This post summarises some of the lies associated with the recent Harvey et al paper. There’s also a request for reader input! See bold italics below.

Re-examination of cold, hard data relating to the climate debate and whether earth’s atmosphere cools or warms us, is becoming an obsession among an increasing number of independent and curious applied scientists and engineers.

After 3o years of being browbeaten about man-made global warming by government ‘scientists’, skeptical specialists from applied science and engineering are exposing just how much those ‘experts’ have been lying to us.

Researchers in the U.S. just came one step closer to achieving immortality through “cryo-preservation” or the freezing of bodies in the hopes of bringing them back to life at a later time.

Although only performed on zebra fish embryos, advances in cryo-preservation succeeded in preserving brains and bodies “in a state of suspended animation” by freezing and reviving individuals at the time of their choice.

November 29, 2017, was once again a climate alarm propaganda day in the German public television and radio stations of SRF (Süddeutsche Rundfunk). But it was even more shocking to see the primitive level of argumentation used there to fan fear among the public.

Why should everyone read what Galileo wrote?  To see what he did that they probably have not done during their lives to the point of time they are reading what he wrote.  Like, read what Aristotle had written nearly two millennia earlier?  What Galileo wrote is only about four centuries ago.

We know more about space than the behavior and structure of the ocean deep. Scientists recently discovered that deep ocean currents cause sediment avalanches and changes to rivers and the sea floor.

Isn’t modern science and technology wonderful? The UN has confirmed that official data indicates 2017 will be a record year for worldwide food production.

I want to have a go at analysing the World’s Worst Scientific Paper one of these days, but first there’s the question: Who among the fourteen listed authors actually wrote it?

The UN’s climate summit in Paris at the end of 2015 concluded with a bang. The world’s governments promised sweeping cuts in carbon emissions. Rich countries promised to help poor ones with $100 billion per year in climate assistance.

Does capitalism help or hurt women? A fascinating book from Cambridge University Press, Capitalism, For and Against: a Feminist Debate, seeks to answer that question.

Alarmist scientists have been caught red-handed tampering with raw data in order to exaggerate sea level rise.

The raw (unadjusted) data from three Indian Ocean gauges – Aden, Karachi and Mumbai – showed that local sea level trends in the last 140 years had been very gently rising, neutral or negative (ie sea levels had fallen).

Characterizing a professional, respected scientist as an unqualified vengeful opinion writer is the same kind of power attack as rape. It’s meant to humiliate and intimidate.

We started writing this article before the German elections in September, which included Angela Merkel for Chancellor. At the end of the article we gave advice to the German voters.

How deep can seawater penetrate through cracks and fissures into the seafloor? Using a new analysis method, an international team of researchers, led by the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, has discovered that the water can penetrate more than 10 kilometres below the seabed.

There are more than a dozen versions of the IAT, each designed to evaluate unconscious social attitudes towards a particular characteristic, such as weight, age, gender, sexual orientation, or race. They work by measuring how quick you are to associate certain words with certain groups.