Planetary Solar Rotation
Some additional thoughts and further explanations are added to the original text.
This text mainly explains the physical mechanisms required to launch satellite bodies from their host planets.
The major focus is on the Moon separating from planet Earth.
A protoplanet does not have any significant component of solar (axial) rotation as it condensed through electrostatic attraction from an orbiting dust cloud in tidal lock with the Sun, as shown in Exhibit 1 – Electrostatic Assembly of Proto-clouds.
Note planets are defined as worlds capable of launching satellites, and does not include those worlds which appear to be the result of launch action from another planet. The solar system consists of original planets Venus, Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
Exhibit 1 https://www.bosmin.com/PSL/Exhibit1.jpg
The direction of rotation throughout the Solar System is usually the same as the sidereal motion (posigrade). This strongly suggests the mechanism for initiating solar rotation is a common phenomenon. Subsequently sufficient mass accumulates to gravitate the mass into a cold hard spherical proto planet in tidal lock with the Sun, as shown in Exhibit 2 – Spherical Proto-Planet:
Exhibit 2 https://www.bosmin.com/PSL/Exhibit2.jpg
This included some radioactive minerals which reacted to start forming a heated core. Eventually, the developing hot spot forms a weakened planet face which explodes to form a new satellite which can orbit the planet or the Sun. Other orbiting options are discussed in the PLS text.
At the point of initial eruption, the gas jet force reacts on the surface of the planet as shown in Exhibit 3 – Common Solar and Satellite Rotation Initiation: Earth – Moon example. Simultaneously, the sidereal orbit of the planet moves the centre of centrifugal attraction (planet’s centre-of-gravity) ahead of the jet force action.
This establishes a turning couple comprising the jet stream reaction with the centrifugal force. Turning couple forces cause planets to accelerate on their axes, developing solar angular velocity, or axial rotation.
The reaction to the jet stream force also causes the planet to move into a higher elliptical orbit around the Sun.
Exhibit 3 https://www.bosmin.com/PSL/Exhibit3.jpg
The Earth – Moon system can be checked for discharge velocity and angular momentum. Earth has slowed since the initial spin sequence, as evidenced from coral core information.
This maybe due to friction loss and/or due to an expanding Earth. The Moon’s orbit has also moved further away from Earth which is consistent with friction loss due to tidal interaction.
Exhibit 5 https://www.bosmin.com/PSL/Exhibit5.jpg
If the Moon had travelled further than 250,000 km from Earth in the direction of the Sun, it would have gone into a solar orbit. This velocity had no tangential component to the planet, and could have resulted in the Moon crashing back to Earth.
However, by the time the Moon returned to the Earth’s previous location – under Earth’s gravitational influence, the Earth had accelerated into a faster and higher ellipsoid, sidereal path illustrated in Exhibit 7 – Moon returns to pass below Earth’s location and Mercury launches into lower solar orbit.
This impetus to the Earth was due to the escaping volatile jet. The Moon therefore missed hitting the Earth as momentum was developed in travelling to the Earth’s initial position. The Moon passed behind the Earth and developed a lunar orbit. This initiated the Moon’s posigrade rotation around Earth that has continued ever since.
Exhibit 7 https://www.bosmin.com/PSL/Exhibit7.jpg
Mercury launched as shown in Exhibit 7 with escape velocity between 11.18 and 18.25 km/sec.
Mercury’s orbital anomaly is further discussed at:[4] Coral-core records[5] suggest there were 410 days per year in the Devonian period of the Paleozoic (230-620 million years ago). This implies the Earth initially (4.5 B.y.) spun at speeds somewhere between 690 and 1,931 days per year when the Moon originally launched.
Thus, the vast majority of the angular momentum present in the Earth during Archean times, developed from escaping volatiles reacting against the centrifugal force of the Sun. This is evident, because energy provided to the Earth is much larger than that provided to the Moon.
It is noted that larger planets with more radioactive material would produce a much greater explosive satellite launch force, lasting longer and leaving more evidence of thermal release. Such a violent discharge of material (Eye Stage) produces many small projectiles besides the main satellite body.
Some fragments of crust and cooled magma, also orbit the planet. Over time the orbits decay, showering the planet surface with a rain of meteorites.
References
1. https://www.bosmin.com/PSL/PlanetarySolarRotation.pdf
2. http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/PlanetsSatellitesLandforms.pdf
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis
4. https://www.bosmin.com/PSL/NewtonAndMercury.pdf
Click to access NewtonAndMercury.pdf
5. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/02/fossilized-coral-calendar-changes-leap-day/471180/
See more here principia-scientific
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.Â
Trackback from your site.
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Robert,
What about binary asteroids? There is no weathering that would erase any evidence of an impact and yet the asteroid are smooth. Satellite occurs when object enters the energy field radiated by another object and equalizes with it.
Herb
Reply
Geraint HUghes
| #
The real question here is, was Earth formed in its present position? Given that its core is surrounded by liquid metallic hydrogen, yet the pressures and temperatures to form that material do not exist in the core, meaning therefore it can only have been created elsewhere. Which in turn then meant it must have itself been ejected from another source. (I.e. Saturn or Jupiter)
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Geraint,
Why do you consider it a given that the core is surrounded by liquid metallic hydrogen when you concede the conditions make that an impossibility?
Herb
Reply