‘Scientist’ Claims There Were No Moon Landings
Ferdinand Santos, a scientist with a background in physics and IT, laid into space exploration and the Apollo missions so hard that Neil Armstrong thought he was back in flight school
Ferdinand Santos isn’t his real name, for privacy reasons.
He argues that many historical space events, like the moon landing and Space X launching a car into space, were staged and questions the authenticity of the evidence presented.
Ferdinand adds that the technology and logistics claimed by NASA don’t add up, and uses probability theory to debunk pretty much all of it.
If people want to believe it, that’s entirely their affair, but I know we didn’t go to the Moon. — Marcus Allen, publisher of Nexus magazine
He also discusses his views on scientism, suggesting that much of what is accepted as science is driven by philosophical rather than empirical evidence.
Ferdinand is critical of mainstream narratives and encourages critical thinking to question established beliefs.
He asked why people believe the American or Soviet governments.
The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission. — Gene Kranz, Apollo flight director
Ferdinand absolutely butchered the official narrative, in this episode for my UK Column show.
The audio episode is available on most podcast apps.
Talking points
- Apollo missions versus scientism.
- CIA’s involvement in NASA raises suspicion.
- Pilot training at the time was inadequate.
- Gagarin was used as Soviet propaganda tool.
If you look at the lunar module… there’s no flame, there’s no hole, there’s no debris, and there’s no noise. — Ferdinand Santos
See more here jermwarfare.com
Editor’s note: PSI does not necessarily endorse the views of each and every article we publish. Our intention is to encourage open, honest, scientific debate. The fact that the at least one of the Apollo descent stages and some of the hardware left behind are visible through telescope imaging seems to have escaped the author.
jchr12
| #
Please keep to science, not conspiracies.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
I do not subscribe to the author’s views at all, which is why I added the editor’s note at the bottom of the article.
Reply
Tom
| #
I can trump that. Man claims there are no scientists.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Editors,
“Ferdinand Santos isn’t his real name, for privacy reasons” If a person is not BRAVE ENOUGH to take responsibility for what he/she writes it should no be printed here at PSI. If an article has multiple authors each should be named. And If there is dis-agreement between authors that should be disclosed.
And what is it that I need to pay $100 dollars to have an article published here. Limit the length of article to save money.
Have a good dy
Reply
Orlandobass
| #
I’ve heard the “the computers of the 60’s didn’t have the processing power to get us to the moon”. Well, Roman engineers didn’t have computers, AutoCAD, or even slide rules but they built aquaducts that are still standing and in use after more than two thousand years. Same with the Coliseum, the Greek Parthenon and Acropolis.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
You’re absolutely right about the Greeks and the Romans, and I’ve heard that about the Apollo computers too, but they didn’t need to have massive processing power, they didn’t deal with files or images, they were essentially big calculators, and as such were perfectly suited for the jobs they had to perform.
Reply
John V
| #
For any of the people that actually post that it was said that NASA did not have the computing power to get a ship on the moon, they are taking their comments out of context. They definitely had enough computing power and comparing it to today’s cell phones or laptops or even a multifunction watch is basically what they were doing. They had the power, it was just slower and very limited on what they could do, so when they programmed it they had to be very efficient and only programmed what was needed to complete the mission. There is a great book by Don Eyles documenting the programming and computers of Apollo.
Reply