no-virus people were right about fake ‘virus isolation’, fake ‘sequencing’
A document authored by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich was recently posted online, outlining a “covid” legal strategy
In this article, Reiner referenced Dr. Mike Yeadon (who has moved on from the covid “virus” hypothesis altogether) and a presentation which Reiner considered “brilliant” and “scientific”, from a man who acts as science advisor to RFK Jr. and Children’s Health Defense, Jay Couey.
Reiner also included a summary of alleged covid-19 facts, based on Jay’s presentation. In this summary, the “SARS-COV-2” narrative has been dropped entirely, admitting that there was no such thing.
But, the summary does involve four imaginary endemic coronaviruses that are supposedly everywhere and detected by the tests that don’t test for a virus (as David Icke has so accurately called them).
The password for accessing Jay’s presentation is: oa7=JU48. I watched it, and found that at the outset Jay admitted that he was only presenting a “hypothesis” about four (imaginary) viruses (not science).
Jay also admitted that no-virus people are “largely correct” and “not wrong” in our objections regarding fake “virus isolation” and fake “virus sequencing” / metagenomics. And he admitted that all-cause mortality patterns fit the no-virus reality. (But for some reason this realization is “frustrating” for Jay. It seems he would be happier if there were more of a “need” for a “virus”. Maybe this has something to do with his boss?)
“It’s frustrating because this is what gives the no virus people so much ground to stand on…
First of all, I assume that the protocols killed about everybody.
It’s hard for me to need any virus at all. When you do the real math, and you say, take away all the explainable deaths first, very little left for a real virus to have done.
And I think people like Denis Rancourt and others have really come to that conclusion with the math.”
Yet at the same time, Jay asserted that the narrative of no-virus and that the protocols caused all the deaths (which isn’t actually what most no-virus people say) is “dangerous” because it somehow enables the whole thing to happen all over again.
Maybe Jay has been working a little too hard like Del Bigtree, because this of course makes no sense. The no-virus reality is that there was no reason for anyone to have been tested or taken any sort of “measures”, 2020 should have been life-as-usual, and the phrase “covid-19” ought not even exist.
Because there was no science showing a virus, or a new disease, or contagion. This is the exact opposite of enabling the whole thing to happen again.
Stranger still, Jay spoke of “influenza viruses”, “adenoviruses”, “clones of viruses” and “synthetic viruses” as though these things really exist. He made claims about “4 endemic coronaviruses” that supposedly exist but lack pandemic-potential, as well as “SARS virus”, “SARS-COV-2” (claiming “its” genome has been found intact via nanopore sequencing – which he also stated several months ago to Eric Coppolino but never followed through with the promised evidence).
“On this background we have been enriching and growing and finding and doing whatever with Coronaviruses, and they’ve been released over and over again, and increasing in the background that nobody’s cared about.
It is on this background that the pandemic occurred.”
Jay even claimed that PCR tests are “hot” for “endemic/seeded coronaviruses”, calling them “crazy specific“.
I certainly don’t want to misinform anyone, so I wrote repeatedly to Jay and Reiner asking Jay to please share or cite the evidence he relies on for these many claims about “viruses”.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Mary Holland were copied, in order to keep everyone in the loop.
Despite several attempts between April 15 and April 27, Jay has never responded:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Reiner-Fuellmich-Jay-Couey-RFK-Jr-PACKAGE-April-2023.pdf
A “respectful” exit?
Analytical chemist Saeed Qureshi reviewed Jay’s presentation and commented:
“I could not believe what he was saying. He is completely (100%) in agreement that the pandemic and all related paraphernalia (virus, COVID-19, spread, mortality, PCR, etc., have been false or used falsely)…
… he implies or accepts that there is no virus. Still, he cannot and will not say it because it will ruin his credibility and career, like everyone else in the area and the subjects of virology and immunology. However, without saying it, he has accepted it very clearly.
From the beginning, I have been saying clearly and loudly that there is no \/irus, no ***demic, and nocine. Immunologists, virologists, and medical experts are realizing this now.
He is saying it in a way to have a “respectful” exit. Typical virology style – describe things in a confusing and convoluted way.
He knows the flaws and lies about the virus/virology and getting out of it. I doubt he will continue on the “virus track,” the way he described the “science” in the presentation.”
Dr. Sam Bailey has a related new video, not to be missed: substack.com
See more here substack.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Tom
| #
I am in the terrain theory camp. Until I see one provable SARS CoV-2 fact that cannot be explained by other ideas, facts, or theories, I remain completely skeptical of all pandemics.
All that happened was this: a presumed deadly virus + fear and panic + irrationality = forced mRNA injections for every person on the planet whether or not it was necessary, safe and effective. All those questions invite a big fat zero on the truthmeter.
The medical community was empowered by fake science and government money and as a result millions have suffered greatly or have been murdered. The fake pandemic rides off into the sunset until the next fake pandemic arrives on the horizon. Of course, these clowns can always predict the next big one as they have an inside track on the future of nature. Get real!
Reply
Lyonwiss
| #
Agree. There are few critical commentaries in medical research, to pretend consensus. Few experiments are replicated. Of those which are independently tested 50 percent are wrong, according to several experienced editors. For these reasons alone, medicine is not science. If physics were the same standard as medicine, planes would be falling out of the sky all the time.
Reply
Nigel
| #
I am of the thinking that there is no virus, that a huge red herring to throw researchers off, scare the public, waste valuable time and resources. One man who was ridiculed for his position early on was Dr. Brian Artis when he first suggested that snake venom could be in the water. Dr Artis has since made some amazing work in connecting the dots about his not-a viris-theory, backed up with pretty conclusive evidence regarding synthesized venoms from marine cone snails, and numerous highly venomous snakes. I highly suggest watching watch the water part 2 , Closing chapter. https://www.brighteon.com/66acc9f6-d3a8-4f28-a31f-afd83046955e
Reply
herb
| #
MASSIVE FRAUD: Evidence shows that covid data is 100% false
EXPOSING GLOBAL COVID FRAUD
It is hard to believe that such a global deception could occur, yet the evidence is all here. Thousands of medical doctors, nurses, and patients around the world testify of completely false covid registrations. Funeral directors confirm countless false death certificates.
Check the evidence for yourself…
https://stopworldcontrol.com/fraud/
Reply
Saeed Qureshi
| #
“Scientists” did not use control and cannot use control because it (control) is another name for isolated and purified substances, may it be the virus or its components (RNA or spike protein), which is not available. Therefore, it makes the whole story of the virus/pandemic false and deceptive.
Sequencing is also a smoke screen to hide the lie that the virus (control) is available or exists. Without the virus specimens, it is impossible to do sequencing (https://bioanalyticx.com/sequencing-of-the-virus-never…/). Saying it otherwise is either ignorance of relevant science or deception. It is not an opinion but a scientistic fact.
The theory or “science” of virus/virology is crumbling. It is unlikely that virology and regulatory authorities can be saved now.
Reply