Peer-reviewed paper challenges safety of wireless exposure limits
The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), authors of a recent scientific study, have confirmed that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) wireless exposure guideline, based on science from the 1980’s, is wrong and needs to be revised.
According to the researchers, the current RFR [radiofrequency radiation] exposure limits do not consider potential synergistic effects that reflect modern day exposures to multiple environmental agents. Current guidelines also do not consider duration of exposure to RFR.
Adverse health effects at exposures far below the threshold dose claimed by these agencies, are well documented in scientific studies that according to Dr. Ronald Melnick:
“have demonstrated oxidative effects associated with exposure to low-intensity RFR [radiofrequency radiation], and significant adverse effects including cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, DNA damage, neurological disorders, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, and sperm damage.”
View 15 minute slide presentation reviewing the paper HERE
See more here zero5g.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
Unfortunately, peer reviewed means pretty much nothing in today’s world of massive corruption.
Reply
Tom O
| #
So? Does that take anything away from the validity of what is stated? I think not. Either the report is accurate or it isn’t, and that should have been what you decided to make your judgement on.
Reply