Public Has Lost Trust in Institutions that Promote Covid Vaccination
I have always wondered how hard it would be for a research scientist or clinician-investigator to publish a paper concluding COVID-19 vaccination was unsafe when they took the jab, had their family vaccinated, pushed it on their patients, and worked in an environment where their job was dependent on compliance with a vaccine mandate.
Following this line, is it possible that that deep bias among these individuals drive them to find ways of working with data that lead to the false conclusion that ‘“vaccines are safe and effective?”
As a senior clinician, I think COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy must be one of the most egregious examples.
In this application, pregnant women would excluded from the original placebo-controlled RCTs because the products have a dangerous, genetic mechanism of action, long-term studies over many years would be required, and the pediatric outcomes would need tracking in order to determine if COVID-19 vaccination was “safe.”
So how do deceptive manuscripts actually get into print?
Ibroci et al used the Generation C Study, N=3157 but excluded 1,308 for many reasons including not knowing the vaccine status in 475. They whittled the sample of vaccinated mothers to 250 and compared them to 1,544 unvaccinated from an earlier time or received the vaccine after gestation.
There are no long term outcomes and no assurances of complete data capture. For example, if a mother had a stillbirth or died in a hospital outside the Mount Sinai System, then they would not be included in the 250.
You can easily see how selection bias could completely influence this small study and observe how the authors in the introduction and conclusions make the false claim vaccines are safe.
A bigger source of bias is probably the authors and institutions themselves, all of which almost certainly were vaccinated, pushed vaccines on their patients, and were under institutional mandates.
For example, both Mt Sinaii and the CDC (author Sascha Ellington) were actively pushing COVID-19 vaccination by the summer of 2021 before any conclusive safety information in pregnant women was available.
These institutions almost certainly would not approve a manuscript to be submitted if it concluded COVID-19 vaccination was unsafe.
So I took to social media to assess if the discerning public would see through this bias. Among respondents on Twitter (X), Gettr, and Truth Social, 98 percent said they would not trust the results from such a paper like Ibroci et al.
No wonder academic medicine is so at odds with the public on COVID-19 vaccine safety.
So next time you see news on a new vaccine study, take a look at the authors and institutions to get a sense of bias. Author vaccination status and institutional vaccine promotion and mandates should be disclosed.
Additionally, if authors or institutions have received federal funding for vaccination as an emergency counter-measure, it should be included in the conflicts of interest declaration.
One would need to note “independent practice” or an institute that did not mandate vaccination such as Brownstone Institute, Truth for Health Foundation, McCullough Foundation, etc., in order to have trust in the results.
See more here substack.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
I lost all trust in the medical community decades ago. The last 4 years of medical charades has only proven my decision has been fortuitous and life saving.
Reply
VOWG
| #
Tom, very few people think these days.
Reply
herb
| #
I never knew just how many people in the world are pure evil , our governments and the WEF have had zero issues with ending the lives of billions of people around the world for their own self interests .
Countless children and adults dead or will be in a few short years due to a slow acting lethal injection disguised as a vaccine.
What Dr. Paul Alexander Was Told Privately About the VVV’s in 2020
https://www.europereloaded.com/what-dr-paul-alexander-was-told-privately-about-the-vvvs/
Reply
Wisenox
| #
“vaccines are safe and effective”
There’s their favorite buzz phrase. You will often find the phrase prominently displayed with either highlighting, bold or quoted text.
Are they trying to seed your brain into thinking they are ‘safe and effective’, or seeding you to protest during the next round of fake viruses?
The phrase is obviously being used against you, that’s why it’s everywhere and prominent, so how are they using it on you? There’s a common source for most of it, the UN, but it really boils down to the people that control the UN.
The ‘next round’ should be coming up soon. We’ll probably get the expected banking ‘whistleblowers’ with this one. They put extra protections specifically for banking whistleblowers into law a few years ago, in preparation for the scripted banking crisis to come. It’s their ‘get out of jail free’ card.
They need a crisis of some kind to get the sheep moving in one direction, and they “need” an unruly public so they can establish an ‘us-against-them’ mentality with authorities.
Stay away from protests, there’s a very high likelihood that you get subverted.
Know the words, they like to use alternate definitions, and form your own opinions because that’s what adults do. It’s children and sheep that believe what their told.
Reply