No acceleration in sea level rise detected worldwide–New Study
A new peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Marine Science and Engineering challenges a key claim of climate science: that global sea level rise is accelerating.
An analysis of more than 200 long-term tide gauge records shows no evidence of such acceleration, while IPCC models systematically overestimate local sea level rise.
An analysis of more than 200 tide stations around the world shows that there is no evidence of a global acceleration in sea level rise. That is the surprising conclusion of the paper A Global Perspective on Local Sea Level Changes, published this week in the Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. It is a unique study by two Dutch researchers, Hessel Voortman and Rob de Vos.
The paper also shows that IPCC models significantly overestimate local sea level rise in 2020. This new publication is a follow-up to an earlier paper from 2023 in which first author Hessel Voortman demonstrated that sea level rise along the Dutch coast was not accelerating.
Full story here.
This certainly supports sea level trends around Britain and the US, which I have often highlighted.
I am glad to see a thorough, professional study on this matter. Claims of acceleration of sea level rise have only ever been dependent on dodgy satellite monitoring – a case of splicing two different sets of data together.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Defend The Scientific Method
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Trackback from your site.
Dean Jackson
| #
(1) Cold Kills, Warmth Nourishes
“Cold-related deaths outnumber heat deaths in all countries
What’s consistent in these studies is that cold-related deaths vastly outnumber those from heat.
In the Global Burden of Disease study, cold-related deaths were around four times higher than heat-related ones.
The study that estimates that 7.7% of deaths were attributed to temperature found that 7.3% were from cold temperatures; 0.4% were from heat.
In the “5 million death” study, 9.4% of deaths were related to sub-optimal temperatures. 8.5% were cold-related, and 0.9% were heat-related. This skew was true across all regions.
You can see these results in the chart below.
Globally, cold deaths are 9 times higher than heat-related ones. In no region is this ratio less than 3, and in many, it’s over 10 times higher. Cold is more deadly than heat, even in the hottest parts of the world.”
https://ourworldindata.org/part-one-how-many-people-die-from-extreme-temperatures-and-how-could-this-change-in-the-future
(2) The Loss Of Ground Ice: Post Glacial Rebound and the Asthenosphere’s Soft Mantle
The thin Earth surface sits on a soft rock blanket called the Asthenosphere that reacts to weight differentials on the surface. That means as ice runs off ground into the oceans, the weight of that added water sinks the oceans’ surface, while at the same time raising the land surface (postglacial land uplift), resulting in an increase in (1) land surface; and (2) land capable of cropping. That means Greenland, with a landmass eight times greater than Great Britain, is slated to be a fertile land once again, and capable of sustaining a population equal to approximately 8X that of Great Britain.
The less ice on the planet the better for human growth, but that would violate the Satanist establishment’s objective of sabotaging God’s prime directive to be fruitful and multiply.
(3) Floods, tornadoes & hurricanes
To move requires energy. Energy requires an engine that produces the energy. Thermal energy’s movement is in the convective direction of warmer to cooler. The engine, then, is a relatively cold upper troposphere and a relatively hot lower troposphere to increase the severity of thermal convective uplift to a critical point where the centripetal force of the Earth’s rotation creates the rotational mechanism for a new hurricane. Increasing the temperature of the upper and lower troposphere decreases the intensity of thermal energy’s convective uplift resulting in (1) fewer hurricanes; and (2) less intense hurricanes.
A warming planet means less severe storms, as identified by simple physics that when two weather collision extremes are muted, so too are the severity of tornadoes, hurricanes, etc.
Since the Earth is warming, we’re told, that means the upper and lower troposphere are now warmer, thereby damping [pun intended] the severe effects when colder air in the upper troposphere collides with warmer air in the lower troposphere.
In order to increase the severity of a storm, more energy is required, and that energy can only be increased by increasing the intensity of heat transfer from the warmer air mass below to a colder air mass above, which is called convection. Critical convection in the oceans, mixed with the spin of the atmosphere from west to east, following the spin of the planet, produces hurricanes, but if the upper troposphere is now also getting warmer due to “climate change”, then the energy intensity between the lower and upper troposphere is decreased, thereby (1) decreasing the number of tropical storms; and (2) decreasing the number of tropical storms that evolve into hurricanes.
(4) Drought
A warming planet means greater evaporation of water, hence increased rainfall.
Reply