New Zealand Surgeon Forced To Have Covid Jabs To Keep His Job

I am a surgical specialist in a provincial hospital in New Zealand. I was forced against my will by Ardern, Hipkins and Bloomfield to have three mRNA jabs to keep my job

I have a mortgage and a family to provide for. I left it as late as possible but was told I would lose my job if I did not.

After the first and second jabs, I had cardiac arrhythmias, brief sharp chest pains, and breathlessness, and was tired for several months.

Some nights when going to sleep with my resting pulse over 100, I wondered if I would wake up in the morning.

I was coerced into this situation by non-medical tyrants I did not vote for. When I saw my GP about this, he asked if I thought I was anxious!

Three close colleagues have also been similarly affected. One, arguably the best in his field in our area, has left medicine completely and is still being hounded by the Medical Council.

Another was stood down until he relented – the stress on his family and department (covering on-call, etc) has been huge. The third was forced to stop work for many months with no income, as he would not be vaccinated and he is still being persecuted over a trivial, trumped-up matter by the Medical Council.

All four of us have endured the ridicule of our unthinking follow-the-script colleagues, some of whom have since had myocarditis and other health problems, and are not quite so critical anymore.

Nurses we worked with have been mandated out of work.

Others, forced to be jabbed, have had serious cardiac side effects – these are young healthy mothers. The DHB system, now TWO systems (Te Whatu Ora) has never been so shambolic, nor run down, as it is right now.

A colleague joked the other day:

You turn up to do your operating list but it has fallen apart yet again because:

1 There are no beds;

2 There are too few anaesthetists;

3 There are no radiographers;

4 There are no anaesthetic technicians;

5 Any or all of the above.

Except it is not a joke; it is reality.

The people who are meant to support and facilitate the clinical staff, so we can get on and care for patients, have failed in their duty. The Government – Labour – has totally failed. Te Whatu Ora is a mess.

And now, to get to the point of my piece, we have found out from an OIA this week that secret deals were made for 11,000 jab exemptions. I am dumbfounded, shocked.

I actually do not have the words for how gutted and betrayed I feel. This is beyond anything.

After all the threats, coercion, marginalisation, personal health effects, and being called a conspiracy theorist – to find out the Labour Government conspired with its officials to gaslight us, force us to be jabbed, lie it was safe and fully tested, while all the while quietly letting “their own” off the hook.

I finally now can never forgive them. The further damage this does to the very shaky Te Whatu Ora is yet to be seen, but it will do nothing to strengthen the recovery that must happen.

I have nothing but contempt for the people who are meant to run the health system, and now after thirty years of working for them, I feel absolutely no loyalty.

I do not see how I can keep working for them after their two-faced betrayal.

See more here substack.com

Header image: Bloomberg

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About Covid 19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.

Comments (11)

  • Avatar

    Howdy

    |

    Considering the jabs may cause total dysfunction and inability to continue working, thus no income for the mortgage, was acceptance a wise choice anyway?
    Is life not more important than tangible belongings?

    “I feel absolutely no loyalty.”
    One is no more than a number on the payroll database. Loyalty is for the employed to show to the employer, not the reverse.

    “I do not see how I can keep working for them after their two-faced betrayal.”
    Considering the events after the jabs, that decision may be out of your hands.

    This incident was a major life decision affecting the future, and while there is no correct choice, how the future plays out is determined by the decision you took.
    Indeed, the resulting outcome may be the same regardless of choice.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Penguinite

      |

      How is jab coercion any different to rape? Like you, my problem lies with the authorities that blithely mandated a poison for general acceptance but gave a free pass and protection from ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS to the pharmaceutical companies that concocted this pseudo vaccine. Duplicitous Politicians were allowed automatic exemptions!

      Reply

  • Avatar

    VOWG

    |

    Courage is such a fleeting thing. Let your no be no.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi PSI Readers (common commenters),

      This comment has nothing to do with this article. But I need to report about what I just did and what I found. (https://www.mdhearingaid.com/hearing-aids/mdhearing-volt/?utm_source=criteo&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=lowerfunnel&utm_id=170645&cto_pld=QbWojuy0AACosjCJaECeaA)

      I used the PSI search engine to find James McGinn and found a series articles written by Herb Rose which I cannot remember even if one can read that I also made comments to Herb’s comments. As I reread Herb’s (James’?) comments, I now conclude what I read should be thoughtfully considered. Hence I remind you of the link’s existence. Maybe we all might start over.

      Have a good day

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Jerry Krause

        |

        Hi,,

        When I check this link I do not find what I thought I copied. So to find Herb’s comments one needs to do what I described I had done. Hopefully you will because what I read I consider to be “good stuff’.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Joe

          |

          Jerry the link is to hearing aid adds. If you have something to say ….why not say it!

          Reply

        • Avatar

          Jerry Krause

          |

          Hi Joe,

          you state and ask: ” If you have something to say ….why not say it!” My answer: I am old. So my eyes and fingers, among too many other things, don’t work well plus the fact is I am not very intelligent. I mainly only know that which I have read. So I want to give credit to the ideas of others. But because of what you wrote, I’m not sure you will understand what I have just written.

          Have a good dah

          Reply

  • Avatar

    Jerry Krause

    |

    Hi Joe,

    But I can do this for Herb and you.

    What Do Thermometers And Barometers Actually Measure?

    Written by Herb Rose on January 16, 2023. Posted in Current News

    The thermometer and barometer are two instruments fundamental to atmospheric sciences but the problem is that the people using these instruments have no idea about what information the instruments are providing.
    The thermometer does not measure the kinetic energy of the molecules in the atmosphere and the barometer does not record the pressure or weight of the molecules in the atmosphere.

    The only difference in the design of the two instruments is that a thermometer has its measuring liquid totally enclosed while the barometer has the reservoir exposed to the atmosphere.

    Both are measuring data from the gas molecules in the atmosphere, but somehow people believe that the little piece of glass enclosing the bulb of the thermometer is converting the units of the data from weight per unit area to mass times velocity squared.

    In the troposphere the transfer of energy is primarily done through convection or collisions by the gas molecules while in the layers above the troposphere the primary way energy is transferred is by radiation. With convection there is a direct transfer of energy between objects while with radiation objects transfer energy to and absorb energy from the energy field they are in.

    All objects with energy will radiate energy and all objects will absorb radiated energy until stasis is reached, where the energy being radiated is the same as the energy being absorbed. With radiation the transfer of energy declines as the energy of an object approaches the energy of the surrounding field while with collisions there is instantaneous transfer of energy from the object with more energy to the other object.

    With convection the energy is distributed equally to the mass of both objects.

    With convection the transfer of energy does not follow the laws of radiation but the transfer is done according to the laws of conservation of momentum. With radiation an object with more kinetic energy cannot gain energy from an object with less kinetic energy but with convection a “colder” object can transfer energy to an object with more kinetic energy.

    When there is a collision, energy is transferred from the object with greater velocity to the object with less velocity, regardless of the masses of the objects.

    In reality the atmosphere does not have distinct layers but has a gradual changing of density and composition as the altitude changes. The layers are artificial demarcations

    with the most being of layers reflecting temperature flow changes. The troposphere, or bottom layer of the atmosphere, is the where the temperature declines and liquid water moderates the flow of energy. In the higher atmosphere (stratosphere increasing temperature, mesosphere decreasing temperature, and thermosphere increasing temperature) radiation is the primary way energy is transferred and the flow of energy will follow the rules of radiation.

    Because objects radiate energy in all directions, gas molecules with greater energy will transfer energy to gas molecules with less energy slowing the rate at which they cool. The absorption and loss of energy in the atmosphere is greatest in the thermosphere where the energy being radiated by the sun is greatest and it must cool before lower molecules cool.

    The source of energy at an altitude of fifty one kilometers heating the stratosphere remains a mystery.

    THERMOMETER

    A thermometer is used to measure the energy of gasses in the troposphere and it is measuring the momentum of the molecules striking it not radiated energy. What radiation an object can absorb is limited by the structure of the object so the wavelengths of radiated energy a thermometer could absorb would depend on the materials it was made from.

    The instrument was designed to measure the flow of kinetic energy from one medium to another but when the entire instrument is exposed to one medium, as in the atmosphere, it will measure the energy of that medium not a flow of energy. As the medium it is in changes, the thermometer will adjust to equalize with these changes and since momentum is a measurement of mass times the velocity as either of these factors change, it will produce a change in the thermometer’s reading. When the energy of the molecules change this will change the amount of energy being transferred to the thermometer and also, as the number (or mass) of the molecules change the amount of energy being transferred will change.

    The measurement by the thermometer is of the amount of energy being transferred to it, not the magnitude or kinetic energy of the molecules. The instrument has no way of distinguishing if the amount of energy it receives comes from many molecules with little energy or few molecules with greater energy.

    A look at the graph of temperatures at different altitudes clearly shows that the thermometer is not measuring the kinetic energy of the molecules. The flow of energy does not pause or reverse directions it goes from higher energy to lower energy. The graph is a result of both the mass (number of molecules transferring energy) and the energy of the molecules changing as the altitude changes. In order to compare the kinetic energy of the molecules in the atmosphere you must divide the measured temperature at an altitude by the density at that altitude.

    This will give the energy of a constant number of molecules instead of the energy of a constant volume.

    The graph of temperature divided by density shows that the energy in the atmosphere is increasing with increasing altitude. The energy of the gas molecules in the troposphere,

    where water moderates the flow of energy, increases in a straight line with altitude while at higher altitudes the kinetic energy of molecules increases in an exponential curve as the energy is distributed to more and more molecules.

    This shows that the flow of energy is from the sun to the surface of the Earth and water is absorbing that energy from the surface and transporting it higher to the stratosphere where it is radiated into space.

    The reason it is warmer at lower altitudes is not because the gas molecules have more energy but because there are more of them transferring energy and even though the magnitude of the energy is decreasing the amount of energy transferred increases.

    The atmosphere is created by the energy of the molecules expanding against gravity and the idea that these molecules will gain energy from gravity as they descend as a result of

    losing energy is ridiculous.

    There are two factors controlling the flow of energy in the troposphere, the energy coming from the sun adding energy to the atmosphere and the Earth and water removing energy from the Earth and atmosphere and transporting that energy to the top of the troposphere to be radiated into space.

    The sun heats the atmosphere as oxygen and nitrogen gasses absorb radiated ultraviolet energy (all matter absorbs radiated energy) and converts it into infrared energy while the

    surface of the Earth absorbs the longer wavelengths of visible light and converts these wavelengths into infrared energy. Over ninety percent of the ultraviolet light coming to the Earth is absorbed in the atmosphere heating it. Because the law of conservation of momentum applies in the troposphere the gas molecules in the atmosphere with greater velocity will add to the energy of the Earth even though the surface of the Earth is warmer (radiating more energy). It is the atmosphere that is adding heat to the surface of the Earth, not the Earth heating the atmosphere.

    Water absorbs the infrared energy emitted by the surface and the gasses in the atmosphere and converts this radiated energy into internal energy. Water in the atmosphere is not a gas but micro droplets of liquid crystals. The phase chart of water shows that at standard atmospheric pressure water as a gas does not exist below its boiling point. (James McGinn) Infrared radiation causes some water to split into hydroxyl and hydrogen ions.

    The water is converting thermal energy into stored electrical energy. The hydroxyl ions combine with other water molecules to form a crystal shell around the hydronium ion. (See Dr. Gerald Pollack’s experiments showing how water is a liquid crystal.) As more energy is absorbed the thickness of the crystal shell grows producing a larger negative charge that causes the water micro droplets to rise in the atmosphere. When the liquid crystals reach the top of the troposphere they reach the second melt point of a liquid crystal and the electric energy is converted back into infrared energy and radiated into space.

    The Earth’s surface has a negative that causes the liquid crystals to rise in the atmosphere. The negative charge of these crystals repels electrons on the surface of the Earth causing the area under thunderclouds to have a positive charge. When the liquid crystals melt and the electric charges neutralize, releasing the stored energy into space, the electrons on the surface of the Earth surge back creating lightning.

    This type of liquid crystal formation due to the absorption of infrared energy evens occurs when water is already an ice crystal as sublimation. The amount of water crystallizing into micro droplets will change as the amount of infrared radiation changes but as long as there is water, it will convert radiated energy into internal electric energy.
    ​Confirmation supporting this nature of water can be seen when water is boiled in a tea kettle. The water emerges as a clear gas and then, as it cools, converts to liquid water droplets. On further cooling these droplets disappear. If this was due to the water converting back to a gas the droplets would have to absorb more than the 540 calories/gram needed to convert 100C water into 100C steam.

    Instead the heat is causing crystal structures to grow in the water, cooling it. This is the normal phase change of matter as it loses energy, a gas converts to a liquid (excepting CO2), then to a solid. It does not go from a gas, to a liquid, to a gas, to a liquid, to a solid by cooling. Further supporting the hypothesis that evaporated water is a liquid crystal is that water that has been boiled, destroying the internal crystals, freezes faster than un-boiled water.
    This is because as the crystal melts it releases the internal heat but by boiling the water, these crystals are destroyed and the internal energy released in the process. Also if water were a gas because of its low molecular weight it would be found at higher altitudes and not almost exclusively in the troposphere.

    BAROMETER

    Objects do not radiate or transfer mass. It is only when in contact or joining with another object that mass will combine. You do not feel and increase in atmospheric pressure when an airplane flies overhead. The idea that mass of gas molecules in the atmosphere are somehow combining to produce an atmospheric pressure is false.

    The barometer is not measuring mass but, like the thermometer, the momentum of the gas molecules. The atmosphere is created by the kinetic energy of the gas molecules expanding against gravity. As long as the kinetic energy of argon, oxygen and nitrogen molecules are greater than their boiling point the mass of the atmosphere will be fairly constant, it is the

    density of the gasses that will change.

    As more energy is added to these gasses their volume expands and when the energy of the molecules decreases, the volume shrinks. The fact that the atmosphere grows less dense with altitude even when the reading of the thermometer records decreasing temperature shows that the thermometer is not measuring the kinetic energy of the molecules but the amount of energy.

    One would expect that a cold air, mass with its greater density, would register a higher barometric pressure than a warm air mass where there are fewer molecules per unit volume. This is not the case. A warm calm air mass has a greater barometric pressure than a cold low pressure area despite there being fewer gas molecules. A cold violent air mass is a low pressure area while a warm calm air mass is a high pressure area.

    This is because the barometer, like the thermometer, is also reading the momentum of the air molecules. In a still high pressure area the momentum is directed vertically downwards by gravity and even though there are fewer molecules per unit volume, they have a greater amount of downward momentum than a denser air mass where the molecules have horizontal velocity.

    As horizontal motion is added to the gas molecules they strike the measuring liquid of the barometer at an angle and molecules retain more of their momentum. The greater the

    horizontal velocity the lower the energy transferred to the instrument. The barometer is indicating how much of the gravitational momentum is being converted into horizontal flow. The lower the barometric reading the greater the horizontal flow of energy.

    When considering the flow of energy in the atmosphere it is important to consider the role of water as a reservoir of energy. Gas molecules with their greater velocity will transfer energy to water when they collide, following the conservation of momentum.

    The water will then store this energy as internal electric energy. When the velocity of the gas molecules drops below the energy of the molecules in the shell of the water crystal, the water then adds energy to the gas molecules, acting a storage battery for energy. This is what causes dew to form. It is the storage and release of energy that regulates the temperature on the Earth. When there is a lunar eclipse the temperature on the surface of the moon will drop from +230F to -240F in a matter of minutes, radiating that energy into space (red moon).

    On Earth, since most of the energy in the atmosphere is contained in the liquid water crystals this rapid extreme change does not occur.

    Hotter air molecules (more kinetic energy) rise and since the source of our energy is the sun, the molecules higher in the atmosphere are hotter (magnitude not amount radiated) than the molecules lower in the atmosphere. The flow of energy is downwards from the sun and then this energy expands outward on the Earth’s surface, not from the warmer (greater amount of energy being radiated) surface of the Earth to the atmosphere. This is a mistaken belief resulting from not knowing what the instruments are measuring.

    The Earth is not a perfect sphere but has a larger diameter at the equator. The flow of energy coming from the sun is from the equator and tropics towards the poles. As the energy flow downwards and towards the poles the Earth rotates underneath the flowing energy. This creates an area of high energy from which energy flows to other areas of the planet. During the year the sun is moving north or south in the tropics and as the rotation of the Earth moves under the hot spot the sun produces, the focal point moves west, causing a clockwise rotation of the air mass in the northern hemisphere and a counter clockwise rotation in the southern hemisphere.

    This is why hurricanes and typhoons tend to form along the equator after the first day of summer when the focal point is closest to the poles.

    At night and during the day when the sun is adding energy to the Earth, water is cooling the Earth’s surface by transporting energy to the stratosphere where it is radiated into space. In order to understand what is happening to the gasses in the atmosphere you must understand the flow of energy in it.

    In science you must understand what information your instruments are measuring if you are to gain an understanding of what is happening.

    By believing that the thermometer is measuring the kinetic energy of gas molecules instead of the amount of energy being transferred, the processes that are happening in the atmosphere can never be understood and the “science” will consist of studying history then guessing that history will be repeated next time the same circumstances occur.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      Hi Herb and Joe and any reader,


      “studying history then guessing that history will be repeated next time the same circumstances occur.” Actual scientists believe that history which is “repeated” the next time the same circumstances occur is a SCIENTIFIC LAW which explains nothing except what will occur the next time the same circumstances occur.

      Have a good day

      Reply

  • Avatar

    jerry Krause

    |

    Hi Herb and any other reader,

    I select the following paragraph fro,m Herb’s very long article. “In the troposphere the transfer of energy is primarily done through convection or collisions by the gas molecules while in the layers above the troposphere the primary way energy is transferred is by radiation. With convection there is a direct transfer of energy between objects while with radiation objects transfer energy to and absorb energy from the energy field they are in.”

    I ask Herb, or anyone else: Why does the atmosphere above the troposphere transmit radiation while the atmosphere aoove does?

    Have a good day

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Jerry Krause

      |

      “while the atmosphere ABOVE the troposphere does Another os my stupid errors

      Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via