Sand deposits near the Gobi Desert in China may seem a strange place to look for evidence that cosmic rays can control how clouds are formed and the impact they have on Earth’s climate.

New study exposes statistical incompetence in public investment projects; research is being contaminated by subjective bias. Too much research work does not meet basic standards of validity and reliability.

Posted July 10, 2019 by Elsevier in papers.ssrn.com is ‘On De-Bunking ‘Fake News’ in the Post-Truth Era: How to Reduce Statistical Error in Research‘ which addresses the crisis of modern scientific research for ‘garbage in, garbage’ data misuse.

In this video I give another empirical demonstration, using a magnifying glass, that basic climate theory and its resulting political weather alarmism is fundamentally flawed at its basis and that the entire field of climate science is basically pseudoscience that even children can refute.

A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which ‘climate change’ is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint.

This essay explains in simple terms why so many people still believe that polar bears are in peril when nothing could be further from the truth; it is an essential lesson that shatters the basis of the shameful indoctrination of young school children and undermines the baseless claims of activist protestors.

For years, the mainstream media was predicting a coffee bean apocalypse caused by climate change. In 2018, the SF Gate reported:

It turns out that coffee is the latest food item to be under threat due to the rise of global temperatures.

Today’s silly climate-change story concerns the weather in London, which is going to resemble that of Barcelona by 2050.

It’s in the Guardian, so you will probably want to discount its factual accuracy anyway, but if by some mischance they have got it right, well it sounds great, I’m sure you’ll agree.

250,000 years ago, the polar ice caps expanded widely and deeply. They didn’t start melting back until 26,500 to 10,000 years ago.

There are those who do the usual human thing, boasting or accusing others of racial and ethnic inferiority, or of privilege or superiority. Are they missing the most important, glorious and beautiful points?

The book, ‘Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels’ is available online for free, in PDF format, at ClimateChangeReconsidered.org. This publication consists of a large book (768 pages) including a 23 page Summary for Policymakers which is also presented as a separate booklet.

Today I’m at the funeral of my dear friend Christopher Booker.

Were he alive — and I still can’t quite believe he is not — I know exactly what we’d have been talking about this morning: the risible section of last night’s Newsnight which the BBC had cobbled together in a sad, desperate, and unconvincing attempt to debunk the Climategate scandal.

Some are concerned that global warming will cause the polar ice caps to melt, leading to an increase in global sea level. If such a rise in sea level occurred slowly, coastal peoples would have time to adjust to the change.

The difference in the global warming scare and the Y2K crash that started in 1998 was that Y2K had a definite end date. That end date finally proved it to be a marketing ploy by software companies to sell unnecessary updates to data backup systems.

However, the climate change hype could go on indefinitely and that is what allows it to build and fester.

There has been a rise in the number of scientists claiming that major break-throughs in cancer cures are being deliberately suppressed by Big Pharma. Perhaps the adage “cure a patient, lose a customer” is now more than just a truism? Watch the video below and judge for yourself.