The coronavirus scandal, with billionaire oligarch “pandemic expert” Bill Gates pushing horror scenarios into the media, has contributed to politicians’ reaction of fear.

This, combined with mass media hysteria, has, in turn, caused a once-in-a-century financial depression.

Everyone who has been paying attention knows that the epidemiological models on which the current shutdown mania is based have been proved to be wrong, wrong, wrong. Yet, zombie-like, they continue to influence our ill-informed policymakers.

Since the intervention of the President of the USA, Donald Trump announcing that the FDA approved Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19, the news spread that a treatment was now available.

A respiratory therapist with 21 years of professional experience who works in a hospital in Georgia has posted a video on YouTube in which he explains all the problems, contradictions, and inconsistencies with the official narrative of the alleged COVID-19 ‘pandemic’.

Philosopher Nicholas Rescher once wrote, “Scientific discoveries are often made not on the basis of some well-contrived plan of investigation, but through some stroke of sheer luck.”

For a team of researchers at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, that statement couldn’t be more true.

The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated 50-100 million people during a pandemic 1918-19. What if the story  we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true?

What if, instead, the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin? Newly analyzed documents reveal that the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry.

As the new coronavirus took root across America, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sent states tainted test kits in early February that were themselves seeded with the virus, federal officials have confirmed.

I was prompted to write this after seeing two online newspaper articles linking climate change to virus epidemics. Some of the claims are truly absurd, and I have reproduced the relevant paragraphs and commented on them.

Climate science research and assessments have misused scenarios for more than a decade.

Symptoms of this misuse include the treatment of an unrealistic, extreme scenario as the world’s most likely future in the absence of climate policy and the illogical comparison of climate projections across inconsistent global development trajectories.

When the IMHE models were introduced, there was a pretty high peak in the number of COVID-19 infections. Related to this high peak, there were a significant number of hospitalizations and deaths in a very short time period.

At the very same time the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr Fauci and the media are deriding HCQ as ‘unsafe’ for treating COVID-19, the NIH backs dozens of clinical trials of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a safe treatment for cancer. How can that be?

In March 12^th, 2020, Anderson Cooper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta held a global town hall on “Corona Facts and Fears.” During the discussion, Anderson said to the viewing audience, “And, again, if you are concerned about coronavirus, and you haven’t gotten a flu shot…you should get a flu shot.”

We have been given a very clear narrative about the declared coronavirus pandemic.

The UK State has passed legislation, in the form of the Coronavirus Act, to compel people to self isolate and practice social distancing in order to delay the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (SC2).

A top U.S. scientist and research pioneer has broken her long silence, revealing an insider’s nightmare spanning three decades of conducting research under the governmental control of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Sweden was right all along – lockdown not needed. Official statistics reveal that the UK’s death toll due to COVID-19 is no worse than the country’s last bad influenza outbreak 20 years ago.

But before PM Boris Johnson claims victory for his quarantine measures he should take note of Sweden (which had no lockdown).

There is little, if any, discernible difference between the two countries on the rate or extent of deaths due to the disease. However, England did suffer more ‘unrelated deaths.’