Pill version of Covid-19 vaccine to start clinical trial in Israel

A capsule version of the Covid-19 vaccine could be a “game changer” in countries with a low immunization rate, its developer has said.

Jerusalem-based Oramed Pharmaceuticals has received approval from the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center to start a clinical trial on 24 unvaccinated volunteers for a single-dose capsule version of a vaccine that is being developed by Indian firm Premas Biotech.

Oramed announced in March that it had tested its pill on pigs and the animals had produced antibodies after being administered it.

The company, which specializes in creating oral versions of drugs that are usually administered via an injection, is also currently conducting trials for its oral insulin capsule to treat type-2 diabetes.

Oramed CEO Nadav Kidron told the Times of Israel the trial for the Covid vaccine pill is expected to start next month, once it gains the final approval from the Health Ministry.

He said the capsule could be used as a booster against the more contagious Delta variant.

“Our oral vaccine, which doesn’t rely on a deep-freeze supply chain unlike other coronavirus vaccines, could mean all the difference between a country being able to emerge from the pandemic or not,” Kidron said, adding that an oral vaccine could be a “game changer” in counties with a low vaccination rate.

See more here: rt.com

Header image: Steve Buissinne/Pixabay

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    itsme

    |

    probably vitaim D tablets

    Reply

  • Avatar

    itsme

    |

    Vitamin D
    ;-()

    Reply

    • Avatar

      sir_isO

      |

      Well yeah, vitamin D function is important and quite implicated.

      But I’m also sure you know it’s a bit more than just that. And unfortunately, physics dictate that you cannot address individual health status with generalizations.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        sir_isO

        |

        “And unfortunately, physics dictate that you cannot address individual health status with generalizations.”

        If you don’t quite get that, that’s ASIDE from those current generalizations, which preventatively, are supposed to help against results from future deficiency and toxicity…by using more toxicity and not addressing any part of the causation.

        So, even conceptually, if you try peddle a generalized “vaccine” composed of toxins to me, which does not aid my health in any way and is actually designed to degenerate me, you’re going to be quite unhappy about what that does to your existential health.

        Even the idea of vaccination is fallacious. You have to abandon physics to inherit that methodology. I can’t do that.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          sir_isO

          |

          I guess when you ignore the obvious, subtleties overwhelmingly evade consideration too.

          The CDC’s mask guidance gives vaccines a better fighting chance:
          https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/07/cdc-coronavirus-masks-vaccines-indoors/619592/

          Now before I even refer to anything else there. What does that mean, and why does it exclude the concept of improving your health?

          So I was thinking, what do masks and vaccines actually do, what are they?

          And it was like “Well masks worsen my breathing and makes me more susceptible to infections while having no quantifiable benefits with respect to the supposed problem”

          But also “And vaccines are to hijack my body to continually, unnecessarily produce toxic crap that it wouldn’t have, based on huge amounts of fraud”.

          So when Ms C(D)CP says..

          “Vaccines Are Great. Masks Make Them Even Better.
          Why not both?”

          You must understand, she is being BRUTALLY honest.

          For instance, since I can relate to whatever, as an insecure psycho/sociopath, for instance, who has a lot of enemies known as “citizens” because I suck at the cock of mammon…obviously, considering masks do damage, and vaccine do damage, and both are based on fraudulent suggestions, both are unnecessary, as well as including say, industrial profiteering…if you combine both, they are stronger.

          Functionally, both of those factors are clearly implicated in damage, so if you compound that damage, OBVIOUSLY masks make vaccines better makes ivermectin better makes EMF better makes IBM rich.

          Reply

          • Avatar

            sir_isO

            |

            Subtleties like…
            The Center for Disease Cotnrol and Prevention

            Except, it’s just The Center For Disease Control

            You know, in practice.

          • Avatar

            sir_isO

            |

            Remember at the start of the year, just after many elderly had already been sacrificed throughout that year in the UK…when they introduced vaccines?

            So stats were like “Old people are dying a lot suddenly…”

            Iirc, rather many of those elderly died after being vaccinated at nursing homes and were never hospitalized…many of them who may have needed hospitalization for various reasons were also denied due to policies.

            But, in the media, happy go lucky euphemism was like “Covid vaccines reduces hospitalizations by 80%” or something.

            Yeah, that’s real simply, you kill 80% of potential patients, you have 80% potential patients.

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via