Replacing coal with wind and solar requires massive storage
In a summary of a recent peer-reviewed paper, the principal author stated that an electric grid predominantly powered by intermittent ‘renewables’ such as wind and solar would require storage approximately equal to 25 percent of annual generation to be reliable. Other studies have reported similar results
US coal powerplants produced approximately 700,000 GWH of electricity in 2023. The Administration has announced a goal of eliminating coal generation by 2030.
Achieving this goal would require installation of approximately 270 GW of wind and solar rating plate capacity generation, depending on the percentages of wind and solar generation.
Based on the Fekete paper, the US would also require a total of approximately 175,000 GWH of additional electricity storage as the result of the elimination of coal power plants.
The primary battery storage system currently being installed for grid level storage is the Tesla Megapack, which stores 19.3 MWH deliverable at a rate of 4.9 MW over a 4-hour period.
Utilizing Tesla Megapacks to support the intermittent wind and solar generation installed to replace US coal powerplants would require 9,067,357 (over nine million) units at a current installed cost of $8,128,870 per unit, for a total installed cost of $74 trillion.
Research suggests that battery life can be extended by operating the batteries between 20 and 80 percent of full charge. Grid scale batteries would be expected to operate below 20 percent of full charge very rarely, so the lower limit can essentially be ignored.
However, limiting the batteries to a maximum charge of 80 percent, while maintaining necessary electricity storage would require increasing the installed battery capacity by 25 percent, at an installed cost of approximately $18 trillion, increasing the total battery system installed cost to approximately $92 trillion.
(Note: These costs do not include the land required for installation or the cost of grid connection.)
The US currently has an electricity storage deficit of approximately 140,000 GWH. ‘Fossil fueled’ generation currently provides support for the existing wind and solar generation in the absence of this storage and there is growing concern regarding grid capacity margins during peak demand periods.
Therefore, as coal powerplants are decommissioned, it would be essential that the current storage deficit be eliminated as well as installing the additional storage required to support the intermittent generating capacity which would provide the generation previously provided by the coal powerplants.
This would require the installation of approximately 18 million Tesla Megapacks (or equivalent). Currently, production capacity does not exist to meet this demand over the next six years.
Also, as coal power plants are decommissioned, there will be a growing need for long-duration storage to support the grid through seasonal variation in both wind and solar generation.
The only current long-duration systems are pumped hydro facilities.
However, it is unlikely that significant additional pumped hydro capacity will be installed in the US because of geographic limitations and (some – Ed) public resistance.
See more here substack.com
Header image: Teslarati
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Alan
| #
There a more obvious way to run a reliable and cheaper grid system and that is build coal fired power stations like the Chinese.
Reply
Wisenox
| #
Solar owners are starting to become aware of the maintenance issues, and they can be costly.
Wait until the insurance premiums rise as well; they’re planning on adding insurance points because holes were put in the roofs and weakened it.
Reply
Carbon Bigfoot
| #
Unrealistic and unreliable. Intellectual energy masturbation to the max. Why do we allow this nonsense to be publish?
Reply