Pfizer Periodic Safety Update Report Confirms Batch Variability
As an epidemiologist I am in the business of determining scientific validity of published studies
The Schmeling analysis that demonstrated the batch or lots of Pfizer mRNA vaccines seemed to have very imbalanced side effect profiles was externally consistent with VAERS data presented by Senator Ron Johnson to the CDC.
This has been the major explanation of why some are fine and others are injured or dead after COVID-19 vaccination.
But, was there any confirmation of what Schmeling et al found?
In a reply to a letter to the editor, Schmeling et al reveal the Pfizer Periodic Safety Update as an source of internal validity.
“Finally, after publication of our report, we have become aware of the first Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) for the BNT162b2 vaccine covering the period 19 December, 2020 to 18 June 2021 that was submitted to the European Medicines Agency on 19 August 2021 by the market authorization holder (BioNTech).11
This PSUR appears to confirm a large variation in numbers of adverse events between different BNT162b2 batches and batches with the highest number of adverse events reported here were all those represented by the blue ‘high SAE’ trendline in the figure of our published study.”
So it appears as if the “hot lot” theory is confirmed.
This explains why some ~32 percent have virtually zero side effects and have little reason for concern.
We only wish everyone could be in that group.
All others have some reason for personal health vigilance for the emergency of vaccine-induced medical problems.
See more here substack.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Saeed Qureshi
| #
It appears Dr. McCullough is desperately trying to save the dying profession of the so-called “medical science.”
Unfortunately, it is too late; lies and fakeness of the profession as science are too obvious and have been exposed. Epidemiology would not help either, as it is dependent on monitoring the disease or the treatment, which is indirectly dependent on the TESTING.
In the case of the current issues of viruses, pandemics, and vaccines, they are all dependent on the testing, which is fake, so all analyses and conclusions, epidemiological or otherwise, about viruses and their treatments will be irrelevant or null and void.
@ “ … demonstrated the batch or lots of Pfizer mRNA vaccines …” batch analysis can only be established using laboratory testing by chemists, not hospital clinicians. However, as no valid tests are available, accurate and valid data is impossible to obtain, so does its interpretation. https://bioanalyticx.com/is-this-vax-really-adulterated/
Dr. McCullough should seek help from an experienced and knowledgeable expert in the testing area, preferably an analytical chemist.
Reply
Tom
| #
I would never believe anything fizer or big pharma says, for that matter. Their entire murdering drug empire is based on a mountain of lies.
Reply