‘Renewable’ Energy Sources May Become Uninsurable
Last week, the Insurance Business website carried a piece about insurance companies musing that they may find themselves unable to insure so-called ‘renewable’ sources of electricity
Ignore the alarmist claptrap and concentrate on the insurance information:
Assets designed to help fight climate change may soon risk losing access to insurance unless they’re adequately shielded from extreme weather events.
Roughly 46 percent of Europe’s total renewable generation capacity will be at “critical risk” from the fallout of climate change unless owners do more to protect existing and planned assets, according to a report by Zurich Resilience Solutions, a unit of Zurich Insurance Group AG, and Mandala Partners. Energy storage and solar assets are particularly exposed, it said.
“If we don’t see a continued and increased focus on building resilience, it will be very difficult for us – or any other insurance company – to insure these assets in the future,” Sierra Signorelli, chief executive of commercial insurance at Zurich Insurance, said in an interview.
Zurich looked at 25,000 power-generation sites in the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain under a scenario of 2C of global warming. Without steps to boost resilience, Europe’s clean-energy assets will be relatively more exposed to extreme weather events than their fossil-fuel equivalents and may face as much as €270 billion (US$312 billion) in losses by 2050, according to Zurich.
Unaddressed, “physical climate risks will act as a brake on clean-energy investment at the scale and speed required,” the report said.
In the five countries included in the study, the share of energy produced by coal, oil and gas is set to fall to 17 percent in 2030 from an average 28 percent today, according to the Swiss insurer. By contrast, the share of renewables is set to increase to 67 percent in 2030 from 49 percent currently.
Among the concerns is that solar farms and wind installations often occupy a larger physical space than fossil-fuel plants, leaving a bigger surface area exposed to the elements. “Renewable-energy assets tend to be more susceptible to weather-related events,” said Signorelli.
Zurich Insurance says renewable-energy companies can stress-test their assets against different climate scenarios, use drones to monitor infrastructure weaknesses, and build buffer zones to protect against fire and flood. Solar farms can be built on stilts to protect against floods and the panels can be made more heat resistant to protect against overheating.
“There are always some assets that are difficult to insure,” Signorelli said. “But if there’s a willingness to engage, we try to provide some insurance and work toward providing greater coverage as we align on the risk.”
All very vague and full of uninformed speculation.
What is of far greater concern is the fact that if the UK did ‘achieve’ 67 percent ‘renewable’ energy by 2030, we would be suffering the first stages of electricity rationing, probably similar to that which we saw during the 1970s, and one recent report said that to get Britain to 100 percent ‘renewable’ energy by 2050 would require the country to bankrupt itself, and the population have to endure permanent 50 percent power cuts.
This will apparently help to ‘save the planet’, but will result in the deaths of thousands of people every winter who are unable to adequately heat their homes.
See more here insurancebusinessmag.com
Bold emphasis added
About the author: Andy Rowlands is a British university graduate in space science and Principia Scientific International researcher, writer and editor who co-edited the 2019 climate science book ‘The Sky Dragon Slayers: Victory Lap‘
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
We need to stop using that word “renewable” it is a lie.
Reply