Pennsylvania’s Coal Industry Crumbles As Plant Closures Mount
On March 22 at 7 a.m., Shawn Steffee stood on a hill overlooking the Homer City Generating Station with his family and the community he grew up with
They were all looking at Pennsylvania’s largest coal-fired power plant for the last time — the plant he and his father, uncles, brother, and the union he had guided had all worked at for decades.
Steffee, the business manager for Boilermakers Local No. 154, whose labor force was one of several at the plant, told the Washington Examiner the effect of the plant closure, announced two years ago, would be devastating not just to his union but to the community he grew up in.
“It is not just job losses; it is a major tax revenue loss for the school district that I grew up in, and now it will be gone,” Steffee said.
And then, by the morning of March 22, the tallest smokestack in the United States was gone.
The sound of the Unit 3 smokestack coming down was thunderous. The imagery was gutting; people in the community and anyone who recognized the 1,217-foot smokestacks as part of the local skyline for decades were reminded that an era had ended.
Steffee said it wasn’t easy watching it fall. “But I had to be there and see it,” he said flatly. The tower had stood there since 1977 and the plant since 1969.
This coal-fired power plant was the victim of politics, competition, and environmental regulations whose goalposts seemed to change daily. With all three putting so much pressure on the coal industry, operating and making a profit became untenable.
When it was fully operational, the 1,900-megawatt plant could power over two million homes and buildings.
There are rumors that a natural gas-fired power-generating facility to support an artificial intelligence data processing plant is in the works. If that all comes to pass, it would be the largest gas-fired power plant in the U.S. But no one has confirmed that just yet.
Pennsylvania State Sen. Joe Pittman hinted at that in a statement, saying while it was sad to see such a significant part of history fade into history books:
“it’s also very exciting that we have an opportunity to redevelop the site with economic opportunity while reinventing our future. We have a unique opportunity to see the site cleaned up and rebuilt with billions of dollars of private-sector investment,”
Those dollars, and the jobs associated with rebuilding and operating a future economic force in our community, provide hope for a new and vibrant future for the community, the school district, the county and the region.”
Steffee said he was also hopeful. But he kept everything else close to the vest.
In truth, both labor and the community have had their hopes dashed before.
Daniel Turner, executive director of Power the Future, said the demise of Homer City meant that enormous electricity capacity would be lost forever. The people of Pennsylvania, he believes, will only be worse off as a result:
“Nothing can replace this, not wind, not solar, and the green activists responsible for such terrible decisions will move on to their next victim.”
Turner says it is pure un-American insanity to shut down responsible coal while turning a blind eye to China, which builds the equivalent of a coal plant a week.
“It’s the intellectual equivalent of putting your dog on a treadmill and claiming you’re getting healthy because of the machine’s readout.”
Turner said “the greens” are never satiated with the closure of a plant. They must destroy.
See more here climatechangedispatch
Header image: Et Cio
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
VOWG
| #
One thing about stopping the use of coal now, is that it will still be there years from now when new generations need it to keep warm, run industry, and build things. It will make a come back as it ultimately will have to be used to survive.
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi VOWG,
Very wise comment. There is always a POSITIVE GOOD to counter a NEGATIVE EVIL.
Have a good day
Reply
Aaron
| #
“good” and “evil” are only PERCEPTIONS
Everything we hear is an OPINION, not FACT.
Everything we see is a PERSPECTIVE not the TRUTH.
Marcus Aurelius
Reply
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Aaron,
I read that Marcus Aurelius was a stoic philospher who ruled the Roman Empire for 19 years. I read a stoic is a person who can endure pain or hardship without showing their feelings or complaining. Hence, my father was a stoic who grew food for animals and humans as a FARMER for more than 80 years and lived 90+ years. And I never heard him complain once that he was POOR (not rich).
And no one can ever convince me that Marcus Aurelius and my Father were not FACTS, And YOU (a person) and I (a person) are FACTS.
Have a good day
Reply
Howdy
| #
Stoicism is a forced way of living to be ‘better’, yet like all forced methods of living, it’s an illusion, a pantomime, hence the drivel ‘wise’ words from such people.
Good and evil are a polarity, that is a fact.
It helps to put things into context if one understands the nature of the subject one is talking about
Reply
Howdy
| #
What you read about stoicism is wrong Jerry. Humble people live life without complaining because that is their nature, Stoics, not.
Forced way of life as I said.
https://dailystoic.com/what-is-stoicism-a-definition-3-stoic-exercises-to-get-you-started/
Howdy
| #
Jerry, I see my reply concerning your Father might be taken in the wrong sense.
You said: “I read a stoic is a person who can endure pain or hardship without showing their feelings or complaining. Hence, my father was a stoic”.
You describe Humility not Stoicism, so it would be fair to say your Father was a humble man. Humility is a virtue, and currently is exceedingly rare one.
Stoicism is a discipline, a false aura, like yoga, or Taoism. A means to an end.
I just wanted to clear that up.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi Howdy,
“What you read about stoicism is wrong.” The word I referred to was stoic, not stoicism.
Have a good day
Reply
Howdy
| #
Actually, you typed: “Hence, my father was a stoic”. You provided a definition of what the man was, not a characteristic. e.g. “when it came to matters of national interest, the official was very stoic in approach”.
A stoic practices stoicism, as a chemist practices chemistry.
Be more specific next time.
Reply