Pandemics Explained By Terrain Theory: Part 1
This is PART ONE of a two-part essay presenting evidence from known pandemics throughout history that can be better explained by the terrain theory of disease rather than Pasteur’s Germ Theory. (PART TWO here).
Ever since the start of the Covid 1984 program, we have all become aware of the term “pandemic”, although I believe that most people would not be able to give a proper definition — let alone the fact that it was been conveniently changed in 2009 at onset of the H1N1 scamdemic of that year.
Background information: Terrain Theory Versus Pasteur’s Germ Theory
In light of my debunking of the germ theory of disease and the lack of asymptomatic transmission among health individuals, I would like to go over the evidence surrounding some of the known pandemics throughout history and how they can be explained by the terrain model.
US Measles Outbreaks of 2019
There were numerous reported measles outbreaks in the US in 2019, which was blamed on the anti-vaccination movement. As we have seen in my germ theory article, well over 90 percent of infectious diseases have decreased not due to vaccines, but due to an increase in the quality of nutrition, sanitation and water purification and overall cleanliness. R.M. Barkin(1975) showed that children who lived at or below the poverty level, and especially in rural settings, were significantly more likely to die from measles than those in the higher income brackets.
According to Stefan Lanka, there is no evidence that the measles virus has been isolated form a host cell and proven to cause the illness. Lanka was vindicated in Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) Stuttgart (German Higher Court). Here is the court ruling from a few years back which involved Dr Stefan Lanka regarding the existence of the measles “virus”:
“As a result, the appeal, in so far as it is permissible, is at least successful because the plaintiff did not meet the criterion of claiming to prove the existence of the measles virus through “a scientific publication”. As a result, the plaintiff has no pre-judicial legal fees.” ( lrbw.juris.de)
However, there are other environmental factors that are known to cause measles. Incidences of measles have increased by 300 percent by the year 2019 according to the W.H.O. Chan (2017) suggests that air pollution is closely linked with measles outbreaks. This is also observed in China which has a close to 100 percent vaccination rate for measles. All epicenters are downwind from frack-gas fueled power plants, and suffer intense ground pollution from massive legacy industry (solvent spills). Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Sites correlate with measles case counts. Virology omits proper controls and toxicological factors are not discounted.
There was also another measles outbreak in nearby Brooklyn neighborhood of Williamsburg in 2018–19 and of course, no environment study was ever conducted. New York mayor Bill De Blasio dramatically pushed an emergency measles vaccine mandate on Williamsburg. Those not vaccinated were subject to $1000 fines. Williamsburg is rates as the most polluted city in the US UC Burkley’s Scorecard . Industrial effluents could flow an MGP (Manufacturing Gas Plants), and from chemical industries at 5th street near the river — to the positions under these buildings. See recent Aerial Photo with 2019 Measles Epicenter outlined:
BNY=Brooklyn Navy Yard
The area surrounding the Brooklyn Navy Yard has been heavily polluted ( halogenated compounds, cadmium, mercury, lead, arsenic, etc..)for centuries going back to the 17th century. These continue to poison the earth and air via earth plumes present-day. Four centuries of toxic waste were dumped into the earth before the US Environmental Protection Agency even existed.
“President John Adams first commissioned the Brooklyn Navy Yard in 1801, but activity at Wallabout Basin [now BNY] actually dates back to before then. In fact, long before then: The deed for the sale of Wallabout Basin dates back to 1637. The Dutch and the British used the shipyard for mercantile shipping” (see:web.archive.org)
In 1995, NYDEC classed BNY as a Superfund site for environmental cleanup. Toxic soil was replaced and water was tested for PCBs and declared safe. EPA removed BNY from Superfund status, claiming to have remediated the site.
Another example of pollution being heavily correlated with environmental pollution is — once again — China. Peng et. al examined the role of air pollutants on an incidence of a measles outbreak in Lanzhou and came to the following conclusion:
“By collecting daily data on measles cases, air pollutants, and meteorological data from 2005 to 2009 in Chengguan District of Lanzhou City, semi-parametric generalized additive model (GAM) was used to quantitatively study the impact of air pollutants and meteorological factors on daily measles cases. The results showed that air pollutants and meteorological factors had effect on the number of daily measles cases, and there was a certain lag effect. Except for SO2 and relative humidity, other factors showed statistically significant associations with daily measles cases: NO 2 lag 6 days, PM 10 and maximum temperature lag 5 days, minimum temperature and average temperature and average air pressure lag 4 days, visibility, and wind speed lag 3 days had the greatest impact on the number of daily measles cases”
Measles epidemics correlate with cold weather, when indoor pollution (stoves, boilers, and earth plumes) is contained by closed windows. According to Dolan 1985, stove exhaust can cause “flu like” symptoms. The New York Times — while covering the epidemic — casually mentions the link between indoor pollution and asthma. It’s important that much like Sars Cov 2, the measles virus has never been isolated and proven to cause said disease. You read Stefan Lanka’s article here. The same is holds true for the alleged polio virus. In the expert opinion of biochemist Howard Urnovitz, PhD:
“Poliovirus was not actually isolated by these investigators, either. They successfully grew “filterable agents,” which they assumed to be poliovirus, in human embryonic tissues.”
Resolving the “unvaccinated” issue
The major news outlets claimed that the measles outbreak spread mostly among unvaccinated children in various New York neighborhoods. As we have previously discussed, a toxic environment combined with weather conditions have a large impact on the occurrences of measles. So why is it that only the unvaccinated seem to be only ones effected? Is it really because religious anti-vaxx parents put their children in harm’s way? One can easily argue that any parent is putting a child in harm’s way by raising them in such toxic environments.
In any case, the reason that that this outbreak seemed to have effected almost exclusively unvaccinated children is simply due to confirmation bias. Doctors — — under their faith-based belief that vaccines work — are more likely to diagnose a disease as something else in vaccinated persons. This is simply human nature. The Center for Disease Control actually instructs doctors to do this in the context of outbreaks.
“To minimize the problem of false positive laboratory results, it is important to restrict case investigation and laboratory tests to patients most likely to have measles (i.e., those who meet the clinical case definition, especially if they have risk factors for measles, **such as being unvaccinated** [my emphasis]recent history of travel abroad, without an alternate explanation for symptoms, for example epi-linked to known parvovirus case) or those with fever and generalized maculopapular rash with strong suspicion of measles.”
Therefore, any case numbers derived from uncontrolled human observation are intrinsically biased by belief in vaccination success itself, making it circular in nature and woefully unscientific. The belief is a self-fulfilling prophecy. This bias explains why the disease is “found” more often in unvaccinated individuals and also why its “incidence” declined as the numbers of vaccinated grew. One might argue that it is not possible to mistake these diseases for others. However, were that true then there would be no need for differential diagnosis nor laboratory confirmation when diagnosing them, a requirement for almost all VPDs (Vaccine Preventable Diseases).
This behavior by the medical authorities was also absorbed 5 years ago during the Disney World measles outbreak. They performed 2500+ PCR tests on suspected cases after rash presentation began, i.e. cases that looked exactly like measles. Only 131 were confirmed to have the virus. If the “outbreak” of rashes were truly caused by the virus then it is implausible that only 5 percent of clinical rash cases had the purported causative factor.
Health officials find what they set out to find. It makes for great narrative but awful science.
Great Smog of London
The Great Smog event that took place in London, UK in 1952 was the result of a mixture of factors. The main culprits were air pollution, unusually cold temperatures and windless days. This resulted in a dangerous accumulation of air pollutants, which in turn led to the smog. This is what London looked like during the smog event (below).
Some 6,000 Londoners perished as a result of the smog. The authorities had initially attempted to blame the respiratory infections on an influenza epidemic but it became clear that the main cause was the pollution.
There was no panic, as London was infamous for its fog. In the weeks that ensued, however, statistics compiled by medical services found that the fog had killed 4,000 people. Only a small minority of cases were actually linked to influenza.
Most of the deaths were caused by respiratory tract infections, from hypoxia and as a result of mechanical obstruction of the air passages by pus arising from lung infections caused by the smog, according to a paper published by Peters et al in The Lancet.
The Black Plague
The Black Death was an outbreak of disease that killed millions of people across Europe and Asia. Most people think that the disease was the bubonic plague. Around 50 million people were killed by the bubonic plague, and was at its worst between 1347 and 1351. The disease may have started in Asia.
This disease is carried and spread by fleas living on rats. Traders from the Silk Road (a group of trading routes that went across Asia to the Mediterranean sea) may have brought the infected fleas to Europe.
Bubonic plague disease is said to be caused by a bacterium named Yersinia Pestis. This bacterium has also been found in other types of plagues such as Septicemic plague and pneumonic plague. DNA from this bacterium has also been found in DNA from victims of the Justinian Plague¹.
Mainstream thinking has concluded that rats and other rodents carry Yersinia pestis and pass it along to fleas. When rats die, the blood-sucking fleas leave them to prey on other rats, dogs, and humans. The bacterium then enters humans through mosquito bites. Modern science believes that the time of Justinian, rats on merchants ships carried the microorganism to the other Mediterranean ports.²
However, some investigators have found some flaws with the theory that the bacterium was the main culprit in the black death. Although researchers found evidence of Yersina pestis in dental pulp from a mass grave of the period in France, other teams of scientists were unable to find evidence of the pathogen in five other grave sites from other parts of Europe³.
Sociologist Susan Scott and biologist Christopher J. Duncan claim that a hemorrhage fever similar to Ebola virus, caused the Black Death.
Others blame anthrax or some now-extinct disease. They note that medieval accounts don’t square descriptions of the illness. Witnesses described a disease that spread at great speed with very high mortality, unlike other pandemics or plagues, which moves slowly and had a death rate of about 60 percent⁴. Accounts described buboes covering the entire body rather than limited to the groin area as in the case of the plague.
Symptom descriptions mention awful odors, splotches resembling bruises, delirium, and stupor — none of which happen with modern day bubonic plagues. The bacterium theory with regard to the black death doesn’t explain the rapid spread and it’s strikingly high mortality rate⁵
Another explanation for the Black Death is that it came from infected rats and then spread to humans across Europe. One of the main problems with this theory is that there are no written documents from the era that describe vast legions of dead rats required to explain the plague. The plague killed over half of Iceland’s population but rats didn’t reach the country until about the 19th century.⁶ And the Black Death continued to kill people during the winder in most of northern Europe despite the fat that the plague organism requires relatively warm temperatures.⁷-mike bailie, pg.12].
In New Light on the Black Death: The Cosmic Connection, Professor Emeritus of Paleoecology Mike Baillie argues that a comet caused the pandemic. He points out that witnesses of the period describe a significant earthquake on January 25, 1348, with other earthquakes to follow. “There have been masses of dead fish, animals, and other things along with the sea shore and in many places covered in dust”,⁸ wrote a contemporary observer. “And all these things seem to have come from the great corruption of the air and earth”⁹
Other documents describe tidal waves, rains of fire, foul odors and strange colors in the sky, mists and even dragons, in addition to earthquakes. Baillie believes fragments from Comet Negra, which passed by the Earth in 1347, caused the atmospheric phenomena.
Some fragments descended and injected huge amounts of dust into the atmosphere. Tree ring analysis indicates that as the material descended from space, it spewed large amounts of chemicals based on carbon and nitrogen into the stratosphere. According to Baillie, illness and death resulted from poisoned water and air as the comet flew overhead.¹⁰
All the symptoms of the Black Death — especially bruises like blotches on the kin and high fatality rates — strongly indicate radiation poisoning, probably rendered even more deadly by dust and ammonia-like compounds in the atmosphere. Prof. Bailie concludes that :
“The Black Death sits in a clear environmental trough visible in smoothed tree ring chronologies from around the world”¹¹— Bailie 37]
The corruption of the atmosphere must have certainly been severe to have been able to generate a “clear environmental trough”; it was sufficiently severe to have been able to cause death from respiratory problems. Curiously enough, there were other incidences of pandemics occurring after a major comet.
There were other previous pandemics in history that were potentially connected to comets and other events in nature. For example, Dr. Marc Barton from the Imperial College of London also theorizes that natural occurring events such as comets, volcanoes and drastic climate changes may have been co-factors in previous pandemics.
The above is the first of a two-part Principia Scientific presentation taken from the full original essay, which may be accessed at lordchewy.medium.com
References:
- Cowan, Thomas M.D. The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (Including “Coronavirus”) Are Not The Cause of Disease. Skyhorse Publishing 2020, 88p.
- ibid
- Susan Scott & Christopher Duncan, Return of the Black Death: The World’s Greatest Serial Killer (Wiley, 2004) p.190
- ibid, p.179
- Cowan, Contagion Myth, p.91
- Scott & Duncan, Return of the Black Death, p.190–91
- Baille, Mike. New Light on the Black Death: The Cosmic Connection. ( The History Press, 2006) p.12
- Ibid, 94
- ibid, 94–95
- ibid p.177–78
- ibid, p.37
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Jerry Krause
| #
Hi PSI Readers,
Started to read this article but did not get past the link to R M Barkin (1975) article where in its abstract where I read: “Mortality rates were highest in children 6–11 months of age.” So, out of curiosity I checked when vaccines for measles were recommended to be given. Where I read: “CDC recommends all children get two doses of MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine, starting with the first dose at 12 through 15 months of age, and the second dose at 4 through 6 years of age.”
More than 20 years earlier, in rural setting, I had measles and mumps and chicken pox and various other common childhood health problems (at that earlier time). But I didn’t die. My bother was 10 years older during the 30s when most everybody in a rural area of the US was poor by many standards. My parents could not afford a telephone which they had had before the 30s. But my bother didn’t die either.
So I quit reading what seemed, relative to my experiences, nonsense.
Have a good day, Jerry
Reply
Greg Spinolae
| #
It is the DEBATE between “germ theory” and “terrain theory” that is non-science.
I can never understand why some of those purporting to be “scientists” insist on becoming religious acolytes for just ONE of two (or more) THEORIES when BOTH (or several) have CREDIBLE elements of value.
I suppose such debates serve to SEPARATE actual scientists from those masquerading as “scientists”. Actual scientists understand that there is no such thing as settled science or “THE Science” and that every “agreed” principle is at best an approximation to reality.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Greg,
I miss when the comments were a discussion on the merits of theories or the validity of experiments and data. It seems now to be a collection of commentators pushing their opinions and agendas. Why does a site about science attract religious zealots and lunatics (Sir-iso) with their adamant assertions that what they say is “right” because that is what they believe?
The theories on the transmission of disease are certainly open to debate. Why, as in the case of a friends family, do all members come down with the disease but how ill they become varies greatly and why do others who had the same exposure not get sick at all? There is certainly some validity to both arguments and I believe that both are correct in some measure. The arguments trying to invalidate the other position are not conclusive IMO. When a person gets symptoms it is a result of their immune system reacting and attacking the pathogen.Does this make the person who is ill less likely to transmit the pathogen or change it so it can’t be identified? I would expect that if you wanted to find the causative agent for a disease you would need to get sample from an exposed person before they show symptoms resulting from an immune response.
Herb
Reply
Howdy
| #
“Why does a site about science attract religious zealots and lunatics”
Because the Admin allow It Herb.
Reply
Herb Rose
| #
Hi Howdy,
Since I am a radical anti-physicist I appreciate PSI not censoring bizarre beliefs. It’s a difficult job to judge between strange and different and once you begin how do stop from becoming an enforcer of orthodoxy?
The question has more to do with evangelizing your own beliefs. Is the need to convert others due to insecurity in your own beliefs or the seeking of security by becoming part of a larger tribe?
Herb
Reply
Howdy
| #
I like your answers Herb.
For myself, I’m happy on my own, but I have “egged on” a comment before that chimes.
Squidly
| #
I am in agreement with you Herb. Pathology and virology are extremely complex issues for which I reject the simple answers, much like trying to describe the entire universe in a single theorem. No such simple answers exist.
Reply
MattH
| #
Hi Greg and curious bystanders.
I agree with your fundamental concept of multiple hypothesis, triggers and causation, cumulative effect.
We carry a multitude of pathogens within us which our normal biological functions keep in check.
They say there is no such thing as bad weather, only bad clothing.
I work in the elements and if a sudden change of weather occurs from warm to cold without increasing thermal protection, (clothing , Especially the head, down back to below kidneys ) i will get whacked by a corona virus. The virus or whatever adjective you wish, was always there inside and being cold compromises biological function to allow the pathogen to dominate.
From the second part.
“the pilot, coming on board found the captain ill in his berth, and on being told the symptoms at once said, ‘It is the influenza: I have just had it myself”¹⁸(Charles Creighton — A history of Epidemics in Britain 1894, p.430)
The captain had just sailed from England in winter, crossed the equator, bloody hot, and sailed into autumn NZ. New Zealand is infamous for “four seasons in one day”. The pilot had just had influenza and the skipper had recently come from the tropics to four seasons in one day and if he had put on a double lined woolen hat with a balaclava over the top with four good layers down his back keeping out cold and wind he would have probably kept the resident pathogens in check. But he didn’t. He went and got cold didn’t he.
As for solar activity . Highly likely an influence on a number of counts. Around six weeks ago we had our first X rated solar flare in over 2 years and we suddenly have some corresponding global extreme weather events. Could be partially coincidence being peak od NH summer. And electrical charges. We all know that effects biology, and mood. Negative charge air and we are in a good mood. Positively charged, sultry and there is going to be a gunfight in Texas and a hangin’.
And then there is the full moon…..
And what about……
Reply
Allan Shelton
| #
Doesn’t the author have spell check?
Many errors that I saw.
Reply
Greg Spinolae
| #
It’s heartening to see the commenters on this article demonstrate that “science” is still alive.
THANK YOU ALL❗
Reply
Chris
| #
Why don’t you guys look into what Targeted Individuals have been saying for years. We are being hit with technology maybe something like the 5G networks, we have been forcibly injected with something, we are the guinea pigs of what is now happening. Look into TARGETED INDIVIDUALS testimonies
Reply