event.
11. The moderator will be someone who is mutually agreeable to both parties.
12. The debate will be all virtual to make it easier on the team members to attend and schedule. This also minimizes expenses and allows each team to recruit the best possible players on each side.
13. The debate will be livestreamed to a worldwide audience.
14. Each side will be allotted a total of 3 minutes of total talk time on each topic. They can yield the floor at any time for the other side to respond.
15. When a team has the floor, the opposing team cannot interrupt them. A team can only speak when the moderator hands over the floor to them and should signify to the moderator when they are done speaking.
16. No ad hominem attacks. All team members are expected to remain respectful and polite.
17. The minimum talk time for each side is 15 seconds. If they use less than 30 seconds, they will be assessed as if they had spoken for 15 seconds. This is to ensure that the teams don’t just keep yielding each time (playing a game of “hot potato”).
18. The debate will be in a single 2 hour session. It will be publicly recorded.
19. The questions will be asked in the order presented by each team.
20. A coin toss by the moderator will determine which team starts. The moderator will read the question from the winning team and the opposing team will have the floor to answer.
21. The moderator will schedule a mock practice session to ensure both teams are familiar with the rules and resolve any ambiguities.
22. The terms in this offer are open to negotiation. All negotiation sessions shall be done in a recorded Zoom call between the parties that is live-streamed and made publicly available. The moderator will moderate these negotiation sessions. Any proposed modification must be party-neutral, i.e., cannot give either side an advantage.

I’m open to other options for any of the terms listed above so long as they are fair.

What will Sean do?

Summary

If he backs out now, it looks bad… really bad because he’s already accepted. There is now no way to back out without it being interpreted as a tacit admission that I’m right and he’s wrong.

So there is no way out. I think the “rock” option in the poll above is starting to look pretty good.

At the time this is being written, more than half of my readers think Sean will take that option.

See more here substack.com

Header image: Call Center Helper

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.