Prince William Echoes The Great ‘Reset’ Pablum

Prince William has confirmed that he’s at least as dodgy a kingly prospect as his father the Prince of Wales by calling for a ‘Reset.’ William, who is second in line to the British throne, slipped the codeword into a video broadcast for the environmental charity Conservation International.

He said:

All of us, across all sectors of society, and in every corner of the globe must come together to fundamentally reset our relationship with nature and our trajectory as a species.’

Others have criticized William (currently worth an estimated £30 million, though due one day to inherit a fortune of at least £1.6 billion) for this ‘do as I say, rather than do as I do’ hypocrisy.

With his Range Rover and his air miles (some of them in private jets), William is hardly a role model for carbon parsimony, so why should we let him lecture us ordinary folk on how we should live our lives?

But for me, hypocrisy is the least of his sins. What should worry us far more is that sinister invocation of a word — ‘Reset’ — which is intimately bound with the New World Order proposed by Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum and its masterplan for a ‘sustainable’ society in which ‘you’ll own nothing and be happy.’

Here’s how the WEF put it in its now-infamous 2016 promo video:

Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city – or should I say, “our city”. I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes.

It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.

(Hmm. I wonder how William will feel when he suddenly he finds that he no longer owns, via the Crown Estate, his fine collection of royal properties including Sandringham, Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, and Balmoral, not to mention all the maritime rights which, outrageously, give him a cut of the offshore wind industry. Will he still ‘be happy’?)

Speeches like William’s Conservation International broadcast will scupper any hopes some of us may have had that he was not going to turn out like his eco-loon father the Prince of Wales.

It rehearses exactly the same hackneyed, green movement talking points that Charles has been droning on about for years – ten years to save the planet, irreversible damage, most vulnerable will suffer most, etc, plus a cheeky plug for the ‘remarkable’ Covid vaccine.

If William seriously cared about his future subjects, what he’d really be talking about is the disastrous consequences of the Boris Johnson regime’s Net-Zero policies which must surely impoverish, immiserate and enslave the British people by driving up energy prices to unaffordable levels and using environmentalism as an excuse to strip most of their remaining freedoms.

To see what Britain’s green future really looks like, have a glance at this University of Cambridge-published report produced by a group of academics led by Professor Julian Allwood, who set out to answer the question of how Britain might possibly reduce its industrial CO2 output to zero by 2050.

Unless you are a hair-shirt greenie, the answer is truly horrifying.

Do read it yourself, but as Clive Best notes in his summary:

I am sure that if the UK public were made aware of all that is planned for their future there would be a public uproar.

  • No Flying after 2030 (except VIPs of course)
  • No gas central heating within ~12 years. Heat pumps only allowed and colder houses.
  • Only electric cars post 2030 and a 40% reduction in traffic.
  • Vegetarian only diet and no imported food.
  • The shutdown of international trade and reduction in living standards
  • International travel curbed except by train.

It’s hard to be sure of the degree to which future King William V is aware of the economic and social consequences of all this green nonsense he is blithely insisting that we ‘must’ adopt to save the planet.

You could argue that, like his Dad, he’s simply so out of touch with ordinary people’s lives and so epically thick that he’s just mouthing the green mantra because it feels right rather than because he genuinely wants us to become serfs of the coming trillionaire tech elite and their Malthusian dream of a depopulated world.

The apple does not fall far from the tree.

See more here: climatechangedispatch.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    Protestant

    |

    And way back in 2008, crazed scientists were already pointing out how much each human adds to “Global Warming” just by breathing out carbon dioxide. Yes, they want to kill more humans to “save the planet”. Or perhaps they plan to tax us for breathing. Will that be the excuse for continued mask-wearing, designing masks to “capture” each of our “dangerous exhalations”?

    https://www.globe.gov/explore-science/scientists-blog/archived-posts/sciblog/index.html_p=183.html

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Andy

      |

      There will probably be any number of such lunatic ideas.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Mark Tapley

    |

    All the Royal parasites must do their part to indoctrinate the masses with the Zionist rhetoric of climate change, green energy, the fake virus and the need to adjust to the U.N. bankers Sustainable Development Initiative Agenda 2030-21 of austerity and deprivation in the Neo-feudal global tyranny. I think these super Zionist Royal layabout hypocrites should set an example for the rest of us. They are just like the eugenicist fraud Bill Gates who preaches austerity while living in his 66,000 sq. ft. mansion and flying in his 900 gal. per. hr. Jet not including the rest of his fleet and his helicopters. You can bet that none of these shysters are on a vegan diet either. Andrew was probably not thinking much about that minuscule amount of critical Co2 when making all those junkets to Epstein’s N.Y. mansion or on his Lolita Express trips either. Royal business I’m sure. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Edward VII was so spendthrift that he owed large sums to his buddy Rothschild. This was long before the Mossad furnished Epstein and Ghisliane for all the big mucy muchs but Edward spent so much time in the Paris whore houses that they set up Royal accommodations for him.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/4M6xQpxZs7if/

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Saighdear

    |

    what worries me is the idea that we can’t now use certain words because they’re Hi-jacked. Jings, soon Yes & NO will mean something else ( does already for some )

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via