Population Control and the American Way of Life
And just like that, a new gene therapy-based birth control technology is born
Worldwide birthrate per 1000 people follows a very predictable trend.
In “developed” and/or wealthy nations, the birthrate is low and in nations at the lower end of the economic development scale, the birthrate is high. Nothing new there.
Many countries, including the USA, have birthrates that either are too low to sustain current population levels or are stable.
Since 1970, the population of people born in the USA has been stable at below 300 million. In fact, some estimates show a decline in population.
All of the population growth in the USA during this time period has been due to immigration. That is why the USA has grown to 336 million people in 50 years. This trend has only increased in recent years.
There were a record 44.8 million immigrants living in the U.S. in 2018, making up 13.7 percent of the nation’s population.
This represents a more than fourfold increase since 1960, when 9.7 million immigrants lived in the U.S., accounting for 5.4% of the total U.S. population.
For Jill and I growing up in a blue state, we were indoctrinated at an early age by the public school system that having two children was the responsible thing to do to save the planet from overpopulation.
That careers were more important that having a large family.
That women would find more fulfillment in a education and career, as opposed to staying at home.
That women should defer motherhood until college and a career were firmed established.
That this was the responsible path to take.
Today, young women receive the same messaging from our government, our schools systems, and main stream corporate media.
This messaging by the US government is still as strident as when I was in my youth 50 to 60 years ago.
The truth is that UN’s Agenda 2030 asserts that migration is a human right. What this means in practicality is that persons born in countries with high birthrates have a right to migrate into wealthy countries with low birth rates.
To begin – migration is not a “human right.” Property laws and nation states exist for a reason. To assert otherwise is to assert that there is a one world government which is in control of migration. Another usurpation of authority by the UN and the WEF.
This nation’s rules and regulations, our very constitution do not apply to non-citizens. This is by design. Let’s abide by our Constitution and Bill or Rights, not UN agreements, such as Agenda 2030, which was signed by a US president and never ratified by the Senate.
Our country has done a fine job of convincing the American populace that large family size hurts families and individuals in aggregate.
We were told that the reward of that, for better or worse, would be a stabilized population over time and preservation of the American way of life, environment, cultural heritage and associated economic opportunities for US Citizens.
And yet still they persist.
This week, Kamala Harris specifically stated that a reduced population was key to children being able to breath and drink clean water. This is not the first time she has asserted this false narrative.
Yet, the Biden border crisis grows ever more urgent and the rate of illegal immigration continues to surge. It is a no brainer to think that an option to reduce population might be as simple as reducing immigration, if that was their true intent.
The truth is that the USA has a vibrant and amazing culture. A heritage built on independence, free speech, shared values and strong work ethic. This heritage can easily be diluted by too much immigration.
Just look to what is happening France right now. Open migration policies have worked to cause a vast instability within the nation.
France literally can no longer integrate so many people, with such different sets of cultural norms into their core national culture. This is not progress.
Under globalism, the heterogeneous cultures through out the world are being weaponized as a way to destroy diversity; a path towards enabling a single, globalized government controlled by the UN and the WEF.
Which is precisely what open borders, the immigration policies of the UN and even Kamala Harris’ statements seem to be working towards. It is time to end this nonsense and get back to a closed and orderly immigration system.
There are over eight billion people in the world. The USA can not take all those that wish to immigrate. To think otherwise is foolish.
See more here substack.com
Bold emphasis added
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Koen Vogel
| #
I think your ontological shock model might work here. On one hand, a shrinking population is unsustainable. Many of our “entitlements” such as pensions and health care depend on young healthy people financing old and infirm people. But politicians are loathe to tell voters that the entitlements they’ve worked their butts off to achieve are now a thing of the path: this is the path to not being re-elected. So they pretend that all is well, and import masses of cheap labor that will pay for the entitlements. Kicking the ball forward works until it doesn’t.
Reply