It’s been exactly one year since US scientists reported a mysterious surge in ozone-destroying chemicals, known as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).

Climate alarmists habitually issue predictions of doom and gloom that are either too vague or too far into the future to be tested.

In a rare departure from this, alarmists have issued a prediction that can be tested within the next 30 years, or sooner.

If you browse the mainstream media headlines here in the United States, you’ll be led to believe that 5G is an amazing, next-generation wireless technology that will make everything faster, easier, and more incredible.

As a follow-up to my previous video, I discuss the difference between fake heuristics such as we see in climate change, and true heuristics such as we use for teaching Newton’s Laws of Motion.

Did you know that there are two “greenhouse effects”? One is what we find in an actual, real greenhouse and thus actually physically exists and is real.

Ever notice how, in the last decade or so, we quietly stopped just having storms and started having “extreme weather events”?

It feels like no temperature drop or seasonal downpour is too small for the media to slap a scary name on it and issue minute-by-minute warnings.

Tornadoes — and especially F3 or stronger tornadoes — are becoming increasingly rare as the Earth continues its modest warming, but the media are claiming a rare outbreak of recent tornadoes in Kansas is “the new normal.”

My five-year-old daughter has a few animal books, published for children by National Geographic.  She likes them very much. They are not political. Written long before global warming became an issue.

Stubbornly defying global warming is Antarctica. A number of studies have been showing the opposite of climate alarmist predictions for the South Pole (apart for some volcanic activity beneath parts of the Antarctic ice shelf).

If we take a look at the basis of climate physics and climate change, we see that the entire field and entire agenda is based on an inversion of reality which they perform right at the very foundation of their pseudoscientific research.

We often encounter this back-up argument that the climate physics greenhouse effect “is only a heuristic” and that isn’t the real greenhouse effect of climate physics.

The following is an excerpt from a video presentation that James will deliver to the Red Pill Expo in Hartford, CT. The Red Pill Expo runs from June 7-9, 2019 and more information can be found at RedPillExpo.org.

In 2015, Pfizer’s Prevnar 13 vaccine (which protects against common strains of pneumonia) made more money than either Lipitor or Viagra, two of Pfizer’s top-selling drugs, thanks to the U.S. government recommendation to start using it in seniors over 65.

A D.C.-based libertarian think tank petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on a years-long defamation case involving leaked emails from climate scientists that seriously undermined the credibility of alarming global warming predictions.

In this video I use the most basic transitive logic in order to prove that the modern scientific method has committed such a scale of an error that it indicates a fundamental, systemic, structural flaw in the method.